Immunotherapy for recurrent pregnancy loss: a reappraisal

Geneviève Genest M.D. , Walaa Almasri M.D. , Shorooq Banjar M.D. , Coralie Beauchamp M.D. , William Buckett M.D. , Frederick Dzineku M.D. , Ezgi Demirtas M.D. , Phil Gold M.D., Ph.D. , Michael H. Dahan M.D. , Wael Jamal M.D. , Isaac Jacques Kadoch M.D. , Louise Lapensée M.D. , Neal Mahutte M.D. , Pierre Miron M.D., Ph.D. , Camille Sylvestre M.D. , Togas Tulandi M.D. , Ciriaco A. Piccirillo Ph.D. , Carl A. Laskin M.D.
{"title":"Immunotherapy for recurrent pregnancy loss: a reappraisal","authors":"Geneviève Genest M.D. ,&nbsp;Walaa Almasri M.D. ,&nbsp;Shorooq Banjar M.D. ,&nbsp;Coralie Beauchamp M.D. ,&nbsp;William Buckett M.D. ,&nbsp;Frederick Dzineku M.D. ,&nbsp;Ezgi Demirtas M.D. ,&nbsp;Phil Gold M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Michael H. Dahan M.D. ,&nbsp;Wael Jamal M.D. ,&nbsp;Isaac Jacques Kadoch M.D. ,&nbsp;Louise Lapensée M.D. ,&nbsp;Neal Mahutte M.D. ,&nbsp;Pierre Miron M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Camille Sylvestre M.D. ,&nbsp;Togas Tulandi M.D. ,&nbsp;Ciriaco A. Piccirillo Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Carl A. Laskin M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Recurrent pregnancy loss<span> (RPL) is frequently encountered in the outpatient setting. Despite extensive investigation, up to 50% of patients will be diagnosed with idiopathic RPL, for which no effective treatment exists. While the immune system is intricately involved in the initiation and maintenance of pregnancy, there are no validated diagnostic tests to confirm immune-mediated pregnancy loss. Therefore, </span></span>drugs<span><span> aiming to modulate or suppress the immune system are often used on speculation with limited scientific evidence. As the literature is heterogeneous and difficult to assimilate, we sought to provide the reader with an objective and comprehensive review of each type of treatment (progesterone, aspirin<span>, low-molecular-weight heparin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, human chorionic gonadotropin, corticosteroids, </span></span>Intralipids, and intravenous immunoglobulins), highlighting the possible mechanisms of action, potential efficacy or futility, and risks associated. This review aims to summarize current knowledge on the topic, provide a clinical guide for decision-making, and identify knowledge gaps required to harmonize practices and develop guidelines for suspected immune-mediated RPL management.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":73011,"journal":{"name":"F&S reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666571921000244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is frequently encountered in the outpatient setting. Despite extensive investigation, up to 50% of patients will be diagnosed with idiopathic RPL, for which no effective treatment exists. While the immune system is intricately involved in the initiation and maintenance of pregnancy, there are no validated diagnostic tests to confirm immune-mediated pregnancy loss. Therefore, drugs aiming to modulate or suppress the immune system are often used on speculation with limited scientific evidence. As the literature is heterogeneous and difficult to assimilate, we sought to provide the reader with an objective and comprehensive review of each type of treatment (progesterone, aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, human chorionic gonadotropin, corticosteroids, Intralipids, and intravenous immunoglobulins), highlighting the possible mechanisms of action, potential efficacy or futility, and risks associated. This review aims to summarize current knowledge on the topic, provide a clinical guide for decision-making, and identify knowledge gaps required to harmonize practices and develop guidelines for suspected immune-mediated RPL management.

复发性妊娠丢失的免疫治疗:重新评估
复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)是经常遇到门诊设置。尽管进行了广泛的调查,高达50%的患者将被诊断为特发性RPL,目前尚无有效的治疗方法。虽然免疫系统复杂地参与了妊娠的开始和维持,但目前还没有有效的诊断测试来证实免疫介导的妊娠丢失。因此,旨在调节或抑制免疫系统的药物往往是在科学证据有限的猜测中使用的。由于文献的异质性和难以理解,我们试图为读者提供一个客观和全面的回顾每一种类型的治疗(黄体酮,阿司匹林,低分子肝素,粒细胞集落刺激因子,人绒毛膜促性腺激素,皮质类固醇,脂质内和静脉注射免疫球蛋白),强调可能的作用机制,潜在的疗效或无效,以及相关的风险。本综述旨在总结当前关于该主题的知识,为决策提供临床指导,并确定协调实践和制定疑似免疫介导的RPL管理指南所需的知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F&S reviews
F&S reviews Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Urology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信