State Responsibility and Accountability in UN Peacekeeping: The Case of The Mothers of Srebrenica v. The Netherlands

IF 1.5 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Tamer Morris
{"title":"State Responsibility and Accountability in UN Peacekeeping: The Case of The Mothers of Srebrenica v. The Netherlands","authors":"Tamer Morris","doi":"10.1080/13533312.2021.1989304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The legal immunity of the UN has focused the peacekeeping literature on individual accountability and the political willingness of States to prosecute their own. UN immunity applies to peacekeeping operations only when the UN is in effective control. When a State is exerting effective control over its contingent, either solely or jointly, the actions of peacekeepers will be attributed to that State. When States are in effective control, they cannot rely on UN immunity for breaches of their obligations. Once a State is exercising effective control, it must warrant that sufficient mechanisms are undertaken to fulfil its obligations under the law, specifically the extra-territorial nature of international human rights law. The Mothers of Srebrenica case highlights that peacekeeping accountability is not limited to the prosecution of individual peacekeepers. Although UN immunity limits specific avenues of legal recourse, it does not prevent victims from seeking accountability from Troop Contributing Countries.","PeriodicalId":47231,"journal":{"name":"International Peacekeeping","volume":"29 1","pages":"204 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Peacekeeping","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2021.1989304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The legal immunity of the UN has focused the peacekeeping literature on individual accountability and the political willingness of States to prosecute their own. UN immunity applies to peacekeeping operations only when the UN is in effective control. When a State is exerting effective control over its contingent, either solely or jointly, the actions of peacekeepers will be attributed to that State. When States are in effective control, they cannot rely on UN immunity for breaches of their obligations. Once a State is exercising effective control, it must warrant that sufficient mechanisms are undertaken to fulfil its obligations under the law, specifically the extra-territorial nature of international human rights law. The Mothers of Srebrenica case highlights that peacekeeping accountability is not limited to the prosecution of individual peacekeepers. Although UN immunity limits specific avenues of legal recourse, it does not prevent victims from seeking accountability from Troop Contributing Countries.
联合国维持和平行动中的国家责任和问责:斯雷布雷尼察母亲诉荷兰案
联合国的法律豁免权使维和文献聚焦于个人问责和各国起诉自己国家的政治意愿。只有在联合国有效控制下,联合国豁免才适用于维持和平行动。当一个国家单独或共同对其特遣队实施有效控制时,维持和平人员的行动将归于该国。当国家处于有效控制之下时,它们不能依赖联合国对违反其义务的豁免。一国一旦实行有效控制,就必须保证采取充分的机制来履行法律规定的义务,特别是国际人权法的治外法权性质。“斯雷布雷尼察之母”一案突出表明,维持和平问责不仅限于起诉个别维和人员。虽然联合国豁免限制了诉诸法律的具体途径,但这并不妨碍受害者向部队派遣国追究责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Peacekeeping
International Peacekeeping INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.40%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信