Truths and unfreedoms of regimes of insecurity and the resistance of the commons

IF 2 Q3 BUSINESS
S. Jagannathan, J. Joseph, P. Selvaraj
{"title":"Truths and unfreedoms of regimes of insecurity and the resistance of the commons","authors":"S. Jagannathan, J. Joseph, P. Selvaraj","doi":"10.5465/AMBPP.2015.18571ABSTRACT","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to explore narratives of insecurity to understand how the casualisation of the employment relationship makes life more fragile and precarious. The authors engage in an inquiry about how multinational enterprises (MNEs) structure precariousness for workers in emerging economies. The authors attempt to understand how workers analyse their experiences of precariousness and what form their resistance takes as a result of their analysis.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors engage with the narratives of eight Indian workers/trade union activists working in different marginal spaces of the Indian economy to uncover a commons where we are the multitude. By commons, the authors imply shared forms of property, which stand against the concept of private property that is central to the social relations of capitalism. The authors are performing the data of workers by interspersing them in an analysis of angst and hope.\n\n\nFindings\nWorkers understand their experiences of precariousness as emerging from a complex political economy structured by MNEs, which involves multiple fronts of marginalisation. Workers realize that they need to engage in comprehensive forms of resistance to undo the regimes of precariousness. Workers create shared universes of grief to relate to each other’s experiences of precariousness. The unfreedoms experienced by workers lead to a sharing of the social relations of commons where workers can resist by expressing solidarity with each other.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe authors contribute to practice by arguing that workers’ collectives should not accept the naturalisation of precariousness. By staging a dialogue about the injuries of precariousness, they can craft a politics of resistance that begins the process of commoning.\n\n\nSocial implications\nWorkers’ politics of resistance can significantly democratise the global political economy in important ways by advancing the potential for commons.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe authors make an original contribution to the study of precariousness in the context of international business by arguing that the experience of precariousness can lead to a commons where workers resist structures of injustice.\n","PeriodicalId":46124,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on International Business","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Perspectives on International Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2015.18571ABSTRACT","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore narratives of insecurity to understand how the casualisation of the employment relationship makes life more fragile and precarious. The authors engage in an inquiry about how multinational enterprises (MNEs) structure precariousness for workers in emerging economies. The authors attempt to understand how workers analyse their experiences of precariousness and what form their resistance takes as a result of their analysis. Design/methodology/approach The authors engage with the narratives of eight Indian workers/trade union activists working in different marginal spaces of the Indian economy to uncover a commons where we are the multitude. By commons, the authors imply shared forms of property, which stand against the concept of private property that is central to the social relations of capitalism. The authors are performing the data of workers by interspersing them in an analysis of angst and hope. Findings Workers understand their experiences of precariousness as emerging from a complex political economy structured by MNEs, which involves multiple fronts of marginalisation. Workers realize that they need to engage in comprehensive forms of resistance to undo the regimes of precariousness. Workers create shared universes of grief to relate to each other’s experiences of precariousness. The unfreedoms experienced by workers lead to a sharing of the social relations of commons where workers can resist by expressing solidarity with each other. Practical implications The authors contribute to practice by arguing that workers’ collectives should not accept the naturalisation of precariousness. By staging a dialogue about the injuries of precariousness, they can craft a politics of resistance that begins the process of commoning. Social implications Workers’ politics of resistance can significantly democratise the global political economy in important ways by advancing the potential for commons. Originality/value The authors make an original contribution to the study of precariousness in the context of international business by arguing that the experience of precariousness can lead to a commons where workers resist structures of injustice.
不安全政权的真相和不自由以及平民的反抗
目的本文旨在探讨不安全感的叙事,以了解就业关系的随意化如何使生活变得更加脆弱和不稳定。作者对跨国企业如何为新兴经济体的工人构建不稳定的结构进行了调查。作者试图了解工人们是如何分析他们的不稳定经历的,以及他们的分析结果是什么形式的抵抗。设计/方法论/方法作者讲述了八名印度工人/工会活动家在印度经济的不同边缘空间工作的故事,以揭示我们是大众的共同点。通过公地,作者暗示了共有的财产形式,这与私有财产的概念背道而驰,私有财产是资本主义社会关系的核心。作者通过将工人的数据穿插在焦虑和希望的分析中来执行这些数据。FindingsWorkers将他们的不稳定经历理解为是从跨国公司构建的复杂政治经济中走出来的,这涉及到边缘化的多个方面。工人们意识到,他们需要进行全面的抵抗,以推翻不稳定的政权。工人们创造了共同的悲伤世界,将彼此的不稳定经历联系起来。工人所经历的不自由导致了公域社会关系的共享,在公域中,工人可以通过表达彼此的团结来抵抗。实践含义作者认为工人集体不应接受不稳定的归化,从而为实践做出贡献。通过就不稳定的伤害进行对话,他们可以制定一种开始共同化进程的抵抗政治。社会影响工人的抵抗政治可以通过提高公地的潜力,在重要方面使全球政治经济民主化。独创性/价值作者对国际商业背景下的不稳定性研究做出了独创性贡献,他们认为,不稳定性的经历可以导致工人抵制不公正结构的公域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
15.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: In recent years, the business practices and management philosophies of global enterprises have been subject to increasingly close scrutiny by commentators in the fields of journalism and academia. Such scrutiny has been motivated by a growing desire to examine the nature of globalisation, its impact on specific communities and its benefits for society as a whole. Coverage includes, but is not restricted to, issues of: ■Globalization ■Production and consumption ■Economic change ■Societal change ■Politics and power of organizations and governments ■Environmental impact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信