Correlation between the results of the three methods of RULA, REBA and QEC in assessing the ‎safety and physical health of the employees of a cable manufacturing industry

R. Hekmatshoar, Ebrahim Taban, Abareshi Fateme, Azmon Tahereh
{"title":"Correlation between the results of the three methods of RULA, REBA and QEC in assessing the ‎safety and physical health of the employees of a cable manufacturing industry","authors":"R. Hekmatshoar, Ebrahim Taban, Abareshi Fateme, Azmon Tahereh","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: This study is focused safety and physical health on posture analysis of tools RULA, REBA and ‎QEC were used a cable manufacturing company workers. ‎ Methods: The study was conducted on 40 workers engaged in different process of manufacturing. The ‎different activities of the workers were recorded by video and still photography, and these ‎images were used for analysis. Posture analysis tools RULA, REBA and QEC were used. ‎ Results: The results of RULA showed that about 30% of the workers were under high risk level and ‎needed a necessary action immediately. About 37.5% of the workers were under medium risk ‎levels and about 25% of the workers were at lower risk levels. The results of REBA have shown ‎that about 27.5% of the workers were under very high risk levels and required immediate ‎change. About 35% of the workers were at high risk levels and a change is necessary soon, and ‎‎32.5% of the workers were at medium risk levels. According to the QEC method of assessment, ‎it was found that 7.5 of the workers needed no corrective measures. About 35% of the workers ‎needed additional examination and 32.5% of the workers were at high risk and required ‎immediate change. It can be concluded that there are ergonomic deficiencies in the planning ‎and work approaches. A significant proportion of the workers are working in high risk postures. ‎Therefore, the workers are under moderate to high risk of WMSDs. ‎ Conclusions: The current study suggested a suitable implementation of ergonomics interventions program ‎with awareness and training among workers to reduce the risks of WMSD.‎ Keywords: Posture analysis, WMSD, Cable factory ‎","PeriodicalId":32422,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Injury and Violence Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Injury and Violence Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background: This study is focused safety and physical health on posture analysis of tools RULA, REBA and ‎QEC were used a cable manufacturing company workers. ‎ Methods: The study was conducted on 40 workers engaged in different process of manufacturing. The ‎different activities of the workers were recorded by video and still photography, and these ‎images were used for analysis. Posture analysis tools RULA, REBA and QEC were used. ‎ Results: The results of RULA showed that about 30% of the workers were under high risk level and ‎needed a necessary action immediately. About 37.5% of the workers were under medium risk ‎levels and about 25% of the workers were at lower risk levels. The results of REBA have shown ‎that about 27.5% of the workers were under very high risk levels and required immediate ‎change. About 35% of the workers were at high risk levels and a change is necessary soon, and ‎‎32.5% of the workers were at medium risk levels. According to the QEC method of assessment, ‎it was found that 7.5 of the workers needed no corrective measures. About 35% of the workers ‎needed additional examination and 32.5% of the workers were at high risk and required ‎immediate change. It can be concluded that there are ergonomic deficiencies in the planning ‎and work approaches. A significant proportion of the workers are working in high risk postures. ‎Therefore, the workers are under moderate to high risk of WMSDs. ‎ Conclusions: The current study suggested a suitable implementation of ergonomics interventions program ‎with awareness and training among workers to reduce the risks of WMSD.‎ Keywords: Posture analysis, WMSD, Cable factory ‎
RULA、REBA和QEC三种方法在评估‎电缆制造业员工的安全和身体健康
摘要:背景:本研究的重点是RULA、REBA和‎QEC曾是一家电缆制造公司的工人。‎ 方法:对40名从事不同生产工艺的工人进行调查研究。这个‎工人们的不同活动被录像和静态摄影记录下来‎使用图像进行分析。使用了姿态分析工具RULA、REBA和QEC。‎ 结果:RULA结果显示,约30%的工人处于高风险水平‎需要立即采取必要的行动。约37.5%的工人处于中等风险之下‎大约25%的工人处于较低的风险水平。REBA的结果显示‎大约27.5%的工人处于非常高的风险水平下,需要立即‎改变大约35%的工人处于高风险水平,有必要尽快做出改变‎‎32.5%的工人处于中等风险水平。根据QEC评估方法,‎发现7.5名工人不需要采取纠正措施。约35%的工人‎需要额外检查,32.5%的工人处于高危状态,需要‎立即改变。可以得出结论,规划中存在人体工程学方面的不足‎以及工作方法。很大一部分工人处于高风险状态。‎因此,工人患WMSD的风险为中到高。‎ 结论:目前的研究建议适当实施人体工程学干预计划‎通过员工的意识和培训来降低WMSD的风险。‎ 关键词:姿势分析,WMSD,电缆厂‎
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Injury and Violence Research (JIVR) is a peer-reviewed open-access medical journal covering all aspects of traumatology includes quantitative and qualitative studies in the field of clinical and basic sciences about trauma, burns, drowning, falls, occupational/road/ sport safety, youth violence, child/elder abuse, child/elder injuries, intimate partner abuse/sexual violence, self-harm, suicide, patient safety, safe communities, consumer safety, disaster management, terrorism, surveillance/burden of injury and all other intentional and unintentional injuries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信