Association between sarcopenia and hospitalization in community-dwelling older adults, using the SARC-F and SARC-CalF methods: a systematic review protocol

IF 0.8 Q4 REHABILITATION
Aline de Bastos Ferreira, Rômulo Roosevelt da Silva Filho, L. P. Rodrigues, Guilherme Vinicius de Souza, M. Noll, É. A. Silveira
{"title":"Association between sarcopenia and hospitalization in community-dwelling older adults, using the SARC-F and SARC-CalF methods: a systematic review protocol","authors":"Aline de Bastos Ferreira, Rômulo Roosevelt da Silva Filho, L. P. Rodrigues, Guilherme Vinicius de Souza, M. Noll, É. A. Silveira","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2021.1917843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Sarcopenia is a syndrome highly prevalent in older adults, leading to negative health outcomes such as reduced functionality, increased dependence, hospitalization and mortality. It is diagnosed using high-tech methods that are unavailable to the general population. Thus, it is useful to use low-cost and easily applicable sarcopenia screening methods such as SARC-F or SARC-CalF. However, it is unknown whether sarcopenia, as identified by these methods, is associated with a higher risk of hospitalization in the older adults population. Thus, this systematic review protocol aims to determine whether there is an association between sarcopenia, as diagnosed by the SARC-F and SARC-CalF methods, and hospitalization in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This study follows the criteria proposed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. We will include studies with an observational design, conducted with community-dwelling older adults (≥ 60 years), that used SARC-F/SARC-CalF as screening tool for sarcopenia, and that presented hospitalization indicators. The following databases will be used: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Lilacs. Studies will be selected based on title, abstract, and full text. The quality of the included studies will be assessed using “Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation” tool. The risk of bias will be assessed using Downs and Black tool. Results: The results of this research may deepen our knowledge of these two methods and their use for identifying and monitoring sarcopenia. Conclusions: Our research will especially benefit if these tools can discriminate the potential risk of hospitalization in older adults and so contribute to reducing early mortality.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":"26 1","pages":"391 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10833196.2021.1917843","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2021.1917843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Background: Sarcopenia is a syndrome highly prevalent in older adults, leading to negative health outcomes such as reduced functionality, increased dependence, hospitalization and mortality. It is diagnosed using high-tech methods that are unavailable to the general population. Thus, it is useful to use low-cost and easily applicable sarcopenia screening methods such as SARC-F or SARC-CalF. However, it is unknown whether sarcopenia, as identified by these methods, is associated with a higher risk of hospitalization in the older adults population. Thus, this systematic review protocol aims to determine whether there is an association between sarcopenia, as diagnosed by the SARC-F and SARC-CalF methods, and hospitalization in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This study follows the criteria proposed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. We will include studies with an observational design, conducted with community-dwelling older adults (≥ 60 years), that used SARC-F/SARC-CalF as screening tool for sarcopenia, and that presented hospitalization indicators. The following databases will be used: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Lilacs. Studies will be selected based on title, abstract, and full text. The quality of the included studies will be assessed using “Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation” tool. The risk of bias will be assessed using Downs and Black tool. Results: The results of this research may deepen our knowledge of these two methods and their use for identifying and monitoring sarcopenia. Conclusions: Our research will especially benefit if these tools can discriminate the potential risk of hospitalization in older adults and so contribute to reducing early mortality.
使用SARC-F和SARC-CalF方法的社区居住老年人肌肉减少症与住院之间的关系:一项系统评价方案
背景:骨骼肌减少症是老年人中非常普遍的一种综合征,可导致功能下降、依赖性增加、住院和死亡率等负面健康结果。它是用一般人群无法使用的高科技方法诊断的。因此,使用低成本和易于应用的肌少症筛查方法如SARC-F或SARC-CalF是有用的。然而,尚不清楚通过这些方法确定的肌肉减少症是否与老年人群中较高的住院风险相关。因此,本系统评价方案旨在确定SARC-F和SARC-CalF方法诊断的肌肉减少症与社区居住老年人住院之间是否存在关联。方法:本研究遵循系统评价首选报告项目和荟萃分析方案提出的标准。我们将纳入采用观察性设计的研究,研究对象为社区居住的老年人(≥60岁),使用SARC-F/SARC-CalF作为肌肉减少症筛查工具,并提供住院指标。将使用以下数据库:PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE和Lilacs。研究将根据标题、摘要和全文进行选择。纳入研究的质量将使用“推荐、评估、发展和评估分级”工具进行评估。偏差风险将使用Downs和Black工具进行评估。结果:本研究的结果可能加深我们对这两种方法的认识,以及它们在识别和监测肌肉减少症中的应用。结论:如果这些工具能够区分老年人住院的潜在风险,从而有助于降低早期死亡率,我们的研究将特别有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy Reviews
Physical Therapy Reviews REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy Reviews is an international journal which aims to publish contemporary reviews, discussion papers and editorials within physical therapy, and in those basic and clinical sciences which are the basis of physical therapy. The journal is aimed at all those involved in research, teaching and practice within the area of physical therapy. Reviews (both descriptive and systematic) are invited in the following areas, which reflect the breadth and diversity of practice within physical therapy: •neurological rehabilitation •movement and exercise •orthopaedics and rheumatology •manual therapy and massage •sports medicine •measurement •chest physiotherapy •electrotherapeutics •obstetrics and gynaecology •complementary therapies •professional issues •musculoskeletal rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信