Identifying latent classes to successful AEC innovation through a survey of Finnish construction companies

IF 3.1 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Kai Hänninen, J. Juntunen, H. Haapasalo
{"title":"Identifying latent classes to successful AEC innovation through a survey of Finnish construction companies","authors":"Kai Hänninen, J. Juntunen, H. Haapasalo","doi":"10.1108/ci-01-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to describe latent classes explaining the innovation logic in the Finnish construction companies. Innovativeness is a driver of competitive performance and vital to the long-term success of any organisation and company.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing finite mixture structural equation modelling (FMSEM), the authors have classified innovation logic into latent classes. The method analyses and recognises classes for companies that have similar logic in innovation activities based on the collected data.\n\n\nFindings\nThrough FMSEM analysis, the authors have identified three latent classes that explain the innovation logic in the Finnish construction companies – LC1: the internal innovators; LC2: the non-innovation-oriented introverts; and LC3: the innovation-oriented extroverts. These three latent classes clearly capture the perceptions within the industry as well as the different characteristics and variables.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe presented latent classes explain innovation logic but is limited to analysing Finnish companies. Also, the research is quantitative by nature and does not increase the understanding in the same manner as qualitative research might capture on more specific aspects.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper presents starting points for construction industry companies to intensify innovation activities. It may also indicate more fundamental changes for the structure of construction industry organisations, especially by enabling innovation friendly culture.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study describes innovation logic in Finnish construction companies through three models (LC1–LC3) by using quantitative data analysed with the FMSEM method. The fundamental innovation challenges in the Finnish construction companies are clarified via the identified latent classes.\n","PeriodicalId":45580,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation-England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation-England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-01-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to describe latent classes explaining the innovation logic in the Finnish construction companies. Innovativeness is a driver of competitive performance and vital to the long-term success of any organisation and company. Design/methodology/approach Using finite mixture structural equation modelling (FMSEM), the authors have classified innovation logic into latent classes. The method analyses and recognises classes for companies that have similar logic in innovation activities based on the collected data. Findings Through FMSEM analysis, the authors have identified three latent classes that explain the innovation logic in the Finnish construction companies – LC1: the internal innovators; LC2: the non-innovation-oriented introverts; and LC3: the innovation-oriented extroverts. These three latent classes clearly capture the perceptions within the industry as well as the different characteristics and variables. Research limitations/implications The presented latent classes explain innovation logic but is limited to analysing Finnish companies. Also, the research is quantitative by nature and does not increase the understanding in the same manner as qualitative research might capture on more specific aspects. Practical implications This paper presents starting points for construction industry companies to intensify innovation activities. It may also indicate more fundamental changes for the structure of construction industry organisations, especially by enabling innovation friendly culture. Originality/value This study describes innovation logic in Finnish construction companies through three models (LC1–LC3) by using quantitative data analysed with the FMSEM method. The fundamental innovation challenges in the Finnish construction companies are clarified via the identified latent classes.
通过对芬兰建筑公司的调查,确定成功的AEC创新的潜在类别
目的本研究的目的是描述芬兰建筑公司中解释创新逻辑的潜在类别。创新是竞争绩效的驱动力,对任何组织和公司的长期成功都至关重要。设计/方法论/方法利用有限混合结构方程建模(FMSEM),作者将创新逻辑分为潜在类。该方法根据收集的数据分析和识别在创新活动中具有类似逻辑的公司的类别。通过FMSEM分析,作者确定了三个潜在的类别来解释芬兰建筑公司的创新逻辑——LC1:内部创新者;LC2:非创新型内向者;LC3:创新导向型外向型。这三个潜在类别清楚地反映了行业内的看法以及不同的特征和变量。研究局限性/含义所介绍的潜在类别解释了创新逻辑,但仅限于分析芬兰公司。此外,该研究本质上是定量的,并没有像定性研究可能捕捉到的更具体方面那样增加理解。实践意义本文提出了建筑业企业加强创新活动的出发点。它还可能表明建筑业组织结构发生了更根本的变化,特别是通过创造有利于创新的文化。独创性/价值本研究采用FMSEM方法分析的定量数据,通过三个模型(LC1–LC3)描述了芬兰建筑公司的创新逻辑。芬兰建筑公司面临的基本创新挑战通过确定的潜在类别得到了澄清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction Innovation-England
Construction Innovation-England CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
12.10%
发文量
71
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信