Fidelity of a stratified vocational advice intervention for improving return to work for workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
Rune Solli, Britt Eliniestad, Fiona Aanesen, G. Sowden, G. Wynne-Jones, M. Grotle
{"title":"Fidelity of a stratified vocational advice intervention for improving return to work for workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders","authors":"Rune Solli, Britt Eliniestad, Fiona Aanesen, G. Sowden, G. Wynne-Jones, M. Grotle","doi":"10.3233/ppr-220698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: To develop a fidelity score for the Stratified Vocational Advice Intervention (SVAI), and to evaluate associations between level of fidelity to the SVAI and number of sick leave days and work ability at six months follow-up in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). METHODS: The SVAI was provided by physiotherapists (PTs) who documented delivery in individual participant logs. A fidelity score was developed based on the number of follow-up sessions held, core questions documented, and a written action plan. Data were extracted from the logs and fidelity to the SVAI was categorised as “fully delivered\", “partially delivered, or “not delivered” based on predetermined criteria. The number of sick leave days was calculated from registry data, and work ability was assessed using a question from the Work Ability Index on current work ability compared with the lifetime best (0–10). RESULTS: 148 SVAI logs were available for fidelity evaluation (87%). The SVAI was fully delivered to 87 (56%) participants and partially delivered to 61 (39%) participants. There was no statistically significant association between level of fidelity and sick leave days (B = 5.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) –6.2, 17.7, p = 0.34) or lower work ability (B = –0.2, 95% CI –1.4, 1.1, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: A three-category fidelity score was developed and the SVAI was generally delivered according to protocol. There were no statistically significant associations between level of fidelity and number of sick leave days or work ability in participants at six months follow-up.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-220698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a fidelity score for the Stratified Vocational Advice Intervention (SVAI), and to evaluate associations between level of fidelity to the SVAI and number of sick leave days and work ability at six months follow-up in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). METHODS: The SVAI was provided by physiotherapists (PTs) who documented delivery in individual participant logs. A fidelity score was developed based on the number of follow-up sessions held, core questions documented, and a written action plan. Data were extracted from the logs and fidelity to the SVAI was categorised as “fully delivered", “partially delivered, or “not delivered” based on predetermined criteria. The number of sick leave days was calculated from registry data, and work ability was assessed using a question from the Work Ability Index on current work ability compared with the lifetime best (0–10). RESULTS: 148 SVAI logs were available for fidelity evaluation (87%). The SVAI was fully delivered to 87 (56%) participants and partially delivered to 61 (39%) participants. There was no statistically significant association between level of fidelity and sick leave days (B = 5.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) –6.2, 17.7, p = 0.34) or lower work ability (B = –0.2, 95% CI –1.4, 1.1, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: A three-category fidelity score was developed and the SVAI was generally delivered according to protocol. There were no statistically significant associations between level of fidelity and number of sick leave days or work ability in participants at six months follow-up.
分层职业咨询干预的保真度,以改善因肌肉骨骼疾病而休病假的工人的复工率
目的:制定分层职业咨询干预(SVAI)的保真度评分,并评估因肌肉骨骼疾病(MSDs)休病假的工人对SVAI的保真度水平与病假天数和六个月随访时的工作能力之间的关系。方法:SVAI由物理治疗师(PT)提供,他们在个人参与者日志中记录了分娩情况。根据举行的后续会议的次数、记录的核心问题和书面行动计划,制定了忠诚度评分。从日志中提取数据,并根据预先确定的标准将SVAI的忠诚度分为“完全交付”、“部分交付”或“未交付”。病假天数根据登记数据计算,并使用工作能力指数中关于当前工作能力与终身最佳工作能力的问题评估工作能力(0-10)结果:148个SVAI日志可用于保真度评估(87%)。SVAI全部交付给87名(56%)参与者,部分交付给61名(39%)参与者。忠诚度水平与病假天数之间没有统计学上的显著关联(B = 5.8,95%置信区间(CI)–6.2,17.7,p = 0.34)或更低的工作能力(B = –0.2,95%置信区间–1.4,1.1,p = 0.77)。结论:建立了三类保真度评分,SVAI通常根据方案进行。在六个月的随访中,参与者的忠诚度水平与病假天数或工作能力之间没有统计学上的显著关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信