Call for papers for a special issue—The research of inter-organizational relationships: Cross-border issues, settings, and insights

IF 0.9 Q4 BUSINESS
{"title":"Call for papers for a special issue—The research of inter-organizational relationships: Cross-border issues, settings, and insights","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/26943980.2021.1992245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A long history exists of IOR scholarship in international settings. This impressive body of work was originally focused on market entry (Rosson & Ford, 1982), export relationships and performance (Madsen 1987; Munro & Beamish, 1987) and negotiations and disputes (Gulliver, 1979). It quickly blossomed into investigations of important IOR topics including strategy (Cavusgil & Shaoming, 1994), transaction costs and relationship structure (Klein et al., 1990), control (Gatignon & Anderson, 1988), governance (Bello & Gilliland, 1997), channel integration (Aulakh & Kotabe, 1997), and motivation (Katsikeas & Kaleka, 1999). More recently, scholars in this domain have made inter-organization trust a major theme (Couper et al., 2020; Katsikeas et al., 2009; Zaheer & Zaheer, 2006), as well as diversity and culture (Stahl et al., 2010), relational norms (Obadia et al., 2017), and relationship quality (Leonidou et al., 2014; Styles et al., 2008, Zhang et al., 2003). International IORs face significant and unique challenges including psychic, geographic, and cultural distances and disruptions (Evans, 2011; Obadia, 2013; Prime et al., 2009); financial constraints and regulations; political risk (Blumentritt & Nigh, 2002); communication difficulties (Griffith, 2002) and cultural differences (Gu et al., 2008; Stahl & Tung, 2015); governance, control, and motivation (Obadia et al., 2015); and feelings of foreignness (Samaha et al., 2014; Denk et al., 2012). These, and other important topics such as methodological concerns, continue to drive the international IOR literature. Aims and scope of this issue","PeriodicalId":53183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inter-Organizational Relationships","volume":"27 1","pages":"53 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inter-Organizational Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26943980.2021.1992245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A long history exists of IOR scholarship in international settings. This impressive body of work was originally focused on market entry (Rosson & Ford, 1982), export relationships and performance (Madsen 1987; Munro & Beamish, 1987) and negotiations and disputes (Gulliver, 1979). It quickly blossomed into investigations of important IOR topics including strategy (Cavusgil & Shaoming, 1994), transaction costs and relationship structure (Klein et al., 1990), control (Gatignon & Anderson, 1988), governance (Bello & Gilliland, 1997), channel integration (Aulakh & Kotabe, 1997), and motivation (Katsikeas & Kaleka, 1999). More recently, scholars in this domain have made inter-organization trust a major theme (Couper et al., 2020; Katsikeas et al., 2009; Zaheer & Zaheer, 2006), as well as diversity and culture (Stahl et al., 2010), relational norms (Obadia et al., 2017), and relationship quality (Leonidou et al., 2014; Styles et al., 2008, Zhang et al., 2003). International IORs face significant and unique challenges including psychic, geographic, and cultural distances and disruptions (Evans, 2011; Obadia, 2013; Prime et al., 2009); financial constraints and regulations; political risk (Blumentritt & Nigh, 2002); communication difficulties (Griffith, 2002) and cultural differences (Gu et al., 2008; Stahl & Tung, 2015); governance, control, and motivation (Obadia et al., 2015); and feelings of foreignness (Samaha et al., 2014; Denk et al., 2012). These, and other important topics such as methodological concerns, continue to drive the international IOR literature. Aims and scope of this issue
组织间关系的研究:跨界问题、背景和见解
IOR奖学金在国际环境中有着悠久的历史。这些令人印象深刻的工作最初集中在市场进入(Rosson & Ford, 1982)、出口关系和绩效(Madsen 1987;门罗和比米什,1987)和谈判和争端(格列佛,1979)。它迅速发展成为对重要IOR主题的调查,包括战略(Cavusgil & shaming, 1994)、交易成本和关系结构(Klein等,1990)、控制(Gatignon & Anderson, 1988)、治理(Bello & Gilliland, 1997)、渠道整合(Aulakh & Kotabe, 1997)和动机(Katsikeas & Kaleka, 1999)。最近,该领域的学者将组织间信任作为一个主要主题(Couper et al., 2020;Katsikeas et al., 2009;Zaheer & Zaheer, 2006),以及多样性和文化(Stahl等人,2010)、关系规范(Obadia等人,2017)和关系质量(Leonidou等人,2014;Styles等人,2008;Zhang等人,2003)。国际ior面临着重大而独特的挑战,包括心理、地理和文化距离和中断(Evans, 2011;Obadia, 2013;Prime et al., 2009);财政限制和条例;政治风险(Blumentritt & Nigh, 2002);沟通困难(Griffith, 2002)和文化差异(Gu et al., 2008;Stahl & Tung, 2015);治理、控制和动机(Obadia et al., 2015);和异乡感(Samaha et al., 2014;Denk et al., 2012)。这些,以及其他重要的主题,如方法论问题,继续推动国际IOR文献。这个问题的目的和范围
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信