DETECTION OF BACTERIAL SPECIES ASSOCIATED WITH PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN A GROUP OF PATIENTS

Q4 Dentistry
Cristina Vodiță, Iosud „Titu Maiorescu“ Bucureşti România Şcoala Doctorală – Domeniul Medicină Dentară, D. Ghergic, Emanuel Alin Vodiță, R. Comăneanu, Laurenta Lelia Mihai, Bucureşti România Clinica stomatologică „Dr. Vodiță“, Universitatea „Titu Maiorescu“ Bucureşti România Facultatea de Medicină Dentară
{"title":"DETECTION OF BACTERIAL SPECIES ASSOCIATED WITH PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN A GROUP OF PATIENTS","authors":"Cristina Vodiță, Iosud „Titu Maiorescu“ Bucureşti România Şcoala Doctorală – Domeniul Medicină Dentară, D. Ghergic, Emanuel Alin Vodiță, R. Comăneanu, Laurenta Lelia Mihai, Bucureşti România Clinica stomatologică „Dr. Vodiță“, Universitatea „Titu Maiorescu“ Bucureşti România Facultatea de Medicină Dentară","doi":"10.37897/rjs.2021.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. The study aimed to detect the presence/quantification of the 12 bacterial strains more frequently involved in the occurrence and aggravation of periodontal disease in a group of patients. Material and method. The study included 55 patients of both sexes, from the portfolio of the „Dr. Vodiță“ Dental Clinic, with chronic marginal periodontitis, who had not been under regular dental control and hygiene for at least 2 years. During the first treatment session, fluid was collected from each patient from the periodontal bags using sterile paper cones from the collection putty. Subsequently, fluid-soaked paper cones from periodontal bags were sent to the Genetic Lab in Bucharest for DNA extraction and quantification of 12 bacterial species, more common in the etiology of periodontal disease. For the correctness of the results obtained, it is necessary that patients have not taken antibiotics in the last 3 weeks. The data were analyzed and statistically processed with the Microsoft Excel 2016 program. Results. The least common bacteria found were from the species: Capnocytophaga ochracea, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Eikanella corrodens and Campylobacter rectus, closely followed by Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia and Capnocytophaga sputigena. The rest of the bacterial species were detected much more frequently. Discussions. In the analyzed group there was no monoinfection with Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Porphyromonas gingivalis had an important presence in the studied group, registering increased levels in 89% of cases. In our group, Treponema denticola was present in increased amounts in 76.36% of cases. Tannerella forsythia was present in 92.72% of cases in elevated concentrations. Eikanella corrodens and Campylobacter rectus were present in 18.18% of the cases studied in high quantities. Prevotella intermedia was present in significant amounts in 34.54% of cases. Fusobacterium nucleatum was present in high concentrations in 98.18% of the cases studied. Prevotella nigrescens was present in increased amounts in 56.36% of cases. Capnocytophaga ochracea was present in 9.09% of cases in high amounts, Capnocytophaga sputigena in 38.18% of cases, and Capnocytophaga gingivalis was detected in 24.45% of cases. Conclusions. From the class of bacteria with high pathogenicity, we most frequently encountered in the studied group Tannerella forsythia. From the class of bacteria with moderate pathogenicity, we encountered the most common Fusobacterium nucleatum. From the class of bacteria with low pathogenicity, we encountered the most common Capnocytophaga sputigena. In order to validate the results obtained, it is necessary to extend the study to a larger number of patients.","PeriodicalId":33514,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana de Stomatologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana de Stomatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjs.2021.