Beware of scientific scams! Hints to avoid predatory publishing in biological journals

IF 0.7 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
C. Pereira, M. Mello, D. Negreiros, J. Figueiredo, Walisson Kenedy-Siqueira, Lara Ribeiro Maia, Stephannie Fernandes, Gabriela França Carneiro Fernandes, Amanda Ponce de Leon, L. Ashworth, Y. Oki, G. C. de Castro, R. Aguilar, P. Fearnside, G. Fernandes
{"title":"Beware of scientific scams! Hints to avoid predatory publishing in biological journals","authors":"C. Pereira, M. Mello, D. Negreiros, J. Figueiredo, Walisson Kenedy-Siqueira, Lara Ribeiro Maia, Stephannie Fernandes, Gabriela França Carneiro Fernandes, Amanda Ponce de Leon, L. Ashworth, Y. Oki, G. C. de Castro, R. Aguilar, P. Fearnside, G. Fernandes","doi":"10.3897/neotropical.18.e108887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our motivation for writing this editorial is to alert the academic community about the risks of predatory publishing in Biology. By piggy-backing on the open access (OA) movement and taking advantage of the “publish or perish” culture in a system that prioritises quantity over quality, predatory publishing has grown exponentially in recent years and spread across all areas of knowledge. Thousands of predatory journals and books have emerged and (provided a fee is paid) they publish scientific papers and chapters without submitting them to rigorous peer review. Now there are even predatory meetings, which promise to accept talks and publish complete works for a fee, also without reviewing them properly. These profit-making machines can damage both academia and society, putting at risk the quality of science and public trust in it, the well-being of the population, the conservation of biodiversity and the mitigation of climate change. We show the modus operandi behind invitations to contribute to predatory journals, books and meetings and suggest ways to separate the wheat from the chaff. Finally, we discuss the need to create regulatory agencies that perform a careful and systematic evaluation of the activities carried out by publishers.","PeriodicalId":38462,"journal":{"name":"Neotropical Biology and Conservation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neotropical Biology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/neotropical.18.e108887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our motivation for writing this editorial is to alert the academic community about the risks of predatory publishing in Biology. By piggy-backing on the open access (OA) movement and taking advantage of the “publish or perish” culture in a system that prioritises quantity over quality, predatory publishing has grown exponentially in recent years and spread across all areas of knowledge. Thousands of predatory journals and books have emerged and (provided a fee is paid) they publish scientific papers and chapters without submitting them to rigorous peer review. Now there are even predatory meetings, which promise to accept talks and publish complete works for a fee, also without reviewing them properly. These profit-making machines can damage both academia and society, putting at risk the quality of science and public trust in it, the well-being of the population, the conservation of biodiversity and the mitigation of climate change. We show the modus operandi behind invitations to contribute to predatory journals, books and meetings and suggest ways to separate the wheat from the chaff. Finally, we discuss the need to create regulatory agencies that perform a careful and systematic evaluation of the activities carried out by publishers.
小心科学骗局!避免生物期刊掠夺性出版的提示
我们写这篇社论的动机是提醒学术界注意生物学掠夺性出版的风险。近年来,掠夺性出版借助开放获取(OA)运动,在一个数量优先于质量的体系中利用“要么出版,要么灭亡”的文化,呈指数级增长,并蔓延到所有知识领域。成千上万的掠夺性期刊和书籍已经出现,(只要支付费用)他们在没有经过严格同行评审的情况下发表科学论文和章节。现在甚至有掠夺性的会议,承诺接受会谈并付费出版全集,但也没有对其进行适当审查。这些营利机器可能会损害学术界和社会,使科学质量和公众对科学的信任、人民的福祉、生物多样性的保护和气候变化的缓解面临风险。我们展示了邀请向掠夺性期刊、书籍和会议投稿背后的运作方式,并提出了将小麦与谷壳分离的方法。最后,我们讨论了建立监管机构的必要性,这些机构对出版商的活动进行仔细和系统的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neotropical Biology and Conservation
Neotropical Biology and Conservation Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信