Quantifying AEC professionals' cross-work culture productivity: comparison between Malaysian and UK projects during industrialized building project

IF 3.5 Q3 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Maszura Abdul Ghafar, R. Ibrahim
{"title":"Quantifying AEC professionals' cross-work culture productivity: comparison between Malaysian and UK projects during industrialized building project","authors":"Maszura Abdul Ghafar, R. Ibrahim","doi":"10.1108/sasbe-03-2023-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper discussed quantifying architect, engineer and contractor (AEC) professionals' cross-work culture productivity by comparing between Malaysian and United Kingdom (UK) projects during industrialized building project delivery. This study addressed the second part of a mixed method research design study.Design/methodology/approachThis study hypothesized that with understanding of cultural work knowledge between professionals during design phase coupled with competent technological support, productivity can be improved. It utilized Cognitive Organizational Theory (COT) protocols to test conceptual models in SimVision®. Organizational structure, project intensity, and statistical validations parameters were performed to obtain the reliability and generalization of the result.FindingsThis study found that with Building Information Modeling (BIM) technology intervention, the handling of exception, coordination and decision-making time could be improved, resulting in better project performances. The result also indicated that in choosing organizational fit, national culture factor needed to be considered; otherwise, organizational change would be unacceptable. By changing the operational process from intensive to reciprocal task intensity with BIM technology intervention, the effect on productivity would be similar to changing hierarchical organizational structure to flatter organizational structure.Research limitations/implicationsProject discrepancies issues are limitedly discussed due to companies' confidentiality. The paper only focuses on understanding the effects of human factors during the integrated project delivery phase.Practical implicationsThe findings could support developing countries' professionals to collaborate effectively with developed countries' professionals.Originality/valueThe development of the project's cultural knowledge experimentations will provide guidance to teams involved in international projects from developed and developing countries in pursuing joint ventures in project deliveries in either country successfully.","PeriodicalId":45779,"journal":{"name":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-03-2023-0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper discussed quantifying architect, engineer and contractor (AEC) professionals' cross-work culture productivity by comparing between Malaysian and United Kingdom (UK) projects during industrialized building project delivery. This study addressed the second part of a mixed method research design study.Design/methodology/approachThis study hypothesized that with understanding of cultural work knowledge between professionals during design phase coupled with competent technological support, productivity can be improved. It utilized Cognitive Organizational Theory (COT) protocols to test conceptual models in SimVision®. Organizational structure, project intensity, and statistical validations parameters were performed to obtain the reliability and generalization of the result.FindingsThis study found that with Building Information Modeling (BIM) technology intervention, the handling of exception, coordination and decision-making time could be improved, resulting in better project performances. The result also indicated that in choosing organizational fit, national culture factor needed to be considered; otherwise, organizational change would be unacceptable. By changing the operational process from intensive to reciprocal task intensity with BIM technology intervention, the effect on productivity would be similar to changing hierarchical organizational structure to flatter organizational structure.Research limitations/implicationsProject discrepancies issues are limitedly discussed due to companies' confidentiality. The paper only focuses on understanding the effects of human factors during the integrated project delivery phase.Practical implicationsThe findings could support developing countries' professionals to collaborate effectively with developed countries' professionals.Originality/valueThe development of the project's cultural knowledge experimentations will provide guidance to teams involved in international projects from developed and developing countries in pursuing joint ventures in project deliveries in either country successfully.
量化AEC专业人员的跨工作文化生产力:工业化建筑项目中马来西亚和英国项目的比较
本文通过比较马来西亚和英国(UK)在工业化建筑项目交付过程中的项目,讨论量化建筑师、工程师和承包商(AEC)专业人员的跨工作文化生产力。本研究解决了混合方法研究设计研究的第二部分。设计/方法论/方法本研究假设,在设计阶段,专业人员之间对文化工作知识的理解,加上有能力的技术支持,可以提高生产力。它利用认知组织理论(COT)协议来测试SimVision®中的概念模型。通过组织结构、项目强度和统计验证参数来获得结果的可靠性和泛化性。本研究发现,在建筑信息模型(BIM)技术的干预下,可以改善异常处理、协调和决策时间,从而提高项目绩效。结果还表明,在组织适宜度的选择中,需要考虑民族文化因素;否则,组织变革将是不可接受的。通过BIM技术的干预,将操作流程从密集型转变为相互任务强度,对生产率的影响将类似于将分层组织结构转变为扁平化组织结构。研究的局限性/意义由于公司的保密,项目差异问题的讨论有限。本文只关注于理解在集成项目交付阶段人为因素的影响。实际意义研究结果可以支持发展中国家的专业人员与发达国家的专业人员进行有效的合作。项目文化知识实验的发展将为参与发达国家和发展中国家国际项目的团队提供指导,帮助他们成功地在任何一个国家开展合资项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信