A Comparative Study of Intramuscular Ketamine and a Combination of Intramuscular Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine as Premedication in Paediatric Anesthesia

Riya Singh, Barkha Pradhan
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Intramuscular Ketamine and a Combination of Intramuscular Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine as Premedication in Paediatric Anesthesia","authors":"Riya Singh, Barkha Pradhan","doi":"10.3126/bjhs.v8i1.57289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Preoperative anxiety is an issue of concern in paediatric anaesthesia practice. Forceful transfer of children into the operating room can cause long-term psychological trauma. This clinical study compares intramuscular ketamine and a combination of intramuscular dexmedetomidine and ketamine as anaesthetic premedicants in terms of +anxiolysis, sedation and ease of IV cannulation. \nObjectives: To compare the level of preoperative anxiety, sedation and ease of cannulation following premedication between intramuscular ketamine and a combination of intramuscular dexmedetomidine and ketamine. \nMethods:  Total of 60 patients belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I-II, in the age group of two to ten years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia were included in the study; Group A patients received ketamine 3mg/kg body weight while Group B patients received ketamine 2mg/kg body weight and dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg body weight intramuscular. The outcome variables were sedation score (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale), IV cannula acceptance (IV cannula Acceptance Score), and parental separation (Separation Score). \nResults: The groups were comparable in patient characteristics and hemodynamic parameters between the groups. Median (IQR) sedation score at 10 min were -1 (-2—0) and 0(-1—1) (p< 0.001); mean parental separation scores were 3.76± 0.43 and 3.36±0.55 (p< 0.001); IV cannula acceptance score were 3.73±0.44 and 4.53±7.27 (p= 0.001) in Group A and Group B respectively. \nConclusion:  Combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine is superior to ketamine alone in terms of sedation at 15 min and ease of IV cannulation but comparable in terms of anxiolysis.","PeriodicalId":31640,"journal":{"name":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/bjhs.v8i1.57289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Preoperative anxiety is an issue of concern in paediatric anaesthesia practice. Forceful transfer of children into the operating room can cause long-term psychological trauma. This clinical study compares intramuscular ketamine and a combination of intramuscular dexmedetomidine and ketamine as anaesthetic premedicants in terms of +anxiolysis, sedation and ease of IV cannulation. Objectives: To compare the level of preoperative anxiety, sedation and ease of cannulation following premedication between intramuscular ketamine and a combination of intramuscular dexmedetomidine and ketamine. Methods:  Total of 60 patients belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I-II, in the age group of two to ten years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia were included in the study; Group A patients received ketamine 3mg/kg body weight while Group B patients received ketamine 2mg/kg body weight and dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg body weight intramuscular. The outcome variables were sedation score (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale), IV cannula acceptance (IV cannula Acceptance Score), and parental separation (Separation Score). Results: The groups were comparable in patient characteristics and hemodynamic parameters between the groups. Median (IQR) sedation score at 10 min were -1 (-2—0) and 0(-1—1) (p< 0.001); mean parental separation scores were 3.76± 0.43 and 3.36±0.55 (p< 0.001); IV cannula acceptance score were 3.73±0.44 and 4.53±7.27 (p= 0.001) in Group A and Group B respectively. Conclusion:  Combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine is superior to ketamine alone in terms of sedation at 15 min and ease of IV cannulation but comparable in terms of anxiolysis.
肌内氯胺酮与肌内右美托咪定和氯胺酮联合用药用于小儿麻醉的比较研究
引言:术前焦虑是儿科麻醉实践中值得关注的问题。强行将儿童转移到手术室会造成长期的心理创伤。本临床研究比较了肌内氯胺酮与肌内右美托咪定和氯胺酮作为麻醉前药在+焦虑、镇静和易静脉插管方面的作用。目的:比较肌内注射氯胺酮与肌内注射右美托咪定和氯胺酮联合用药的术前焦虑、镇静和术前插管容易程度。方法:共有60名患者属于美国麻醉师协会,身体状况为I-II,年龄在2至10岁之间,计划在全身麻醉下进行选择性手术;A组接受氯胺酮3mg/kg体重,B组接受氯胺酮2mg/kg体重和右美托咪定1mcg/kg体重肌肉注射。结果变量为镇静评分(Richmond激动镇静量表)、静脉插管接受度(静脉插管接受评分)和父母分离度(分离评分)。结果:两组在患者特征和血液动力学参数方面具有可比性。10分钟时的中位(IQR)镇静评分分别为-1(-2-0)和0(-1-1)(p<0.001);父母分离平均得分分别为3.76±0.43和3.36±0.55(p<0.001);A组和B组的静脉插管接受度评分分别为3.73±0.44和4.53±7.27(p=0.001)。结论:右美托咪定和氯胺酮联合用药在15分钟的镇静作用和静脉插管的简易性方面优于单独使用氯胺酮,但在抗焦虑方面具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信