Authorship trend and content analysis

IF 1.8 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
J. Sahoo, B. Mohanty, Oshin Biswal, N. K. Dash, J. Sahu
{"title":"Authorship trend and content analysis","authors":"J. Sahoo, B. Mohanty, Oshin Biswal, N. K. Dash, J. Sahu","doi":"10.1108/pmm-06-2019-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to examine the classic characteristics of highly cited articles (HCAs) of top-ranked library and information science (LIS) journals and get acquainted with the high-quality works in specific areas of LIS for distinguishing what gets cited and who the prolific authors are.,The HCAs published across the top four LIS journals were downloaded, coded and a database was developed with basic metadata elements for analysis using bibliometric indicators. Lotka’s Inverse Square Law of Scientific Productivity was applied to assess the author’s productivity of HCA. The content analysis method was also used to find out the emerging areas of research that have sought high citations.,Inferences were drawn for the proposed five number of research questions pertaining to individual productivity, collaboration patterns country and institutional productivity, impactful areas of research. The Netherland found to be the potential player among all the affiliating countries of authors and Loet Leydesdorff tops the list among the prolific authors. It is observed that Lotka’s Classical Law also fits the HCA data set in LIS. “Research impact measurement and research collaboration,” “Social networking” and “Research metrics and citation-based studies” are found to be the emerging areas of LIS research.,Researchers may find a way what gets cited in specific areas of LIS literature and why along with who are the prolific authors.,This study is important from the perspective of the growing research field of the LIS discipline to identify the papers that have influenced others papers as per citation count, spot the active and more impactful topics in LIS research.","PeriodicalId":44583,"journal":{"name":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","volume":"21 1","pages":"33-51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/pmm-06-2019-0021","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm-06-2019-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the classic characteristics of highly cited articles (HCAs) of top-ranked library and information science (LIS) journals and get acquainted with the high-quality works in specific areas of LIS for distinguishing what gets cited and who the prolific authors are.,The HCAs published across the top four LIS journals were downloaded, coded and a database was developed with basic metadata elements for analysis using bibliometric indicators. Lotka’s Inverse Square Law of Scientific Productivity was applied to assess the author’s productivity of HCA. The content analysis method was also used to find out the emerging areas of research that have sought high citations.,Inferences were drawn for the proposed five number of research questions pertaining to individual productivity, collaboration patterns country and institutional productivity, impactful areas of research. The Netherland found to be the potential player among all the affiliating countries of authors and Loet Leydesdorff tops the list among the prolific authors. It is observed that Lotka’s Classical Law also fits the HCA data set in LIS. “Research impact measurement and research collaboration,” “Social networking” and “Research metrics and citation-based studies” are found to be the emerging areas of LIS research.,Researchers may find a way what gets cited in specific areas of LIS literature and why along with who are the prolific authors.,This study is important from the perspective of the growing research field of the LIS discipline to identify the papers that have influenced others papers as per citation count, spot the active and more impactful topics in LIS research.
作者趋势及内容分析
本文的目的是检验顶级图书馆和信息科学(LIS)期刊高引用文章(HCA)的经典特征,并了解LIS特定领域的高质量作品,以区分哪些被引用,哪些是多产的作者。,下载、编码了四大LIS期刊上发表的HCA,并开发了一个数据库,其中包含基本的元数据元素,用于使用文献计量指标进行分析。应用Lotka的科学生产力平方反比定律对作者的HCA生产力进行了评估。内容分析方法也被用于找出寻求高引用率的新兴研究领域。,对提出的五个研究问题进行了推断,这些问题涉及个人生产力、合作模式、国家和机构生产力,以及有影响力的研究领域。荷兰在所有作家的附属国家中都是潜在的参与者,勒特·莱德斯多夫在多产作家中名列前茅。观察到Lotka的经典定律也适用于LIS中的HCA数据集。“研究影响测量和研究合作”、“社交网络”和“研究指标和基于引文的研究”被发现是LIS研究的新兴领域。,研究人员可能会找到一种方法,在LIS文献的特定领域中引用什么,为什么以及谁是多产的作者。,从LIS学科不断发展的研究领域来看,这项研究很重要,可以根据引文数量确定影响其他论文的论文,发现LIS研究中活跃且更有影响力的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Performance Measurement and Metrics
Performance Measurement and Metrics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: ■Quantitative and qualitative analysis ■Benchmarking ■The measurement and role of information in enhancing organizational effectiveness ■Quality techniques and quality improvement ■Training and education ■Methods for performance measurement and metrics ■Standard assessment tools ■Using emerging technologies ■Setting standards or service quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信