Статистичне оцінювання якості освітньої програми “Економічна аналітика та статистика”, рівня задоволеності навчанням та факторів, що їх визначають

N. Kovtun, M. Zhuravel
{"title":"Статистичне оцінювання якості освітньої програми “Економічна аналітика та статистика”, рівня задоволеності навчанням та факторів, що їх визначають","authors":"N. Kovtun, M. Zhuravel","doi":"10.31767/su.2(97)2022.02.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today’s changing world, training of specialists in any sphere requires a constant active search on the part of educational service providers for the development of relevant competencies of students of higher education, to ensure the correspondence of educational training to the modern needs of practice. That is why any educational program needs not only an internal but also an external audit aimed at its improvement. Understanding the factors that determine the quality of the program by chance is the basis not only for building a sustainable and competitive system of training specialists, but also for its successful practical implementation. Such a system should be based on providing feedback to students. One of the forms of such communication is a survey of students and graduates regarding the quality of the educational program and the level of satisfaction with education to find the factors that determine them. To achieve this goal, an expert questionnaire was developed, which includes three blocks of questions regarding the completeness of the program itself, its implementation in the educational process and in practice. A list of questionnaire questions is proposed, which potentially outline the range of problems of student training and possible ways to solve them. \nTo evaluate the quality of the educational program in different blocks of disciplines, its main advantages and disadvantages, comparative diagrams of factors that influenced the decision-making regarding admission were constructed. Considerable attention is paid to the comparative analysis of the distribution of grades depending on the educational level of training: bachelors, masters, graduates. \nThe implementation of the program in the educational process is considered in detail, namely: the level of teaching disciplines, their methodical support, and the evaluation system. The observance of the rules of academic integrity by teachers and students studying in the educational program and the organization of the educational process are analyzed separately. Questions were also asked that were supposed to reveal the need to implement certain actions to become a good specialist. \nSpecial attention is paid to the retrospective evaluation of the educational program, which is a generalized measure of its quality, because it summarizes the respondents’ answers to the important question: “If you had the information, you now have about studying in this program at the university before entering, would you choose it?”. For this purpose, the authors proposed an approach to the analysis of the level of satisfaction with education using binary output models. The change in the probability of the outcome variables when the predictors change, and the reliability of the models were also evaluated. The capabilities of binary output models in confirming analytical assumptions are shown. \nProposals have been put forward regarding the possibilities of improving students’ attitudes towards the educational program and eliminating existing shortcomings.","PeriodicalId":52812,"journal":{"name":"Statistika Ukrayini","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistika Ukrayini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31767/su.2(97)2022.02.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today’s changing world, training of specialists in any sphere requires a constant active search on the part of educational service providers for the development of relevant competencies of students of higher education, to ensure the correspondence of educational training to the modern needs of practice. That is why any educational program needs not only an internal but also an external audit aimed at its improvement. Understanding the factors that determine the quality of the program by chance is the basis not only for building a sustainable and competitive system of training specialists, but also for its successful practical implementation. Such a system should be based on providing feedback to students. One of the forms of such communication is a survey of students and graduates regarding the quality of the educational program and the level of satisfaction with education to find the factors that determine them. To achieve this goal, an expert questionnaire was developed, which includes three blocks of questions regarding the completeness of the program itself, its implementation in the educational process and in practice. A list of questionnaire questions is proposed, which potentially outline the range of problems of student training and possible ways to solve them. To evaluate the quality of the educational program in different blocks of disciplines, its main advantages and disadvantages, comparative diagrams of factors that influenced the decision-making regarding admission were constructed. Considerable attention is paid to the comparative analysis of the distribution of grades depending on the educational level of training: bachelors, masters, graduates. The implementation of the program in the educational process is considered in detail, namely: the level of teaching disciplines, their methodical support, and the evaluation system. The observance of the rules of academic integrity by teachers and students studying in the educational program and the organization of the educational process are analyzed separately. Questions were also asked that were supposed to reveal the need to implement certain actions to become a good specialist. Special attention is paid to the retrospective evaluation of the educational program, which is a generalized measure of its quality, because it summarizes the respondents’ answers to the important question: “If you had the information, you now have about studying in this program at the university before entering, would you choose it?”. For this purpose, the authors proposed an approach to the analysis of the level of satisfaction with education using binary output models. The change in the probability of the outcome variables when the predictors change, and the reliability of the models were also evaluated. The capabilities of binary output models in confirming analytical assumptions are shown. Proposals have been put forward regarding the possibilities of improving students’ attitudes towards the educational program and eliminating existing shortcomings.
对“经济分析和统计”教育方案的质量、对学习的满意度及其决定因素的统计评价
在当今不断变化的世界中,任何领域的专家培训都需要教育服务提供者不断积极地寻找高等教育学生相关能力的发展,以确保教育培训与现代实践需求的对应。这就是为什么任何教育项目不仅需要内部审计,还需要外部审计,以改善其质量。了解决定项目质量的因素,不仅是建立可持续和有竞争力的专家培训体系的基础,也是成功实施的基础。这样一个系统应该建立在向学生提供反馈的基础上。这种交流的一种形式是对学生和毕业生进行关于教育项目质量和教育满意度的调查,以找到决定它们的因素。为了实现这一目标,我们开发了一份专家问卷,其中包括三个问题块,涉及项目本身的完整性、在教育过程中的实施和实践。提出了一份问卷问题清单,其中可能概述了学生培训问题的范围以及解决这些问题的可能方法。为了评价不同学科块的教育项目质量及其主要优势和劣势,构建了影响录取决策的因素对比图。相当多的注意力放在了对不同教育水平的成绩分布的比较分析上:学士、硕士、研究生。该方案的实施在教育过程中被详细考虑,即:教学学科的水平,他们的系统支持和评估系统。分别分析了在教育项目中学习的教师和学生对学术诚信规则的遵守情况以及教育过程的组织情况。他们还问了一些问题,这些问题应该揭示出,要成为一名优秀的专家,需要采取某些行动。特别注意的是对教育项目的回顾性评估,这是对其质量的一种广义衡量,因为它总结了受访者对一个重要问题的回答:“如果你现在有关于在进入大学之前学习这个项目的信息,你会选择它吗?”为此,作者提出了一种使用二元输出模型来分析教育满意度的方法。预测因子变化时结果变量的概率变化,以及模型的可靠性。显示了二元输出模型在确认分析假设方面的能力。关于改善学生对教育计划的态度和消除现有缺点的可能性,已经提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信