Social movements and pedagogical renewal in the twentieth century: thoughts, practices, and resistances

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Pablo Toro Blanco
{"title":"Social movements and pedagogical renewal in the twentieth century: thoughts, practices, and resistances","authors":"Pablo Toro Blanco","doi":"10.14516/ete.553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few decades, an interpretative shift has emerged regarding the concept of social movements. As it currently appears, a crucial sign has been the progressive abandonment by the literature of the singular «social movement» because it meant a one-sided point of view that only considered a schematic focus on the most explicit dimensions of the classic notion of class struggle. Since the 1960s, the polysemy of the «social movements» category has embraced and incorporated other aspects of the reality labelled under the powerfully meaning word «conflict». The contemporary epistemic and political recognition of the intersectionality among social clashes (gender, age, class, race, and other angles) has enriched research agendas in social history and the history of education. A recent general overview of the field underlines the importance of these fields for the development of current research. For instance, regarding gender, Lucy E. Bayley and Karen Graves (2019, p.357) point out that «gendered analysis has enacted a radical intervention in the production of knowledge in educational history in recent decades through highlining women’s roles and experiences, exploring gendered educational forces, institutions, practices and policies and expanding the theories and methodologies through which the field produces meaning». A similar impact has been produced in the history of education as scholars follow ethnics or decolonial points of view.","PeriodicalId":41950,"journal":{"name":"Espacio Tiempo y Educacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Espacio Tiempo y Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14516/ete.553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last few decades, an interpretative shift has emerged regarding the concept of social movements. As it currently appears, a crucial sign has been the progressive abandonment by the literature of the singular «social movement» because it meant a one-sided point of view that only considered a schematic focus on the most explicit dimensions of the classic notion of class struggle. Since the 1960s, the polysemy of the «social movements» category has embraced and incorporated other aspects of the reality labelled under the powerfully meaning word «conflict». The contemporary epistemic and political recognition of the intersectionality among social clashes (gender, age, class, race, and other angles) has enriched research agendas in social history and the history of education. A recent general overview of the field underlines the importance of these fields for the development of current research. For instance, regarding gender, Lucy E. Bayley and Karen Graves (2019, p.357) point out that «gendered analysis has enacted a radical intervention in the production of knowledge in educational history in recent decades through highlining women’s roles and experiences, exploring gendered educational forces, institutions, practices and policies and expanding the theories and methodologies through which the field produces meaning». A similar impact has been produced in the history of education as scholars follow ethnics or decolonial points of view.
20世纪的社会运动和教育更新:思想、实践和抵抗
在过去几十年中,对社会运动概念的解释发生了转变。目前看来,一个关键的迹象是文学逐渐放弃了单一的“社会运动”,因为这意味着一种片面的观点,只考虑了对阶级斗争经典概念最明确维度的示意性关注。自20世纪60年代以来,“社会运动”类别的多义性已经包含并融合了现实的其他方面,这些方面被标记为含义强烈的“冲突”一词。当代对社会冲突(性别、年龄、阶级、种族和其他角度)之间交叉性的认识和政治认识丰富了社会史和教育史的研究议程。最近对该领域的总体概述强调了这些领域对当前研究发展的重要性。例如,关于性别,Lucy E.Bayley和Karen Graves(2019,第357页)指出,近几十年来,性别分析通过突出女性的角色和经历,探索性别教育力量、机构、,实践和政策,并扩展该领域产生意义的理论和方法»。在教育史上,由于学者们遵循种族或非殖民化的观点,也产生了类似的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Espacio Tiempo y Educacion
Espacio Tiempo y Educacion EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信