Dual Antibiotic Therapy with Vancomycin and Cefazolin for Surgical Prophylaxis in Total Knee Arthroplasty

A. Cohen-Rosenblum, M. Crutcher, J. Gui, W. Novicoff, Stephen J. Nelson, J. Browne
{"title":"Dual Antibiotic Therapy with Vancomycin and Cefazolin for Surgical Prophylaxis in Total Knee Arthroplasty","authors":"A. Cohen-Rosenblum, M. Crutcher, J. Gui, W. Novicoff, Stephen J. Nelson, J. Browne","doi":"10.15438/RR.8.2.212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Perioperative administration of intravenous antibiotics is a routine part of total knee arthroplasty.  Antibiotic selection is a matter of controversy, and the potential risks and benefits associated with each antibiotic selection need to be considered.  The objective of this study is to examine the effects of routine dual antibiotic prophylaxis with both cefazolin and vancomycin on infection and renal failure after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared with cefazolin alone.Methods: We performed a retrospective review of primary TKA patients for two years before and two years after routine dual antibiotic prophylaxis was implemented at our institution. 1502 patients were included (567 cefazolin-only and 935 dual prophylaxis).  Results: 2 patients (0.4%) in the cefazolin-only group had a deep surgical site infection, compared with 13 patients (1.4%) in the dual prophylaxis group (p=0.06). 46 patients (8.1%) in the cefazolin-only group had postoperative renal failure, compared with 36 patients (3.9%) in the dual prophylaxis group (p=0.0006).Discussion and Conclusion: Our results did not support the routine use of vancomycin in primary total joint arthroplasty to decrease periprosthetic joint infection. However, we also did not see any clear harm due to renal failure in the routine use of dual antibiotic prophylaxis. ","PeriodicalId":20884,"journal":{"name":"Reconstructive Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reconstructive Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15438/RR.8.2.212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Perioperative administration of intravenous antibiotics is a routine part of total knee arthroplasty.  Antibiotic selection is a matter of controversy, and the potential risks and benefits associated with each antibiotic selection need to be considered.  The objective of this study is to examine the effects of routine dual antibiotic prophylaxis with both cefazolin and vancomycin on infection and renal failure after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared with cefazolin alone.Methods: We performed a retrospective review of primary TKA patients for two years before and two years after routine dual antibiotic prophylaxis was implemented at our institution. 1502 patients were included (567 cefazolin-only and 935 dual prophylaxis).  Results: 2 patients (0.4%) in the cefazolin-only group had a deep surgical site infection, compared with 13 patients (1.4%) in the dual prophylaxis group (p=0.06). 46 patients (8.1%) in the cefazolin-only group had postoperative renal failure, compared with 36 patients (3.9%) in the dual prophylaxis group (p=0.0006).Discussion and Conclusion: Our results did not support the routine use of vancomycin in primary total joint arthroplasty to decrease periprosthetic joint infection. However, we also did not see any clear harm due to renal failure in the routine use of dual antibiotic prophylaxis. 
万古霉素和头孢唑林联合抗生素治疗全膝关节置换术预防手术
背景:围手术期静脉注射抗生素是全膝关节置换术的常规部分。抗生素的选择是一个有争议的问题,需要考虑每种抗生素选择的潜在风险和益处。本研究的目的是与单独使用头孢唑林相比,检查常规双抗生素预防用头孢唑林和万古霉素对初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)后感染和肾衰竭的影响。方法:我们对原发性TKA患者在我们机构实施常规双抗生素预防之前和之后的两年进行了回顾性审查。纳入1502名患者(567名仅头孢唑林,935名双重预防)。结果:仅使用头孢唑林组有2例(0.4%)发生深部手术部位感染,而双重预防组有13例(1.4%)发生(p=0.06)。仅使用头孢唑林组有46例(8.1%)发生术后肾功能衰竭,与双重预防组的36名患者(3.9%)相比(p=0.0006)。讨论和结论:我们的结果不支持在初次全关节置换术中常规使用万古霉素来减少假体周围关节感染。然而,在常规使用双抗生素预防中,我们也没有发现任何明显的肾衰竭危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信