Original Power Pointing: Legibility and Opacity in the Deictic Field

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
T. Widlok
{"title":"Original Power Pointing: Legibility and Opacity in the Deictic Field","authors":"T. Widlok","doi":"10.1080/00141844.2021.1981971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Governance by domination is easy to ‘read’ for political theory, but what about modes of governance that operate without centralised institutions? Such modes of governance are exemplified in the social relations of San in southern Africa. They rely on deictic practices (most fundamentally, pointing and being pointed at) that remain largely under the analytic radar of political theory. This contribution shows how such practices structure social interactions yet can also undermine domination. While state legibility is built on symbolic action, opacity in non-centralised environments is sustained through deictic action: The contribution shows that San strategies are not geared towards eliminating opacity or towards embracing it but rather towards dealing with it in a way that keeps egalitarian relations and personal autonomy in place. The observed practices are characterised by high degrees of mutuality and transience and are part of the larger repertoire of political levelling mechanisms that sustain egalitarianism.","PeriodicalId":47259,"journal":{"name":"Ethnos","volume":"88 1","pages":"819 - 836"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2021.1981971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Governance by domination is easy to ‘read’ for political theory, but what about modes of governance that operate without centralised institutions? Such modes of governance are exemplified in the social relations of San in southern Africa. They rely on deictic practices (most fundamentally, pointing and being pointed at) that remain largely under the analytic radar of political theory. This contribution shows how such practices structure social interactions yet can also undermine domination. While state legibility is built on symbolic action, opacity in non-centralised environments is sustained through deictic action: The contribution shows that San strategies are not geared towards eliminating opacity or towards embracing it but rather towards dealing with it in a way that keeps egalitarian relations and personal autonomy in place. The observed practices are characterised by high degrees of mutuality and transience and are part of the larger repertoire of political levelling mechanisms that sustain egalitarianism.
原始力量指向:指示场中的可读性和不透明性
摘要统治治理对于政治理论来说很容易“解读”,但没有中央集权机构的治理模式呢?这种治理模式体现在南部非洲桑的社会关系中。他们依赖于指示实践(最根本的是,指向和被指向),这些实践在很大程度上仍处于政治理论的分析雷达之下。这一贡献表明,这种做法是如何构建社会互动的,但也可能破坏统治。虽然国家的易读性建立在象征性行动之上,但非集中环境中的不透明性是通过指示性行动来维持的:这一贡献表明,San的战略并不是为了消除不透明性或拥抱不透明性,而是为了以保持平等关系和个人自主权的方式来处理不透明性。观察到的做法具有高度的相互性和短暂性,是维持平等主义的更大的政治平衡机制的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnos
Ethnos ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Ethnos is a peer-reviewed journal, which publishes original papers promoting theoretical, methodological and empirical developments in the discipline of socio-cultural anthropology. ethnos provides a forum where a wide variety of different anthropologies can gather together and enter into critical exchange.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书