On classifier learning methodologies with application to compressed remote sensing images

Q3 Computer Science
G. Proskura, Oleksii S. Rubel, V. Lukin
{"title":"On classifier learning methodologies with application to compressed remote sensing images","authors":"G. Proskura, Oleksii S. Rubel, V. Lukin","doi":"10.32620/reks.2022.3.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote sensing images have found numerous applications nowadays. A traditional outcome or intermediate result of their processing is a classification map. Such maps are usually obtained from a pre-trained classifier and it is desired to have the produced classification maps as accurately as possible. The basic subject of this article is the factors determining this accuracy. The main among them are the quality of remote sensing data and classifier type, parameters and training approach. Image quality can be degraded due to several factors. One of them is distortions introduced by lossy compression that is widely used due to a huge volume of acquired data and the necessity to sufficiently decrease their size at transmission, storage and/or dissemination stages. Because of this, the main goal of this paper is to consider classification and lossy compression jointly. In particular, this means that the classifier learning can be performed for original (uncompressed, compressed in a lossless manner) images (if they are available) as well as for compressed data at hand (offered to a user for classification and further analysis). The task of this paper is to consider and compare these two options. The first one is the classifier learning for original images and further application to compressed data, where images can be compressed with different compression ratios while producing compressed data of different quality. The second option is the use of the classifier learning for compressed images, where compression parameters for training data can be approximately the same as for the images to which the classifier is applied. The main result is that the latter methodology can provide certain benefits compared to the classifier learning for original data if one has to classify compressed remote sensing data. Simulation data are obtained for a classifier based on a convolutional neural network. As images for training and verification, four real-life three-channel (visible range) Sentinel-2 remote sensing images of Kharkiv and Kharkiv region are employed that possess different complexity of the content and have four main classes. The practical recommendations are given. In conclusion, we can state that it is worth having classifiers trained for several degrees of compression and it is reasonable to compress complex structure images with special care.","PeriodicalId":36122,"journal":{"name":"Radioelectronic and Computer Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radioelectronic and Computer Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2022.3.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Remote sensing images have found numerous applications nowadays. A traditional outcome or intermediate result of their processing is a classification map. Such maps are usually obtained from a pre-trained classifier and it is desired to have the produced classification maps as accurately as possible. The basic subject of this article is the factors determining this accuracy. The main among them are the quality of remote sensing data and classifier type, parameters and training approach. Image quality can be degraded due to several factors. One of them is distortions introduced by lossy compression that is widely used due to a huge volume of acquired data and the necessity to sufficiently decrease their size at transmission, storage and/or dissemination stages. Because of this, the main goal of this paper is to consider classification and lossy compression jointly. In particular, this means that the classifier learning can be performed for original (uncompressed, compressed in a lossless manner) images (if they are available) as well as for compressed data at hand (offered to a user for classification and further analysis). The task of this paper is to consider and compare these two options. The first one is the classifier learning for original images and further application to compressed data, where images can be compressed with different compression ratios while producing compressed data of different quality. The second option is the use of the classifier learning for compressed images, where compression parameters for training data can be approximately the same as for the images to which the classifier is applied. The main result is that the latter methodology can provide certain benefits compared to the classifier learning for original data if one has to classify compressed remote sensing data. Simulation data are obtained for a classifier based on a convolutional neural network. As images for training and verification, four real-life three-channel (visible range) Sentinel-2 remote sensing images of Kharkiv and Kharkiv region are employed that possess different complexity of the content and have four main classes. The practical recommendations are given. In conclusion, we can state that it is worth having classifiers trained for several degrees of compression and it is reasonable to compress complex structure images with special care.
分类器学习方法及其在压缩遥感图像中的应用
遥感图像在当今已经有了许多应用。它们处理的传统结果或中间结果是分类图。这样的映射通常是从预先训练的分类器中获得的,并且期望具有尽可能精确的生成的分类映射。本文的基本主题是决定这种准确性的因素。其中主要包括遥感数据的质量和分类器类型、参数和训练方法。图像质量可能由于几个因素而降低。其中之一是由有损压缩引入的失真,由于获取的数据量巨大,并且需要在传输、存储和/或传播阶段充分减小其大小,因此有损压缩被广泛使用。正因为如此,本文的主要目标是将分类和有损压缩结合起来考虑。特别地,这意味着可以对原始(未压缩、以无损方式压缩)图像(如果它们可用)以及手头的压缩数据(提供给用户用于分类和进一步分析)执行分类器学习。本文的任务是考虑和比较这两种选择。第一个是对原始图像的分类器学习,并进一步应用于压缩数据,其中可以用不同的压缩比压缩图像,同时产生不同质量的压缩数据。第二种选择是对压缩图像使用分类器学习,其中训练数据的压缩参数可以与应用分类器的图像的压缩参数大致相同。主要结果是,如果必须对压缩遥感数据进行分类,则与原始数据的分类器学习相比,后一种方法可以提供一定的好处。获得了基于卷积神经网络的分类器的仿真数据。作为训练和验证的图像,采用了哈尔科夫和哈尔科夫地区的四幅真实的三通道(可见范围)哨兵-2遥感图像,这些图像具有不同的内容复杂性,分为四个主要类别。提出了切实可行的建议。总之,我们可以说,对分类器进行几个压缩度的训练是值得的,并且特别小心地压缩复杂结构的图像是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radioelectronic and Computer Systems
Radioelectronic and Computer Systems Computer Science-Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信