Responses of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to straw return and nitrogen fertilizer reduction in a rainfed maize field

IF 5.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Zhenling PENG , Hao XI , Lin MAO , Huyuan FENG , Jianjun ZHANG , Yongjun LIU
{"title":"Responses of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to straw return and nitrogen fertilizer reduction in a rainfed maize field","authors":"Zhenling PENG ,&nbsp;Hao XI ,&nbsp;Lin MAO ,&nbsp;Huyuan FENG ,&nbsp;Jianjun ZHANG ,&nbsp;Yongjun LIU","doi":"10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Straw return can be used to reduce fertilizer input and improve agricultural sustainability and soil health. However, how straw return and reduced fertilizer application affect beneficial soil microbes, particularly arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), remains poorly understood. Here, we conducted a five-year field experiment in a rainfed maize field on the Loess Plateau of northwestern China. We tested four treatments with straw return combined with four nitrogen (N) application rates, <em>i.e</em>., 100%, 80%, 60%, and 0% of the common N application rate (225 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>) in this region, and two reference treatments (full or no N application), with three replicates for each treatment. Mycorrhizal colonization was quantified and AMF communities colonizing maize roots were characterized using Illumina sequencing. Forty virtual taxa (VTs) of AMF were identified in root samples, among which VT113 (related to <em>Rhizophagus fasciculatus</em>) and VT156 (related to <em>Dominikia gansuensis</em>) were the predominant taxa. Both root length colonization and AMF VT richness were sensitive to N fertilization, but not to straw return; furthermore, both gradually increased with decreasing N application rate. The VT composition of the AMF community was also affected by N fertilization, but not by straw return, and the community variation could be well explained by soil available N and phosphorus concentrations. Additionally, 60%, 80%, and full N fertilization produced similar maize yields. Thus, our study revealed the response patterns of AMF to straw return and N fertilizer reduction and showed that straw return combined with N fertilizer reduction may be a promising practice to maintain mycorrhizal symbiosis concomitantly with crop productivity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49709,"journal":{"name":"Pedosphere","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 351-360"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedosphere","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002016023000310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Straw return can be used to reduce fertilizer input and improve agricultural sustainability and soil health. However, how straw return and reduced fertilizer application affect beneficial soil microbes, particularly arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), remains poorly understood. Here, we conducted a five-year field experiment in a rainfed maize field on the Loess Plateau of northwestern China. We tested four treatments with straw return combined with four nitrogen (N) application rates, i.e., 100%, 80%, 60%, and 0% of the common N application rate (225 kg N ha-1 year-1) in this region, and two reference treatments (full or no N application), with three replicates for each treatment. Mycorrhizal colonization was quantified and AMF communities colonizing maize roots were characterized using Illumina sequencing. Forty virtual taxa (VTs) of AMF were identified in root samples, among which VT113 (related to Rhizophagus fasciculatus) and VT156 (related to Dominikia gansuensis) were the predominant taxa. Both root length colonization and AMF VT richness were sensitive to N fertilization, but not to straw return; furthermore, both gradually increased with decreasing N application rate. The VT composition of the AMF community was also affected by N fertilization, but not by straw return, and the community variation could be well explained by soil available N and phosphorus concentrations. Additionally, 60%, 80%, and full N fertilization produced similar maize yields. Thus, our study revealed the response patterns of AMF to straw return and N fertilizer reduction and showed that straw return combined with N fertilizer reduction may be a promising practice to maintain mycorrhizal symbiosis concomitantly with crop productivity.

雨养玉米田丛枝菌根真菌对秸秆还田和氮肥减量的响应
秸秆还田可用于减少化肥投入,改善农业可持续性和土壤健康。然而,人们对秸秆还田和减少化肥施用量如何影响土壤有益微生物,尤其是丛枝菌根真菌(AMF),仍然知之甚少。在此,我们在中国西北黄土高原的一块雨养玉米田进行了为期五年的田间试验。我们测试了秸秆还田与四种氮(N)施用率(即该地区常见氮施用率(225 kg N ha-1 year-1)的 100%、80%、60% 和 0%)相结合的四种处理,以及两种参考处理(完全施氮或不施氮),每种处理设三个重复。利用 Illumina 测序技术对菌根定殖情况进行了量化,并对定殖在玉米根部的 AMF 群落进行了表征。在根样本中鉴定出 40 个 AMF 虚拟类群(VTs),其中 VT113(与 Rhizophagus fasciculatus 相关)和 VT156(与 Dominikia gansuensis 相关)是主要类群。根长定殖率和AMF VT丰富度对氮肥敏感,但对秸秆还田不敏感;此外,二者均随氮肥施用量的减少而逐渐增加。AMF 群落的 VT 组成也受氮肥影响,但不受秸秆还田的影响,而且群落的变化可以很好地用土壤可利用的氮和磷浓度来解释。此外,60%、80% 和全氮施肥产生的玉米产量相似。因此,我们的研究揭示了 AMF 对秸秆还田和减少氮肥的响应模式,并表明秸秆还田与减少氮肥相结合可能是一种很有前景的做法,可在保持菌根共生的同时提高作物产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedosphere
Pedosphere 环境科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
5.0 months
期刊介绍: PEDOSPHERE—a peer-reviewed international journal published bimonthly in English—welcomes submissions from scientists around the world under a broad scope of topics relevant to timely, high quality original research findings, especially up-to-date achievements and advances in the entire field of soil science studies dealing with environmental science, ecology, agriculture, bioscience, geoscience, forestry, etc. It publishes mainly original research articles as well as some reviews, mini reviews, short communications and special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信