Student Experiences of a Home-Based Acute Care Curriculum

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION
Suzanne Trojanowski, Erica Sherman, Min Hui Huang
{"title":"Student Experiences of a Home-Based Acute Care Curriculum","authors":"Suzanne Trojanowski, Erica Sherman, Min Hui Huang","doi":"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted physical therapy education beginning in March 2020. Acute care physical therapy is complex and has substantive psychomotor skills and safety demands. Students can experience significant challenges during acute care clinical education experiences (CEE); therefore, assessment of the effect of curricular adjustments on preparation for clinical experiences is paramount. Students can experience significant challenges during acute care CEE. Educational programs continue to assess the effect of pandemic dictated altered modes of delivery of laboratory-based courses on student outcomes. The purpose of this qualitative case report is to explore students' experiences of an online delivery mode of an acute care course and their perception of its ability to prepare the student for an acute care CEE. Case Description: Interviews were completed with physical therapist students after their terminal acute care CEE. Qualitative analysis was approached from an interpretive epistemological perspective and a phenomenological approach was used to explore students' experience in participating in an online delivery mode to gain the required skills to be effective during acute care physical therapist practice. Data analysis was completed using a thematic analysis approach. Outcomes: Seven students participated in qualitative interviews after their acute care educational experience. Qualitative results revealed 3 main themes: (1) Course Design, (2) Fidelity, and (3) Learner Characteristics as contributors to feelings of preparedness when transitioning from the classroom to an acute care CEE. Discussion and Conclusion: Despite COVID-19 disruptions to traditional in-person education delivery of an acute care laboratory-based course, a unique at-home delivery of acute care curriculum led to students reporting sufficient skill development to participate in an acute care CEE. Aspects of the unique course that students reported facilitated their learning were skill repetition and fidelity to clinical practice embedded in laboratory activities. Results can be used to intentionally design coursework to aide in building student confidence and preparation for acute care CEE.","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted physical therapy education beginning in March 2020. Acute care physical therapy is complex and has substantive psychomotor skills and safety demands. Students can experience significant challenges during acute care clinical education experiences (CEE); therefore, assessment of the effect of curricular adjustments on preparation for clinical experiences is paramount. Students can experience significant challenges during acute care CEE. Educational programs continue to assess the effect of pandemic dictated altered modes of delivery of laboratory-based courses on student outcomes. The purpose of this qualitative case report is to explore students' experiences of an online delivery mode of an acute care course and their perception of its ability to prepare the student for an acute care CEE. Case Description: Interviews were completed with physical therapist students after their terminal acute care CEE. Qualitative analysis was approached from an interpretive epistemological perspective and a phenomenological approach was used to explore students' experience in participating in an online delivery mode to gain the required skills to be effective during acute care physical therapist practice. Data analysis was completed using a thematic analysis approach. Outcomes: Seven students participated in qualitative interviews after their acute care educational experience. Qualitative results revealed 3 main themes: (1) Course Design, (2) Fidelity, and (3) Learner Characteristics as contributors to feelings of preparedness when transitioning from the classroom to an acute care CEE. Discussion and Conclusion: Despite COVID-19 disruptions to traditional in-person education delivery of an acute care laboratory-based course, a unique at-home delivery of acute care curriculum led to students reporting sufficient skill development to participate in an acute care CEE. Aspects of the unique course that students reported facilitated their learning were skill repetition and fidelity to clinical practice embedded in laboratory activities. Results can be used to intentionally design coursework to aide in building student confidence and preparation for acute care CEE.
以家庭为基础的急症护理课程的学生体验
背景/目的:从2020年3月开始,新冠肺炎大流行中断了物理治疗教育。急性护理物理治疗是复杂的,具有实质性的精神运动技能和安全要求。学生可以在急症护理临床教育经历(CEE)中经历重大挑战;因此,评估课程调整对临床经验准备的影响是至关重要的。学生在急症护理考试中会遇到重大挑战。教育项目继续评估大流行导致的实验室授课模式改变对学生成绩的影响。本定性案例报告的目的是探讨学生对急症护理课程在线交付模式的体验,以及他们对在线交付模式为学生准备急症护理课程的能力的看法。案例描述:访谈完成了物理治疗师学生在他们的晚期急症护理CEE。从解释认识论的角度进行定性分析,并使用现象学的方法来探索学生参与在线交付模式的经验,以获得在急性护理物理治疗师实践中有效所需的技能。数据分析采用专题分析方法完成。结果:7名学生在接受急症护理教育后参加了定性访谈。定性结果揭示了3个主要主题:(1)课程设计,(2)保真度,(3)学习者特征在从课堂过渡到急症护理CEE时对准备感的影响。讨论和结论:尽管COVID-19破坏了传统的急性护理实验室课程的面对面教育,但独特的急性护理课程在家交付使学生报告了足够的技能发展,可以参加急性护理CEE。学生们报告说,这门独特的课程促进了他们的学习,其中包括技能重复和对实验室活动中临床实践的忠诚。结果可以用来有意地设计课程,以帮助建立学生的信心和准备急症护理CEE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信