Experiences of older adults and undergraduate students in co-creating age-friendly services in an educational living lab

A. Berg, B. Dewar, C. Smits, J. Jukema
{"title":"Experiences of older adults and undergraduate students in co-creating age-friendly services in an educational living lab","authors":"A. Berg, B. Dewar, C. Smits, J. Jukema","doi":"10.19043/ipdj.92.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the purposes of an undergraduate programme in gerontology is to facilitate future professionals’ development of co-creation competences. A newly designed living lab serves as a powerful learning environment, where students and older adults can work together in creating agefriendly services and products. Aim: The aim of this study is to gain insight into the shared experiences of older adults and students in co-creating age-friendly services in an educational living lab. Methods: The living lab and subsequently the research was informed by appreciative inquiry. The study has a qualitative, explorative and multistage design, with a six-stage alternating process of data collection and analysis. Data were collected from six individual interviews (three older adults and three students) followed by two group interviews with two other older adults and four other students. Data analysis resulted in a shared story of working together in the living lab. Findings: The co-creation experiences of older adults and students are highlighted in a rich and meaningful narrative. A shared narrative has been constructed from both perspectives, older adults and students. There are three central themes: working together, our learning experiences and our best experience. This rich and meaningful narrative stresses the importance of building a relationship to foster co-creation and uncertainty as beneficial to equality and shared responsibility. Conclusion: Co-creation in an educational context is meaningful to older adults and students. Appreciative inquiry in both the research and practice of the living lab can facilitate relationship equality, which is highly valued by participants. Implications for practice: • A co-creation approach in a living lab results in experiences of equality for both students and older adults • Successful co-creation relies on investment in time and energy, and allowance of uncertainty • Older adults bring valuable skills and expertise into age-friendly service design, challenging ageist assumptions","PeriodicalId":30387,"journal":{"name":"International Practice Development Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Practice Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.92.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: One of the purposes of an undergraduate programme in gerontology is to facilitate future professionals’ development of co-creation competences. A newly designed living lab serves as a powerful learning environment, where students and older adults can work together in creating agefriendly services and products. Aim: The aim of this study is to gain insight into the shared experiences of older adults and students in co-creating age-friendly services in an educational living lab. Methods: The living lab and subsequently the research was informed by appreciative inquiry. The study has a qualitative, explorative and multistage design, with a six-stage alternating process of data collection and analysis. Data were collected from six individual interviews (three older adults and three students) followed by two group interviews with two other older adults and four other students. Data analysis resulted in a shared story of working together in the living lab. Findings: The co-creation experiences of older adults and students are highlighted in a rich and meaningful narrative. A shared narrative has been constructed from both perspectives, older adults and students. There are three central themes: working together, our learning experiences and our best experience. This rich and meaningful narrative stresses the importance of building a relationship to foster co-creation and uncertainty as beneficial to equality and shared responsibility. Conclusion: Co-creation in an educational context is meaningful to older adults and students. Appreciative inquiry in both the research and practice of the living lab can facilitate relationship equality, which is highly valued by participants. Implications for practice: • A co-creation approach in a living lab results in experiences of equality for both students and older adults • Successful co-creation relies on investment in time and energy, and allowance of uncertainty • Older adults bring valuable skills and expertise into age-friendly service design, challenging ageist assumptions
老年人和本科生在教育生活实验室共同创建老年友好服务的经验
背景:老年学本科课程的目的之一是促进未来专业人员共同创造能力的发展。新设计的生活实验室作为一个强大的学习环境,学生和老年人可以一起工作,创造适合老年人的服务和产品。目的:本研究的目的是了解老年人和学生在教育生活实验室共同创造老年人友好服务的共同经验。方法:采用欣赏式问询的方式,对生活实验室和随后的研究进行通报。本研究采用定性、探索性和多阶段设计,数据收集和分析交替进行六个阶段。数据收集自6个个人访谈(3个老年人和3个学生),随后是2个小组访谈(2个老年人和4个学生)。数据分析产生了一个在生活实验室中一起工作的共享故事。研究发现:老年人和学生的共同创造经历在丰富而有意义的叙述中被突出。从老年人和学生两个角度构建了一个共同的叙述。有三个中心主题:一起工作,我们的学习经历和我们最好的经历。这种丰富而有意义的叙述强调了建立一种关系以促进共同创造和不确定性的重要性,这有利于平等和分担责任。结论:教育情境下的共同创造对老年人和学生都有意义。在生活实验室的研究和实践中,欣赏式探究都可以促进关系平等,这是参与者所高度重视的。对实践的启示:•在生活实验室中共同创造的方法为学生和老年人带来了平等的体验•成功的共同创造依赖于时间和精力的投入,并允许不确定性•老年人为老年人友好的服务设计带来了宝贵的技能和专业知识,挑战了年龄歧视的假设
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信