“The Main Parts Are Made in Europe”: Apologetic/Critical Dichotomy and the Untold Story of Qur’anic Studies in the Iranian Academy

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Pub Date : 2020-12-17 DOI:10.1163/15700682-12341510

Mohsen Feyzbakhsh

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This response to Majid Daneshgar’s book develops his argument about apologetics in the study of the Qur’an in the Muslim Academy in two ways. First, it makes a distinction between two different senses of the term apologetics and then shows how each sense would be relevant to Daneshgar’s argument. Second, it applies the argument to Islamic studies in the Iranian Academy in particular.

查看原文本刊更多论文

“主要部分是欧洲制造的”：道歉/批判的二分法与伊朗学院古兰经研究的不为人知的故事

对Majid Daneshgar的书的回应从两个方面展开了他关于护教学在穆斯林学院研究《古兰经》中的观点。首先，它区分了护教学一词的两种不同含义，然后展示了每种含义如何与达内什加尔的论点相关。其次，它将这一论点特别应用于伊朗学院的伊斯兰研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Method & Theory in the Study of Religion publishes articles, notes, book reviews and letters which explicitly address the problems of methodology and theory in the academic study of religion. This includes such traditional points of departure as history, philosophy, anthropology and sociology, but also the natural sciences, and such newer disciplinary approaches as feminist theory and studies. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion also concentrates on the critical analysis of theoretical problems prominent in the study of religion.