Soft Matrix Game: A Hesitant Fuzzy MCDM Approach

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Jishu Jana, Sankar Kumar Roy
{"title":"Soft Matrix Game: A Hesitant Fuzzy MCDM Approach","authors":"Jishu Jana, Sankar Kumar Roy","doi":"10.1080/01966324.2020.1730273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Soft set theory has emerged recently as a new mathematical tool to handle uncertainty. Sometimes decision makers are not sure about the decision-making criteria, where soft set theory provides an idea to deal with such uncertainties. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) involves choosing the best from several alternatives. MCDM methods such as TOPSIS and VIKOR depend on an aggregating function for presenting “closeness to the ideal” which arises due to the compromise solution. The VIKOR method of compromise ranking describes a compromise solution, providing a maximum for the “maximizing player” and minimum for the “opponent”, which is an effective approach in an MCDM game. TOPSIS method presents a solution with the shortest distance to the positive ideal solution (PIS) and largest distance from the negative ideal solution (NIS). Also, hesitant fuzzy soft set is an appropriate tool to tackle the imprecise parameters introduced in MCDM problems by the decision maker (DM). In this paper, we extend the VIKOR and TOPSIS methods for solving MCDM game problems with hesitant fuzzy soft payoffs to determine the optimal strategies. Finally, a numerical example is incorporated to verify the extended VIKOR approach and the results are compared with those for the TOPSIS method. The paper ends with conclusions and outlooks.","PeriodicalId":35850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2020.1730273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract Soft set theory has emerged recently as a new mathematical tool to handle uncertainty. Sometimes decision makers are not sure about the decision-making criteria, where soft set theory provides an idea to deal with such uncertainties. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) involves choosing the best from several alternatives. MCDM methods such as TOPSIS and VIKOR depend on an aggregating function for presenting “closeness to the ideal” which arises due to the compromise solution. The VIKOR method of compromise ranking describes a compromise solution, providing a maximum for the “maximizing player” and minimum for the “opponent”, which is an effective approach in an MCDM game. TOPSIS method presents a solution with the shortest distance to the positive ideal solution (PIS) and largest distance from the negative ideal solution (NIS). Also, hesitant fuzzy soft set is an appropriate tool to tackle the imprecise parameters introduced in MCDM problems by the decision maker (DM). In this paper, we extend the VIKOR and TOPSIS methods for solving MCDM game problems with hesitant fuzzy soft payoffs to determine the optimal strategies. Finally, a numerical example is incorporated to verify the extended VIKOR approach and the results are compared with those for the TOPSIS method. The paper ends with conclusions and outlooks.
软矩阵博弈:一种犹豫模糊MCDM方法
摘要软集理论是近年来出现的一种处理不确定性的新数学工具。有时决策者不确定决策标准,而软集理论提供了一种处理这种不确定性的想法。多准则决策(MCDM)涉及从几个备选方案中选择最佳方案。MCDM方法,如TOPSIS和VIKOR,依赖于一个聚合函数来表示由于折衷解决方案而产生的“接近理想”。折衷排名的VIKOR方法描述了一种折衷解决方案,为“最大化玩家”提供最大值,为“对手”提供最小值,这是MCDM游戏中的一种有效方法。TOPSIS方法给出了一个到正理想解(PIS)距离最短、到负理想解(NIS)距离最大的解。此外,犹豫模糊软集是解决决策者(DM)在MCDM问题中引入的不精确参数的合适工具。在本文中,我们扩展了求解具有犹豫模糊软收益的MCDM博弈问题的VIKOR和TOPSIS方法,以确定最优策略。最后,结合一个数值例子验证了扩展的VIKOR方法,并将结果与TOPSIS方法的结果进行了比较。文章最后给出了结论和展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences
American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信