Nāgārjuna and the concept of time

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES

ASIAN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/09552367.2021.1882723

A. K. Jayesh

引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The paper focuses on Nāgārjuna, the founder of the middle way school of Mahāyāna Buddhism. It argues that while Nāgārjuna’s rejection of the notion of ontological independence is justified and correct, his philosophical project is incomplete. This stems from the fact that Nāgārjuna’s rejection of the Abhidharma conception of time is not supplemented with the development of an alternative. The paper insists that Nāgārjuna’s endorsement of the doctrine of impermanence without first developing a non-foundationalist conception of time is indefensible. The paper concludes by offering a description of the nature of time which, it submits, will complete the Madhyamaka project.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Nāgārjuna和时间的概念

摘要本文以马赫纳中道学派创始人纳迦尔朱纳为研究对象。它认为，虽然Nāgārjuna拒绝本体论独立性的概念是合理和正确的，但他的哲学计划是不完整的。这源于这样一个事实，即Nāgārjuna对阿披陀罗时间概念的拒绝并没有得到替代方案的发展。该论文坚持认为，Nāgārjuna在没有首先发展出非基础主义的时间概念的情况下对无常学说的认可是站不住脚的。论文最后对时间的性质进行了描述，它认为时间将完成Madhyamaka项目。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

ASIAN PHILOSOPHY Multiple-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Asian Philosophy is an international journal concerned with such philosophical traditions as Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Buddhist and Islamic. The purpose of the journal is to bring these rich and varied traditions to a worldwide academic audience. It publishes articles in the central philosophical areas of metaphysics, philosophy of mind, epistemology, logic, moral and social philosophy, as well as in applied philosophical areas such as aesthetics and jurisprudence. It also publishes articles comparing Eastern and Western philosophical traditions.