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. The study aimed to detect the presence/quantification of the 12 bacterial strains more frequently involved in the occurrence and aggravation of periodontal disease in a group of patients. Material and method. The study included 55 patients of both sexes, from the portfolio of the „Dr. Vodiță“ Dental Clinic, with chronic marginal periodontitis, who had not been under regular dental control and hygiene for at least 2 years. During the first treatment session, fluid was collected from each patient from the periodontal bags using sterile paper cones from the collection putty. Subsequently, fluid-soaked paper cones from periodontal bags were sent to the Genetic Lab in Bucharest for DNA extraction and quantification of 12 bacterial species, more common in the etiology of periodontal disease. For the correctness of the results obtained, it is necessary that patients have not taken antibiotics in the last 3 weeks. The data were analyzed and statistically processed with the Microsoft Excel 2016 program. Results. The least common bacteria found were from the species: Capnocytophaga ochracea, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Eikanella corrodens and Campylobacter rectus, closely followed by Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia and Capnocytophaga sputigena. The rest of the bacterial species were detected much more frequently. Discussions. In the analyzed group there was no monoinfection with Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Porphyromonas gingivalis had an important presence in the studied group, registering increased levels in 89% of cases. In our group, Treponema denticola was present in increased amounts in 76.36% of cases. Tannerella forsythia was present in 92.72% of cases in elevated concentrations. Eikanella corrodens and Campylobacter rectus were present in 18.18% of the cases studied in high quantities. Prevotella intermedia was present in significant amounts in 34.54% of cases. Fusobacterium nucleatum was present in high concentrations in 98.18% of the cases studied. Prevotella nigrescens was present in increased amounts in 56.36% of cases. Capnocytophaga ochracea was present in 9.09% of cases in high amounts, Capnocytophaga sputigena in 38.18% of cases, and Capnocytophaga gingivalis was detected in 24.45% of cases. Conclusions. From the class of bacteria with high pathogenicity, we most frequently encountered in the studied group Tannerella forsythia. From the class of bacteria with moderate pathogenicity, we encountered the most common Fusobacterium nucleatum. From the class of bacteria with low pathogenicity, we encountered the most common Capnocytophaga sputigena. In order to validate the results obtained, it is necessary to extend the study to a larger number of patients.
在一组患者中检测与牙周病相关的细菌种类
目标。该研究旨在检测/定量12种更频繁参与牙周病发生和加重的细菌菌株。材料和方法。这项研究包括了55名男女患者,他们都来自于“Dr。Vodiță“牙科诊所,患有慢性边缘牙周炎,至少2年没有进行常规牙齿控制和卫生。在第一次治疗期间,使用收集腻子中的无菌纸锥从每位患者的牙周袋中收集液体。随后,从牙周袋中取出的液体浸泡过的锥体被送到布加勒斯特的遗传实验室进行DNA提取和12种细菌的定量分析,这些细菌在牙周病的病因学中更为常见。为保证所得结果的正确性,患者在最近3周内没有服用抗生素。使用Microsoft Excel 2016程序对数据进行分析和统计处理。结果。最不常见的菌种为:紫碳细胞噬菌、放线菌聚集菌、腐蚀艾卡菌和直弯曲菌,紧随其后的是牙龈碳细胞噬菌、中间普雷沃菌和痰碳细胞噬菌。其余细菌种类的检测频率要高得多。讨论。分析组无单一放线菌聚集菌感染。牙龈卟啉单胞菌在研究组中有重要的存在,在89%的病例中记录的水平增加。本组病例中,牙密螺旋体数量增加,占76.36%。92.72%的病例中存在连翘单宁菌。18.18%的病例中存在大量的腐蚀艾卡奈菌和直弯曲杆菌。中普雷沃氏菌在34.54%的病例中大量存在。在98.18%的病例中有高浓度的核梭杆菌。56.36%的病例出现了数量增加的黑化普雷沃氏菌。9.09%的病例中检出了大量的紫藻细胞噬菌,38.18%的病例中检出了痰藻细胞噬菌,24.45%的病例中检出了牙龈细胞噬菌。结论。在具有高致病性的细菌类别中,我们在研究组中最常遇到的是连翘单宁菌。从具有中等致病性的细菌类别中,我们遇到了最常见的核梭杆菌。从低致病性的细菌类别中,我们遇到了最常见的嗜碳细胞噬菌。为了验证所获得的结果,有必要将研究扩展到更多的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信