Minimum intervention dentistry for the management of caries in older adults: a review of the literature

I. Politi, C. Waldron, C. Mac Giolla Phadraig
{"title":"Minimum intervention dentistry for the management of caries in older adults: a review of the literature","authors":"I. Politi, C. Waldron, C. Mac Giolla Phadraig","doi":"10.58541/001c.72051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"##Statement of the problem The population is ageing and the proportion of older adults retaining their natural teeth is increasing. This means that there are increasing numbers of older adults at risk of and from dental caries for longer. This challenges traditional concepts of care delivery for older adults. With advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of dental caries, there is increasing evidence to support a shift from traditional mechanical ‘drill and fill’ techniques to the management of dental caries biologically as a complex ecological process. Minimum intervention dentistry (MID) has become an increasingly mainstream model of caries management, which minimises the need for treatment that destroys dental tissues. In contrast to traditional management of caries, MID focuses on prevention and risk reduction, while surgical intervention is limited to cases where it is absolutely necessary. This paper reviews the evidence to support adoption of MID, particularly for older adults in Ireland. ##Purpose of the study To review the evidence regarding aspects of MID for caries management among older adults. ##Materials and methods A structured search strategy was undertaken using PubMed, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library, with additional searching of reference lists. A total of 25 articles were deemed relevant to this literature review. The data was extracted and tabulated. The outcomes and quality of the studies were reported narratively. Weaknesses and clinical implications are discussed. ##Conclusions MID can be recommended for older adults. This review supports the use of topical fluorides in varnish, rinses and high-fluoride toothpaste to prevent dental caries in older adults, and the restoration of caries adopting the atraumatic restorative technique (ART). There was insufficient evidence regarding the effectiveness of oral health education. No studies were identified looking at the effectiveness of caries removal techniques, the resin infiltration technique, or the repair rather than replacement of restorations for older patients.","PeriodicalId":76043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Irish Dental Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Irish Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58541/001c.72051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

##Statement of the problem The population is ageing and the proportion of older adults retaining their natural teeth is increasing. This means that there are increasing numbers of older adults at risk of and from dental caries for longer. This challenges traditional concepts of care delivery for older adults. With advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of dental caries, there is increasing evidence to support a shift from traditional mechanical ‘drill and fill’ techniques to the management of dental caries biologically as a complex ecological process. Minimum intervention dentistry (MID) has become an increasingly mainstream model of caries management, which minimises the need for treatment that destroys dental tissues. In contrast to traditional management of caries, MID focuses on prevention and risk reduction, while surgical intervention is limited to cases where it is absolutely necessary. This paper reviews the evidence to support adoption of MID, particularly for older adults in Ireland. ##Purpose of the study To review the evidence regarding aspects of MID for caries management among older adults. ##Materials and methods A structured search strategy was undertaken using PubMed, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library, with additional searching of reference lists. A total of 25 articles were deemed relevant to this literature review. The data was extracted and tabulated. The outcomes and quality of the studies were reported narratively. Weaknesses and clinical implications are discussed. ##Conclusions MID can be recommended for older adults. This review supports the use of topical fluorides in varnish, rinses and high-fluoride toothpaste to prevent dental caries in older adults, and the restoration of caries adopting the atraumatic restorative technique (ART). There was insufficient evidence regarding the effectiveness of oral health education. No studies were identified looking at the effectiveness of caries removal techniques, the resin infiltration technique, or the repair rather than replacement of restorations for older patients.
最小干预牙科治疗老年人龋齿:文献综述
人口正在老龄化,老年人保留天然牙齿的比例正在增加。这意味着越来越多的老年人面临患龋齿的风险,而且患龋齿的时间更长。这挑战了为老年人提供护理的传统观念。随着对龋齿发病机制的理解不断深入,越来越多的证据支持从传统的机械“钻补”技术向作为复杂生态过程的生物管理龋齿的转变。最小干预牙科(MID)已逐渐成为龋齿管理的主流模式,它最大限度地减少了对破坏牙齿组织的治疗的需要。与传统的龋齿管理相比,MID侧重于预防和降低风险,而手术干预仅限于绝对必要的情况。本文回顾了支持MID采用的证据,特别是对爱尔兰的老年人。研究目的回顾MID在老年人龋齿管理方面的证据。使用PubMed、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane Library进行结构化检索策略,并对参考文献列表进行额外检索。共有25篇文章被认为与本文献综述相关。数据被提取并制成表格。研究的结果和质量以叙述性的方式报道。讨论了缺陷和临床意义。结论MID可推荐用于老年人。本综述支持在清漆、漱口水和高氟牙膏中使用局部氟化物来预防老年人龋齿,并采用非创伤修复技术(ART)修复龋齿。口腔健康教育的有效性证据不足。没有研究发现龋齿去除技术、树脂浸润技术或修复而不是替换修复体对老年患者的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信