{"title":"Examining tenancy duration and exit patterns in a single-site, mixed-tenure Permanent Supportive Housing setting","authors":"S. Taylor, G. Johnson","doi":"10.1080/08882746.2021.2009734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) is recognized as an effective intervention for individuals who have experienced chronic homelessness. However, evidence of its efficacy mostly comes from scattered-site PSH. This paper investigates tenancy duration and exit patterns in a single-site, mixed-tenure PSH setting, drawing on nine years of tenancy administration data from a site in Melbourne, Australia. Our methodology combines survival and hazard analyses of tenancy records with analysis of exit reasons. We estimate that the probability of sustaining a tenancy to two years is 50% for supported tenancies and 46% for affordable tenancies. We find that of tenancies that exit, over two-thirds do so in unfavorable circumstances, and these tenancies are shorter than those that exit in favorable circumstances. We find some tenant attributes (including age and psychiatric disability) are predictors of longer tenancies, but tenancies started earlier in the site’s history were more likely to exit early. We argue that it is vital to acknowledge that people do exit PSH and to develop effective policy and practice responses to raise tenancy durations where practicable, and ensure that more people who leave do so in favorable circumstances.","PeriodicalId":52110,"journal":{"name":"Housing and Society","volume":"50 1","pages":"182 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2021.2009734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
ABSTRACT Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) is recognized as an effective intervention for individuals who have experienced chronic homelessness. However, evidence of its efficacy mostly comes from scattered-site PSH. This paper investigates tenancy duration and exit patterns in a single-site, mixed-tenure PSH setting, drawing on nine years of tenancy administration data from a site in Melbourne, Australia. Our methodology combines survival and hazard analyses of tenancy records with analysis of exit reasons. We estimate that the probability of sustaining a tenancy to two years is 50% for supported tenancies and 46% for affordable tenancies. We find that of tenancies that exit, over two-thirds do so in unfavorable circumstances, and these tenancies are shorter than those that exit in favorable circumstances. We find some tenant attributes (including age and psychiatric disability) are predictors of longer tenancies, but tenancies started earlier in the site’s history were more likely to exit early. We argue that it is vital to acknowledge that people do exit PSH and to develop effective policy and practice responses to raise tenancy durations where practicable, and ensure that more people who leave do so in favorable circumstances.
期刊介绍:
Housing and Society is the journal of the Housing Education and Research Association (HERA). The journal supports the mission of HERA by providing for the dissemination of research and other scholarly work. Submissions from a broad range of perspectives are encouraged. Topics in housing include: policy, design, social aspects, gerontology, behavioral aspects, energy/environment, equipment, interiors, economics, theory/model development, education, and program development or evaluation. The journal welcomes the submission of original research articles, notes and commentaries. Notes are shorter manuscripts presenting succinct information on housing related to one of the following categories: - Research: exploratory or not heavily theory-based or statistically analyzed - Academic: innovative teaching ideas - Program: development, implementation, and/or evaluation of Cooperative Extension or other housing programming efforts - Policy: examination of policy impact, comparative analysis, and/or need to achieve housing goals - Reviews: books, documentaries, etc.