As escalas da Geografia: Pontes entre os conceitos de escala cartográfica e escala geográfica: The scales of Geography: bridges between the concepts of cartographic scale and geographic scale

IF 0.1 Q4 GEOGRAPHY
I. D. Oliveira, P. Romão
{"title":"As escalas da Geografia: Pontes entre os conceitos de escala cartográfica e escala geográfica: The scales of Geography: bridges between the concepts of cartographic scale and geographic scale","authors":"I. D. Oliveira, P. Romão","doi":"10.5216/BGG.V41.65735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Geography, the understanding and use of the concepts of cartographic scale and geographic scale help to define scientific research. Starting from classic texts that deal with the subject, the objective is to verify the relevance of the criticisms to the cartographic scale and its opposition to a concept of a “truly” geographical scale, in addition to presenting an contribution to this problem, with the definition of differences, similarities, limits and possibilities of each concept. Thus, the stages of this research consisted of exploratory bibliographic research of articles and books, on digital bases of free access on the Internet, anchored in the technique of retrospective investigation, from a reference work (CASTRO, 1995). This analysis results in the idea that there is still a conceptual uncertainty as to the geographical scale, hence the adoption or, sometimes, confusion with the cartographic scale. It also highlights the lack of understanding of the scope of cartography as a language, taking the map only by the limits imposed by its scale, and underestimating its real possibilities of contribution to geographic analysis.","PeriodicalId":52054,"journal":{"name":"Boletin Goiano de Geografia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletin Goiano de Geografia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5216/BGG.V41.65735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Geography, the understanding and use of the concepts of cartographic scale and geographic scale help to define scientific research. Starting from classic texts that deal with the subject, the objective is to verify the relevance of the criticisms to the cartographic scale and its opposition to a concept of a “truly” geographical scale, in addition to presenting an contribution to this problem, with the definition of differences, similarities, limits and possibilities of each concept. Thus, the stages of this research consisted of exploratory bibliographic research of articles and books, on digital bases of free access on the Internet, anchored in the technique of retrospective investigation, from a reference work (CASTRO, 1995). This analysis results in the idea that there is still a conceptual uncertainty as to the geographical scale, hence the adoption or, sometimes, confusion with the cartographic scale. It also highlights the lack of understanding of the scope of cartography as a language, taking the map only by the limits imposed by its scale, and underestimating its real possibilities of contribution to geographic analysis.
As escalas da Geografia: Pontes entre os conceitos de escala cartográfica e escala geográfica:地理比例尺:地图比例尺和地理比例尺概念之间的桥梁
在地理学中,理解和使用制图比例尺和地理比例尺的概念有助于定义科学研究。从涉及这一主题的经典文本开始,目的是验证对制图比例尺的批评及其对“真正”地理比例尺概念的反对的相关性,以及对每个概念的差异、相似性、局限性和可能性的定义。因此,这项研究的阶段包括对文章和书籍的探索性书目研究,基于互联网上免费访问的数字基础,基于参考文献的回顾性调查技术(CASTRO,1995)。这种分析的结果是,地理尺度在概念上仍然存在不确定性,因此采用了制图尺度,有时甚至与制图尺度混淆。它还强调了对制图作为一种语言的范围缺乏了解,只根据地图的比例尺所施加的限制来绘制地图,并低估了其对地理分析做出贡献的真正可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信