Interprofessional Collaborative Practice and Law: A Reflective Analysis of 14 Regulation Structures

M. Girard
{"title":"Interprofessional Collaborative Practice and Law: A Reflective Analysis of 14 Regulation Structures","authors":"M. Girard","doi":"10.22230/JRIPE.2019V9N2A285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is a key element of an efficienthealthcare system. Are healthcare systems structured to facilitate IPC?Methods and findings: Fourteen jurisdictions were chosen and researched usinglegal and social sciences databases. Generally, there was a lack of understandingof the legal principles in literature on policy and IPC. That aside, every jurisdic-tion had acts and regulation specific to health professions. There were numerouspathways to professional regulation and no clear consensus. Regarding IPC pres-ence in legal text, there were two main integration pathways: professional-basedand organization-based approaches.Conclusion: Although the practice of IPC is important, its presence in regulationis still discrete. If the aim is to strengthen IPC, there must be more socio-legalresearch to properly address and inform policymakers.","PeriodicalId":89817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.22230/JRIPE.2019V9N2A285","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22230/JRIPE.2019V9N2A285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is a key element of an efficienthealthcare system. Are healthcare systems structured to facilitate IPC?Methods and findings: Fourteen jurisdictions were chosen and researched usinglegal and social sciences databases. Generally, there was a lack of understandingof the legal principles in literature on policy and IPC. That aside, every jurisdic-tion had acts and regulation specific to health professions. There were numerouspathways to professional regulation and no clear consensus. Regarding IPC pres-ence in legal text, there were two main integration pathways: professional-basedand organization-based approaches.Conclusion: Although the practice of IPC is important, its presence in regulationis still discrete. If the aim is to strengthen IPC, there must be more socio-legalresearch to properly address and inform policymakers.
跨专业合作实践与法律——对14种监管结构的反思分析
背景:跨专业合作(IPC)是高效医疗体系的关键要素。医疗保健系统的结构是否有利于IPC?方法和发现:使用法律和社会科学数据库选择并研究了14个司法管辖区。一般来说,关于政策和IPC的文献中缺乏对法律原则的理解。除此之外,每个司法机构都有专门针对卫生专业的法案和法规。专业监管有很多途径,但没有明确的共识。关于IPC在法律文本中的地位,有两种主要的整合途径:基于专业的方法和基于组织的方法。结论:尽管IPC的实践很重要,但其在监管中的存在仍然是离散的。如果目标是加强IPC,就必须有更多的社会法律研究来妥善解决问题并告知决策者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书