Punishment, Consent, Value and Respect:

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY

Analisis Filosofico Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.36446/af.2022.416

M. Parmigiani

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present paper constitutes a critique of David Alm’s article “Punishment, Consent and Value”, in which it is argued that the consensual theory of punishment defended by C. S. Nino is false. Whilst Alm believes that this theory is grounded on an inadequate model of normative relations, here I will defend the hypothesis that such an assessment derives from an insufficient conception of human value and respect.

查看原文本刊更多论文

惩罚、同意、价值和尊重：

本文对大卫·阿尔姆的文章《惩罚、同意与价值》进行了批判，在这篇文章中，作者论证了c·s·尼诺所捍卫的惩罚的双方同意理论是错误的。虽然Alm认为这一理论是建立在一个不充分的规范关系模型的基础上的，但在这里，我将捍卫这样一个假设，即这种评估源于对人类价值和尊重的不充分的概念。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Analisis Filosofico PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

15 weeks

期刊介绍： Análisis Filosófico is an open access scientific journal issued by the Argentine Society of Philosophical Analysis (SADAF). Since 1981, it offers original and unpublished papers on theoretical and practical philosophy, discussions, critical studies and reviews –in Spanish, English and Portuguese– that contribute to the development of philosophical analysis. Essential conditions for publication are conceptual accuracy, precision and novelty. Its refereeing policy is based on double-blind reviews and external assessment. It is launched twice a year on May and November.