CHILDREN AGAINST SLAVERY: JUVENILE AGENCY AND THE SUGAR BOYCOTTS IN BRITAIN

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Kathryn Gleadle, Ryan Hanley
{"title":"CHILDREN AGAINST SLAVERY: JUVENILE AGENCY AND THE SUGAR BOYCOTTS IN BRITAIN","authors":"Kathryn Gleadle, Ryan Hanley","doi":"10.1017/S0080440120000055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century Britain, many contemporaries observed a striking phenomenon: that children were especially active in the boycotts of sugar produced by enslaved people. First-hand accounts often suggested that children's activism was unilateral and unmediated, whereas historians of British abolitionism have tended to assume that children were passive recipients of antislavery literature and adult influence. Engaging with both the historiography on British abolitionism and the new histories of childhood, this article examines the nature of juvenile engagement within the sugar boycotts. Collecting together some of the extensive but dispersed evidence of juvenile antislavery across the country, and focusing upon a case study of the Plymley household of Shropshire during the early 1790s, we explore the intricacies of children's involvement. Children's agency, we argue, needs to be understood as a specific, historicised phenomenon. Adults often chose to represent children's abolitionist activities as self-determined, for their participation in the boycotts affirmed both adult positions and their own child-rearing practices. However, whilst adults frequently solicited particular types of juvenile response, children often responded independently and in unexpected ways, negotiating their own positions in relation to their parents, siblings, and peers. We situate juvenile antislavery as a recursive process, operating within complex, intergenerational interactions.","PeriodicalId":23231,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Royal Historical Society","volume":"30 1","pages":"97 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0080440120000055","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Royal Historical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080440120000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract In late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century Britain, many contemporaries observed a striking phenomenon: that children were especially active in the boycotts of sugar produced by enslaved people. First-hand accounts often suggested that children's activism was unilateral and unmediated, whereas historians of British abolitionism have tended to assume that children were passive recipients of antislavery literature and adult influence. Engaging with both the historiography on British abolitionism and the new histories of childhood, this article examines the nature of juvenile engagement within the sugar boycotts. Collecting together some of the extensive but dispersed evidence of juvenile antislavery across the country, and focusing upon a case study of the Plymley household of Shropshire during the early 1790s, we explore the intricacies of children's involvement. Children's agency, we argue, needs to be understood as a specific, historicised phenomenon. Adults often chose to represent children's abolitionist activities as self-determined, for their participation in the boycotts affirmed both adult positions and their own child-rearing practices. However, whilst adults frequently solicited particular types of juvenile response, children often responded independently and in unexpected ways, negotiating their own positions in relation to their parents, siblings, and peers. We situate juvenile antislavery as a recursive process, operating within complex, intergenerational interactions.
儿童反对奴隶制:英国的青少年机构和抵制糖
摘要在18世纪末和19世纪初的英国,许多同时代的人观察到了一个惊人的现象:儿童特别积极地抵制被奴役者生产的糖。第一手资料经常表明,儿童的行动主义是单方面的,没有经过调解,而英国废奴主义历史学家倾向于认为儿童是反奴隶制文学和成人影响的被动接受者。本文结合英国废奴主义的史学和儿童新史,探讨了抵制糖运动中青少年参与的性质。我们收集了全国各地青少年反奴隶制的一些广泛但分散的证据,并重点对17世纪90年代初什罗普郡普利姆利一家进行了案例研究,探讨了儿童参与的复杂性。我们认为,儿童能动性需要被理解为一种特定的、历史化的现象。成年人往往选择将儿童的废奴主义活动视为自决的,因为他们参与抵制活动既肯定了成年人的立场,也肯定了他们自己的育儿实践。然而,尽管成年人经常寻求特定类型的青少年反应,但儿童往往以意想不到的方式独立做出反应,协商自己与父母、兄弟姐妹和同龄人的关系。我们将青少年反奴隶制视为一个递归过程,在复杂的代际互动中运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Royal Historical Society has published the highest quality scholarship in history for over 150 years. A subscription includes a substantial annual volume of the Society’s Transactions, which presents wide-ranging reports from the front lines of historical research by both senior and younger scholars, and two volumes from the Camden Fifth Series, which makes available to a wider audience valuable primary sources that have hitherto been available only in manuscript form.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信