Review of the National Experience of Measuring Gender Inequality in Ukraine, 2009–2021. Part I. Government Practice of Gender Measurements

M. Skoryk
{"title":"Review of the National Experience of Measuring Gender Inequality in Ukraine, 2009–2021. Part I. Government Practice of Gender Measurements","authors":"M. Skoryk","doi":"10.31767/su.4(95)2021.04.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The review presents the national practice of measuring gender equality in Ukraine since 2009 and identifies gaps in the tools, methods and indicators used for this measurement. \nDue to the difference in the powers and responsibilities of governmental and non-governmental sectors, the first part of the review presents state practices for measuring gender inequality, and the second part presents relevant initiatives by non-governmental communities and donors. \nIt is argued that the state gender measurements in Ukraine had two active periods: 2009-2011 and 2019-2021. The first of them introduced the practice of preparing gender portraits of regions, which became widespread; and prepared a basic overview of the feasibility of creating a national system of gender statistics of Ukraine and its indicators. In the second of them, the government carried out work on standardizing the gender profiles of 25 regions of Ukraine; and the selection of gender-disaggregated indicators for nationwide monitoring of gender equality. \nIt has been established that the longest-running and most widespread national practice of gender dimension in Ukraine is gender portraiture, which was conducted in more than 2/3 of Ukraine’s regions and later spread to cities and local communities. However, tools for gender profiling and reporting on sets of advanced indicators have not become widespread. \nIt is established that the predominant type of gender measurement tool is a set of indicators, numbering about 30, grouped in 4-6 thematic areas. This set is usually determined from the available data of the State Statistics Service and is available for use in the absence of professional gender analysts. Attempts to use and disseminate more detailed sex measurement tools have failed. According to the levels of the gender measurement, national and local measurements were found to be preferred. There were no precedents for sectoral gender measurement and attempts to develop sectoral gender statistics. It is concluded that this is a gap that needs to be addressed. \nIt was found that all measurements, except for the statistical collection ‘Women and Men in Ukraine” were irregular. Measurements on the same list of indicators were carried out once or never. \nIt is concluded that there is a lack of coordination of measurement practices at the national and local levels, even if it was carried out by the same responsible state body. \nThe review was prepared within the framework of the Women’s Rights Monitoring Initiative project, implemented in 2019-2021 by the Kyiv Institute for Gender Studies with the support of the Swiss Embassy in Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":52812,"journal":{"name":"Statistika Ukrayini","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistika Ukrayini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31767/su.4(95)2021.04.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The review presents the national practice of measuring gender equality in Ukraine since 2009 and identifies gaps in the tools, methods and indicators used for this measurement. Due to the difference in the powers and responsibilities of governmental and non-governmental sectors, the first part of the review presents state practices for measuring gender inequality, and the second part presents relevant initiatives by non-governmental communities and donors. It is argued that the state gender measurements in Ukraine had two active periods: 2009-2011 and 2019-2021. The first of them introduced the practice of preparing gender portraits of regions, which became widespread; and prepared a basic overview of the feasibility of creating a national system of gender statistics of Ukraine and its indicators. In the second of them, the government carried out work on standardizing the gender profiles of 25 regions of Ukraine; and the selection of gender-disaggregated indicators for nationwide monitoring of gender equality. It has been established that the longest-running and most widespread national practice of gender dimension in Ukraine is gender portraiture, which was conducted in more than 2/3 of Ukraine’s regions and later spread to cities and local communities. However, tools for gender profiling and reporting on sets of advanced indicators have not become widespread. It is established that the predominant type of gender measurement tool is a set of indicators, numbering about 30, grouped in 4-6 thematic areas. This set is usually determined from the available data of the State Statistics Service and is available for use in the absence of professional gender analysts. Attempts to use and disseminate more detailed sex measurement tools have failed. According to the levels of the gender measurement, national and local measurements were found to be preferred. There were no precedents for sectoral gender measurement and attempts to develop sectoral gender statistics. It is concluded that this is a gap that needs to be addressed. It was found that all measurements, except for the statistical collection ‘Women and Men in Ukraine” were irregular. Measurements on the same list of indicators were carried out once or never. It is concluded that there is a lack of coordination of measurement practices at the national and local levels, even if it was carried out by the same responsible state body. The review was prepared within the framework of the Women’s Rights Monitoring Initiative project, implemented in 2019-2021 by the Kyiv Institute for Gender Studies with the support of the Swiss Embassy in Ukraine.
2009-2021年乌克兰衡量性别不平等的国家经验回顾。第一部分:性别计量的政府实践
该报告介绍了乌克兰自2009年以来衡量性别平等的国家实践,并指出了用于这一衡量的工具、方法和指标方面的差距。由于政府和非政府部门的权力和责任不同,本报告的第一部分介绍了衡量性别不平等的国家实践,第二部分介绍了非政府社区和捐助者的相关举措。有人认为,乌克兰国家性别测量有两个活跃时期:2009-2011年和2019-2021年。第一次会议介绍了编制地区性别画像的做法,这种做法变得普遍;并编写了一份关于建立乌克兰国家性别统计系统及其指标可行性的基本概述。在第二个阶段,政府开展了乌克兰25个地区性别概况标准化工作;为全国性别平等监测选择按性别分类的指标。已经确定的是,乌克兰在性别维度方面运行时间最长、最广泛的国家实践是性别肖像,在乌克兰超过三分之二的地区进行,后来传播到城市和当地社区。然而,性别概况和报告一系列先进指标的工具尚未普及。现已确定,性别衡量工具的主要类型是一套指标,大约有30个,分为4-6个专题领域。这套数据通常是根据国家统计局现有的数据确定的,在没有专业性别分析人员的情况下可以使用。使用和传播更详细的性别测量工具的尝试失败了。根据性别计量的水平,发现国家和地方计量是可取的。没有部门性别衡量的先例,也没有编制部门性别统计的尝试。结论是,这是一个需要解决的差距。调查发现,除“乌克兰妇女和男子”统计集外,所有测量都是不规则的。对同一列指标的测量要么进行一次,要么不进行。结论是,在国家和地方一级缺乏衡量做法的协调,即使是由同一负责任的国家机构进行的。该报告是在妇女权利监测倡议项目框架内编写的,该项目由基辅性别研究所在瑞士驻乌克兰大使馆的支持下于2019-2021年实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信