Conceptual commentary of public spaces in Durban, South Africa

IF 0.6 Q4 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING
M. Cloete, Salena Yusuf
{"title":"Conceptual commentary of public spaces in Durban, South Africa","authors":"M. Cloete, Salena Yusuf","doi":"10.18820/2415-0495/TRP73.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the context of African cities that are considered to have poor economic prospects and are failing its inhabitants, this article explores and assesses the quality of Durban’s open public spaces through a phenomenological lens, by applying the concept of the sociality of public space and drawing on different theorists’ ideas of what constitutes a good open public space. Various factors have led to the corrosion of open public spaces, including modernism and globalisation and their resultant effects as well as spatial apartheid in South Africa. The following theories are used to understand open public spaces: Jacob’s “eyes on the street”, which supports safer public spaces; Massey’s theory of thrown-togetherness, which advocates for a range of different elements present in public spaces, and Parkinson’s democracy of public space, which encompasses the way in which people express themselves in public spaces. The research methodology includes a literature review, phenomenological ethnographic observations, mapping, and drawing with written narrative. The spaces considered in the study include a range of Durban’s successful and less successful public spaces, including the beachfront, parks, gardens, and a public square. The article concludes that open public spaces are a necessity for quality civic life and are still considered a luxury in Africa. Keywords : Durban open public spaces, sociality, thrown-togetherness, democracy of space","PeriodicalId":42151,"journal":{"name":"Town and Regional Planning","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Town and Regional Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/2415-0495/TRP73.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Within the context of African cities that are considered to have poor economic prospects and are failing its inhabitants, this article explores and assesses the quality of Durban’s open public spaces through a phenomenological lens, by applying the concept of the sociality of public space and drawing on different theorists’ ideas of what constitutes a good open public space. Various factors have led to the corrosion of open public spaces, including modernism and globalisation and their resultant effects as well as spatial apartheid in South Africa. The following theories are used to understand open public spaces: Jacob’s “eyes on the street”, which supports safer public spaces; Massey’s theory of thrown-togetherness, which advocates for a range of different elements present in public spaces, and Parkinson’s democracy of public space, which encompasses the way in which people express themselves in public spaces. The research methodology includes a literature review, phenomenological ethnographic observations, mapping, and drawing with written narrative. The spaces considered in the study include a range of Durban’s successful and less successful public spaces, including the beachfront, parks, gardens, and a public square. The article concludes that open public spaces are a necessity for quality civic life and are still considered a luxury in Africa. Keywords : Durban open public spaces, sociality, thrown-togetherness, democracy of space
南非德班公共空间的概念评论
在被认为经济前景不佳、辜负了居民的非洲城市的背景下,本文通过现象学的视角,运用公共空间社会性的概念,并借鉴不同理论家关于什么是好的开放公共空间的观点,探索和评估了德班开放公共空间的质量。各种因素导致了开放公共空间的腐蚀,包括现代主义和全球化及其后果,以及南非的空间种族隔离。以下理论被用来理解开放的公共空间:雅各布的“街道上的眼睛”,它支持更安全的公共空间;Massey的“团结”理论主张公共空间中存在一系列不同的元素,以及Parkinson的公共空间民主,包括人们在公共空间中表达自己的方式。研究方法包括文献综述、现象学民族学观察、地图绘制和书面叙事绘画。研究中考虑的空间包括德班一系列成功和不太成功的公共空间,包括海滨、公园、花园和公共广场。文章的结论是,开放的公共空间是优质公民生活的必需品,在非洲仍然被视为奢侈品。关键词:德班开放式公共空间、社会性、团结性、空间民主
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Town and Regional Planning
Town and Regional Planning REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信