The dancing image in India, England, and the Caribbean, 1770–1870

Q1 Arts and Humanities
J. Cooper
{"title":"The dancing image in India, England, and the Caribbean, 1770–1870","authors":"J. Cooper","doi":"10.1086/711595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the visual culture of empire between 1770 and 1870 a new species of image emerged that showed the figure in states of extraordinary metamorphosis. These “dancing images” showed the figure in a state of metamorphosis not out of a newly accomplished representational approach to solving the persistent problem in art of how to translate the movements of a three-dimensional body to a two-dimensional picture plane but rather because these images broke apart in the attempt at doing so. The edges of the figure’s fragmented pieces shivered with the passing of embodied energies that the dancing image had only partially succeeded in arresting. The history of such images is not a history of the picturesque; it is a history of that which cannot be pictured—a history, as it were, of the picture-non-esque, that which cannot be arrested by “the tight weave of signifiers” composing the aesthetic text. Convulsed in motion, these dancing images work as new historiographical operators revealing the interlocking histories of the body and of art in the era of British colonial expansion. The period under consideration begins with the dissemination of artists, military draftsmen, networks of native artists, colonial patronage systems, and image-making apparatuses (printing presses, photographic equipment) across the “imperial meridian” and concludes with the onset of chronophotography and film, which took over as the most progressive ontological medium for exploring the problem of representing movement in images post1870. The history of art during this period must, then, be written not as the progress and development of the picturesque style but rather as a fraught history of the attempts to represent the energetic movement of bodies in antagonism with each other and with the world. Such a history indicates that there is a missing episode in this story between the spectacular, multimedia art of the","PeriodicalId":39613,"journal":{"name":"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics","volume":"73-74 1","pages":"94 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/711595","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/711595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the visual culture of empire between 1770 and 1870 a new species of image emerged that showed the figure in states of extraordinary metamorphosis. These “dancing images” showed the figure in a state of metamorphosis not out of a newly accomplished representational approach to solving the persistent problem in art of how to translate the movements of a three-dimensional body to a two-dimensional picture plane but rather because these images broke apart in the attempt at doing so. The edges of the figure’s fragmented pieces shivered with the passing of embodied energies that the dancing image had only partially succeeded in arresting. The history of such images is not a history of the picturesque; it is a history of that which cannot be pictured—a history, as it were, of the picture-non-esque, that which cannot be arrested by “the tight weave of signifiers” composing the aesthetic text. Convulsed in motion, these dancing images work as new historiographical operators revealing the interlocking histories of the body and of art in the era of British colonial expansion. The period under consideration begins with the dissemination of artists, military draftsmen, networks of native artists, colonial patronage systems, and image-making apparatuses (printing presses, photographic equipment) across the “imperial meridian” and concludes with the onset of chronophotography and film, which took over as the most progressive ontological medium for exploring the problem of representing movement in images post1870. The history of art during this period must, then, be written not as the progress and development of the picturesque style but rather as a fraught history of the attempts to represent the energetic movement of bodies in antagonism with each other and with the world. Such a history indicates that there is a missing episode in this story between the spectacular, multimedia art of the
1770–1870年,印度、英国和加勒比海地区的舞蹈形象
在1770年至1870年间的帝国视觉文化中,出现了一种新的图像,显示了这个人物处于非同寻常的蜕变状态。这些“跳舞的图像”显示了人物的变形状态,这并不是因为一种新完成的具象方法来解决艺术中如何将三维物体的运动转化为二维图像平面的持久问题,而是因为这些图像在尝试这样做的过程中分裂了。人物碎片的边缘随着具体能量的流逝而颤抖,而舞蹈形象只是部分成功地吸引了这些能量。这样的图像的历史不是风景如画的历史;这是一部无法描绘的历史——一部画面非风格的历史,一部无法被构成美学文本的“能指的紧密编织”所束缚的历史。在运动中,这些舞蹈图像作为新的历史操作者,揭示了英国殖民扩张时代身体和艺术的相互关联的历史。所审议的时期始于艺术家、军事绘图员、本土艺术家网络、殖民赞助制度和图像制作设备(印刷机、摄影设备)在“帝国子午线”上的传播,并以计时摄影和电影的出现而结束,它在1870年后成为探索图像中运动表现问题的最进步的本体论媒介。因此,这一时期的艺术史不能被写为风景如画风格的进步和发展,而应该被写为一部充满活力的历史,试图表现身体在相互对抗和与世界对抗中的运动。这样的历史表明,在这个故事中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics
Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Res is a journal of anthropology and comparative aesthetics dedicated to the study of the object, in particular cult and belief objects and objects of art. The journal brings together, in an anthropological perspective, contributions by philosophers, art historians, archaeologists, critics, linguists, architects, artists, and others. Its field of inquiry is open to all cultures, regions, and historical periods. Res also seeks to make available textual and iconographic documents of importance for the history and theory of the arts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信