Individual and Institutional Outcomes of Nurse Residency Program for New Nurses: A Systematic Review

Q3 Nursing
Min-Kyoung Han, Sujin Shin, Jeonghyun Kim
{"title":"Individual and Institutional Outcomes of Nurse Residency Program for New Nurses: A Systematic Review","authors":"Min-Kyoung Han, Sujin Shin, Jeonghyun Kim","doi":"10.7475/KJAN.2021.33.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to review the outcomes of nurse residency programs for new graduate nurses. Methods: The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed articles on the outcomes of nurse residency programs for new graduate nurses published in English from 2010 to 2019. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, CINAHL, Science Direct, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases using the search terms \"nurse residency program,\" \"new graduate nurse,\" and \"transition to practice program.\" A qualitative appraisal of studies was conducted using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Results: Twenty-five studies were selected. The systematic review found that nurse residency programs effectively increased the competence and confidence of new graduate nurses in 14 studies. Job satisfaction, job stress and anxiety, and support showed different results, which were increased, decreased, or statistically insignificant after the programs. In three studies, institutional outcomes, including the retention rate in 16 surveys and hospital cost savings, were improved. Patient safety had different results depending upon the study. Conclusion: This study's results can provide evidence for the necessity of a standardized nursing education program and for developing a system for evaluating its effectiveness to improve the quality of nursing education.","PeriodicalId":38646,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Adult Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Adult Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7475/KJAN.2021.33.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to review the outcomes of nurse residency programs for new graduate nurses. Methods: The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed articles on the outcomes of nurse residency programs for new graduate nurses published in English from 2010 to 2019. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, CINAHL, Science Direct, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases using the search terms "nurse residency program," "new graduate nurse," and "transition to practice program." A qualitative appraisal of studies was conducted using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Results: Twenty-five studies were selected. The systematic review found that nurse residency programs effectively increased the competence and confidence of new graduate nurses in 14 studies. Job satisfaction, job stress and anxiety, and support showed different results, which were increased, decreased, or statistically insignificant after the programs. In three studies, institutional outcomes, including the retention rate in 16 surveys and hospital cost savings, were improved. Patient safety had different results depending upon the study. Conclusion: This study's results can provide evidence for the necessity of a standardized nursing education program and for developing a system for evaluating its effectiveness to improve the quality of nursing education.
新护士住院医师计划的个人和机构结果:系统回顾
目的:本研究旨在回顾新毕业护士住院医师计划的结果。方法:纳入标准为同行评议的2010 - 2019年新毕业护士住院医师项目结果的英文论文。在PubMed、CINAHL、Science Direct、EMBASE和PsycINFO数据库中进行文献检索,检索词为“护士住院医师计划”、“新毕业护士”和“向实践计划过渡”。采用修订后的Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)和非随机干预研究偏倚风险工具(ROBINS-I)对研究进行定性评价。结果:入选25项研究。系统回顾发现,在14项研究中,护士住院医师计划有效地提高了新毕业护士的能力和信心。工作满意度、工作压力与焦虑、支持表现出不同的结果,有增加的,有减少的,或统计上不显著。在三项研究中,机构成果得到改善,包括16项调查中的保留率和医院成本节约。根据不同的研究,患者的安全性有不同的结果。结论:本研究结果可为制定规范化护理教育计划的必要性及建立护理教育效果评估体系,以提高护理教育质量提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Adult Nursing
Korean Journal of Adult Nursing Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信