{"title":"A systemic, multiple socialization approach to the study of prosocial development","authors":"Cara Streit, M. McGinley, G. Carlo","doi":"10.1177/02654075231196595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prosocial development includes tendencies, such as empathy, sympathy, helping behaviors, prosocial values, prosocial moral reasoning, and forgiveness, that reflect a concern for, and benevolence towards, others (Carlo, 2014). Prosocial tendencies form the foundations of positive interpersonal relationships, group cooperation, moral exemplary behaviors, and social justice (Carlo, 2014). These tendencies are deemed markers of healthy and normative social functioning and can also be manifested under conditions of adversity. Indeed, there is also accumulating evidence that prosocial development can mitigate maladaptive and antisocial outcomes and enhance other adaptive behaviors and outcomes (e.g., academic achievement, anxiety, depression; Carlo et al., 2018). Most traditional theories of prosocial development acknowledge the central socializing influence of family, peers, and media in children’s prosociality (Carlo and Conejo, 2019; Carlo and de Guzman, 2009; Eisenberg, 1986). However, despite demonstrated links between these distinct socializing influences, few studies examine the more ecologically valid notion that such influences are likely to interactively and jointly influence children’s prosocial development. Utilizing this approach would acknowledge the dynamic systems that shape children’s lives. Further, adopting a systemic socializing influence perspective would likely prompt the use of relatively sophisticated and innovative methodologies to account these multiple influences. The aim of the present special issue is to highlight the manner in which two or more socialization agents (e.g., parents, siblings, peers, schools, youth organizations,","PeriodicalId":48288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","volume":"40 1","pages":"2731 - 2739"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231196595","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prosocial development includes tendencies, such as empathy, sympathy, helping behaviors, prosocial values, prosocial moral reasoning, and forgiveness, that reflect a concern for, and benevolence towards, others (Carlo, 2014). Prosocial tendencies form the foundations of positive interpersonal relationships, group cooperation, moral exemplary behaviors, and social justice (Carlo, 2014). These tendencies are deemed markers of healthy and normative social functioning and can also be manifested under conditions of adversity. Indeed, there is also accumulating evidence that prosocial development can mitigate maladaptive and antisocial outcomes and enhance other adaptive behaviors and outcomes (e.g., academic achievement, anxiety, depression; Carlo et al., 2018). Most traditional theories of prosocial development acknowledge the central socializing influence of family, peers, and media in children’s prosociality (Carlo and Conejo, 2019; Carlo and de Guzman, 2009; Eisenberg, 1986). However, despite demonstrated links between these distinct socializing influences, few studies examine the more ecologically valid notion that such influences are likely to interactively and jointly influence children’s prosocial development. Utilizing this approach would acknowledge the dynamic systems that shape children’s lives. Further, adopting a systemic socializing influence perspective would likely prompt the use of relatively sophisticated and innovative methodologies to account these multiple influences. The aim of the present special issue is to highlight the manner in which two or more socialization agents (e.g., parents, siblings, peers, schools, youth organizations,
亲社会发展包括移情、同情、帮助行为、亲社会价值观、亲社会道德推理和宽恕等倾向,这些倾向反映了对他人的关心和仁慈(Carlo, 2014)。亲社会倾向形成了积极的人际关系、群体合作、道德模范行为和社会正义的基础(Carlo, 2014)。这些倾向被认为是健康和规范的社会功能的标志,在逆境条件下也可以表现出来。事实上,也有越来越多的证据表明,亲社会发展可以减轻适应不良和反社会的结果,并增强其他适应行为和结果(例如,学业成绩、焦虑、抑郁;Carlo et al., 2018)。大多数传统的亲社会发展理论都承认家庭、同伴和媒体对儿童亲社会的核心社会影响(Carlo and Conejo, 2019;Carlo and de Guzman, 2009;艾森伯格,1986)。然而,尽管证明了这些不同的社会影响之间的联系,很少有研究检验更生态有效的概念,即这些影响可能相互作用和共同影响儿童的亲社会发展。利用这种方法将承认塑造儿童生活的动态系统。此外,采用系统的社会影响观点可能会促使使用相对复杂和创新的方法来解释这些多重影响。本期特刊的目的是强调两个或两个以上的社会化行动者(如父母、兄弟姐妹、同龄人、学校、青年组织、
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Social and Personal Relationships is an international and interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research on social and personal relationships. JSPR is the leading journal in the field, publishing empirical and theoretical papers on social and personal relationships. It is multidisciplinary in scope, drawing material from the fields of social psychology, clinical psychology, communication, developmental psychology, and sociology.