Lexical bundles from one century to the next

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Rachel Allan
{"title":"Lexical bundles from one century to the next","authors":"Rachel Allan","doi":"10.1075/JHP.00017.ALL","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This corpus study compares lexical bundles found in the language input of a selection of historical and current\n English language teaching materials to see what insights they can give into changes in spoken language use. English teaching texts\n published between 1905 and 1917 were used to construct a historical corpus, and a collection of English language self-study texts\n published between 2004 and 2014 were used for comparison. Both groups of texts focused on spoken language. The most frequent\n three-word lexical bundles extracted from each corpus varied considerably. The contemporary texts showed both a greater use of\n formulaic language and more syntactic complexity within it, while the historical texts relied on simpler structures. An\n exploratory analysis of the lexical bundles in the historical texts suggests, however, that viewed in conjunction with other\n historical sources, they can assist in building a picture of spoken language use of the period.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/JHP.00017.ALL","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHP.00017.ALL","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This corpus study compares lexical bundles found in the language input of a selection of historical and current English language teaching materials to see what insights they can give into changes in spoken language use. English teaching texts published between 1905 and 1917 were used to construct a historical corpus, and a collection of English language self-study texts published between 2004 and 2014 were used for comparison. Both groups of texts focused on spoken language. The most frequent three-word lexical bundles extracted from each corpus varied considerably. The contemporary texts showed both a greater use of formulaic language and more syntactic complexity within it, while the historical texts relied on simpler structures. An exploratory analysis of the lexical bundles in the historical texts suggests, however, that viewed in conjunction with other historical sources, they can assist in building a picture of spoken language use of the period.
从一个世纪到下一个世纪的词汇集
这项语料库研究比较了一些历史和当前英语教材的语言输入中发现的词汇束,以了解它们对口语使用的变化有什么见解。使用1905年至1917年出版的英语教学文本构建历史语料库,并使用2004年至2014年出版的英文自学文本集进行比较。两组文本都侧重于口语。从每个语料库中提取的最常见的三个词的词束变化很大。当代文本显示出公式化语言的更多使用和语法的复杂性,而历史文本则依赖于更简单的结构。然而,对历史文本中的词汇束的探索性分析表明,结合其他历史来源来看,它们可以帮助构建该时期口语使用的图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信