Spent behind the Wheel: Drivers' Labor in the Uber Economy

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Alexandrea J. Ravenelle
{"title":"Spent behind the Wheel: Drivers' Labor in the Uber Economy","authors":"Alexandrea J. Ravenelle","doi":"10.1177/00943061231181317q","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the ‘‘doing’’ of the research. Of course, this iterative and sequential process is possible because of the careful attention to training and test data. Sequential and iterative research is perhaps clearest in the discovery section of the text. Here the authors devote a substantial portion of the text to explaining the excitement of allowing one to discover an unexpected concept while in the process of analyzing data. Beginning from the assumption that text data does not have one ‘‘truth’’ to tell but rather that there are myriad methods to represent what the text can tell us (some more useful than others), the authors demonstrate that by using different methodologies, researchers can discover distinct aspects of bodies of text. They explain in detail several methods (e.g., clustering, mixed-membership topic models, and embeddings) that allow a researcher to uncover a pattern in text data that might not have otherwise emerged. That is, using a subset of textual data, researchers uncover a theme that they may not have begun their project with. This exciting new finding can then spur additional inquiries without ‘‘starting over’’ or polluting the scientific process. The authors navigate a fine line here and emphasize that this process of discovery (as well as other analytical procedures such as measurement and causal inference) maintains integrity by splitting the textual data into groups—some that the researcher discovers with and some that the researcher validates with. Here, we encounter a key aspect of this text that links computer science and the social sciences as well as inductive and deductive scholarship: the process of validation. Much of this text is dedicated to validation—its definition, its implementation, and especially its importance in the analysis of textual data. Hesitant readers should rest assured that the authors are not circumventing methodological rigor. This ambitious project is particularly admirable for its pursuit of multiple audiences. At different points in the text, the content is well suited for an advanced undergraduate methods class. At others, the methodological detail is such that even a experienced practitioner may not find it entirely comprehensible. As with most guidebooks, Text as Data cannot be all things to all interested parties; but it provides guidance for social scientists at multiple points in their journey. Helpfully, the authors are also careful to credit the many innovators and innovations in text analysis, pointing eager readers to other sources to further their study. Very occasionally, introducing the research process from the perspective of textual data does not balance well with the methodological specificity that follows in each section. This text is a much-needed addition to methodological work in the social sciences— not just because of its niche application to textual data, but because it contributes an important argument amid our occasional obsession with methodological purity at the cost of substantive contributions to knowledge.","PeriodicalId":46889,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","volume":"52 1","pages":"348 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231181317q","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the ‘‘doing’’ of the research. Of course, this iterative and sequential process is possible because of the careful attention to training and test data. Sequential and iterative research is perhaps clearest in the discovery section of the text. Here the authors devote a substantial portion of the text to explaining the excitement of allowing one to discover an unexpected concept while in the process of analyzing data. Beginning from the assumption that text data does not have one ‘‘truth’’ to tell but rather that there are myriad methods to represent what the text can tell us (some more useful than others), the authors demonstrate that by using different methodologies, researchers can discover distinct aspects of bodies of text. They explain in detail several methods (e.g., clustering, mixed-membership topic models, and embeddings) that allow a researcher to uncover a pattern in text data that might not have otherwise emerged. That is, using a subset of textual data, researchers uncover a theme that they may not have begun their project with. This exciting new finding can then spur additional inquiries without ‘‘starting over’’ or polluting the scientific process. The authors navigate a fine line here and emphasize that this process of discovery (as well as other analytical procedures such as measurement and causal inference) maintains integrity by splitting the textual data into groups—some that the researcher discovers with and some that the researcher validates with. Here, we encounter a key aspect of this text that links computer science and the social sciences as well as inductive and deductive scholarship: the process of validation. Much of this text is dedicated to validation—its definition, its implementation, and especially its importance in the analysis of textual data. Hesitant readers should rest assured that the authors are not circumventing methodological rigor. This ambitious project is particularly admirable for its pursuit of multiple audiences. At different points in the text, the content is well suited for an advanced undergraduate methods class. At others, the methodological detail is such that even a experienced practitioner may not find it entirely comprehensible. As with most guidebooks, Text as Data cannot be all things to all interested parties; but it provides guidance for social scientists at multiple points in their journey. Helpfully, the authors are also careful to credit the many innovators and innovations in text analysis, pointing eager readers to other sources to further their study. Very occasionally, introducing the research process from the perspective of textual data does not balance well with the methodological specificity that follows in each section. This text is a much-needed addition to methodological work in the social sciences— not just because of its niche application to textual data, but because it contributes an important argument amid our occasional obsession with methodological purity at the cost of substantive contributions to knowledge.
花在方向盘后面:优步经济中司机的劳动
“做”研究。当然,由于对训练和测试数据的仔细关注,这种迭代和顺序过程是可能的。顺序和迭代的研究可能是最清楚的发现部分的文本。在这里,作者花了大量的篇幅来解释在分析数据的过程中发现一个意想不到的概念是多么令人兴奋。从文本数据没有一个“真理”的假设开始,而是有无数种方法来表示文本可以告诉我们的东西(有些比其他更有用),作者证明,通过使用不同的方法,研究人员可以发现文本主体的不同方面。他们详细解释了几种方法(例如,聚类、混合成员主题模型和嵌入),这些方法允许研究人员发现文本数据中的模式,否则这些模式可能不会出现。也就是说,使用文本数据的子集,研究人员发现了他们可能没有开始他们的项目的主题。这一令人兴奋的新发现可以激发更多的研究,而不会“重新开始”或污染科学进程。作者在这里划了一条细线,强调发现过程(以及其他分析过程,如测量和因果推理)通过将文本数据分成几组来保持完整性——一些研究人员用来发现,一些研究人员用来验证。在这里,我们遇到了本文的一个关键方面,它将计算机科学与社会科学以及归纳和演绎学术联系起来:验证过程。本文的大部分内容都致力于验证——它的定义、实现,尤其是它在文本数据分析中的重要性。犹豫不决的读者应该放心,作者并没有回避严谨的方法。这个雄心勃勃的项目尤其令人钦佩的是它对多种观众的追求。在文本的不同点,内容是非常适合高级本科方法类。在其他情况下,方法的细节是这样的,即使是有经验的从业者也可能无法完全理解。与大多数指南一样,文本即数据不能满足所有相关方的所有需求;但它为社会科学家在他们的旅程中的多个点提供了指导。有益的是,作者们还小心翼翼地赞扬了文本分析领域的许多创新者和创新,为热心的读者指出了进一步研究的其他来源。偶尔,从文本数据的角度介绍研究过程并不能很好地平衡每个部分中随之而来的方法特殊性。这篇文章是社会科学方法论工作中急需的补充——不仅仅是因为它对文本数据的小范围应用,还因为它在我们偶尔痴迷于方法论的纯粹性而牺牲了对知识的实质性贡献的情况下,提供了一个重要的论据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信