Macular thickness in diabetic retinopathy without clinically significant macular edema

Q4 Medicine
Krishna A. Rao, R. Chandra, L. Rao, S. Shailaja, M. Hazarika
{"title":"Macular thickness in diabetic retinopathy without clinically significant macular edema","authors":"Krishna A. Rao, R. Chandra, L. Rao, S. Shailaja, M. Hazarika","doi":"10.35119/asjoo.v16i2.353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To measure macular thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in various grades of diabetic retinopathy with no clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and its comparison with non-diabetics. \nDesign: Prospective cross–sectional study. \nMethods: Macular thickness was measured by OCT in 72 healthy volunteers (107 control eyes), 45 patients with mild and moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (78 eyes) and 37 patients with severe NPDR and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (66 eyes). Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) as assessed by stereoscopic evaluation or photographs were excluded. One-way ANOVA test to compare the mean thickness and Tukey's test for multiple comparison between groups were used. \nResults: Central subfield thickness (CST) was 238.57 ± 25.077 µm, 251.22 ± 24.649 µm, and 270.45 ± 28.956 µm in the three groups respectively. As the severity of retinopathy increased, the macular thickness significantly increased (p = < 0.001) in all the nine zones on OCT. There was a significant increase in CST noted in all the grades of retinopathy when compared with non-diabetics (p = 0.004, p = < 0.0001). No significant difference in macular thickness was noted between genders, irrespective of their groups (p = 0.72), or between the three groups in all the nine zones (p = 0.609). \nConclusion: There is a significant increase in CST in all grades of retinopathy, as well as with increasing severity of retinopathy when compared to non-diabetics. This warrants the need to obtain OCT measurements even in patients with moderate NPDR without CSME to rule out subclinical DME.","PeriodicalId":39864,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35119/asjoo.v16i2.353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To measure macular thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in various grades of diabetic retinopathy with no clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and its comparison with non-diabetics. Design: Prospective cross–sectional study. Methods: Macular thickness was measured by OCT in 72 healthy volunteers (107 control eyes), 45 patients with mild and moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (78 eyes) and 37 patients with severe NPDR and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (66 eyes). Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) as assessed by stereoscopic evaluation or photographs were excluded. One-way ANOVA test to compare the mean thickness and Tukey's test for multiple comparison between groups were used. Results: Central subfield thickness (CST) was 238.57 ± 25.077 µm, 251.22 ± 24.649 µm, and 270.45 ± 28.956 µm in the three groups respectively. As the severity of retinopathy increased, the macular thickness significantly increased (p = < 0.001) in all the nine zones on OCT. There was a significant increase in CST noted in all the grades of retinopathy when compared with non-diabetics (p = 0.004, p = < 0.0001). No significant difference in macular thickness was noted between genders, irrespective of their groups (p = 0.72), or between the three groups in all the nine zones (p = 0.609). Conclusion: There is a significant increase in CST in all grades of retinopathy, as well as with increasing severity of retinopathy when compared to non-diabetics. This warrants the need to obtain OCT measurements even in patients with moderate NPDR without CSME to rule out subclinical DME.
无明显黄斑水肿的糖尿病视网膜病变的黄斑厚度
目的:利用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)测量不同级别无明显黄斑水肿的糖尿病视网膜病变患者的黄斑厚度,并与非糖尿病患者进行比较。设计:前瞻性横断面研究。方法:采用OCT测量健康志愿者72例(对照107眼)、轻、中度非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)患者45例(78眼)和重度非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)患者37例(66眼)的黄斑厚度。通过立体评价或照片评估的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者被排除在外。平均厚度比较采用单因素方差分析,组间多组比较采用Tukey检验。结果:三组患者中心子野厚度(CST)分别为238.57±25.077µm、251.22±24.649µm、270.45±28.956µm。随着视网膜病变严重程度的增加,10月所有九个区域的黄斑厚度均显著增加(p = < 0.001)。与非糖尿病患者相比,所有视网膜病变级别的CST均显著增加(p = 0.004, p = < 0.0001)。性别间黄斑厚度无显著差异,无论其组(p = 0.72),或三组之间在所有九个区域(p = 0.609)。结论:与非糖尿病患者相比,CST在所有级别的视网膜病变中都有显著增加,而且视网膜病变的严重程度也在增加。这就保证了即使在中度NPDR无CSME的患者中也需要进行OCT测量以排除亚临床DME。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Ophthalmology
Asian Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of OPHTHALMOLOGY is the official peer-reviewed journal of the South East Asia Glaucoma Interest Group (SEAGIG) and is indexed in EMBASE/Excerpta Medica. Asian Journal of OPHTHALMOLOGY is published quarterly (four [4] issues per year) by Scientific Communications International Limited. The journal is published on-line only and is distributed free of cost via the SEAGIG website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信