Creation and validation of a linear index to measure the health state of patients with depression in automated healthcare databases.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2019-10-09 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20016689.2019.1674115
Maëlys Touya, François-Xavier Lamy, Adrian Tanasescu, Delphine Saragoussi, Clément François, Alan G Wade, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Christophe Lançon, Bruno Falissard
{"title":"Creation and validation of a linear index to measure the health state of patients with depression in automated healthcare databases.","authors":"Maëlys Touya, François-Xavier Lamy, Adrian Tanasescu, Delphine Saragoussi, Clément François, Alan G Wade, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Christophe Lançon, Bruno Falissard","doi":"10.1080/20016689.2019.1674115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and objective</b>: We previously built a weighted Depressive Health State Index (DHSI) based on 29 parameters routinely collected in an automated healthcare database (AHDB). We now propose a linear DHSI (L-DHSI) which is easier to use and to replicate across AHDBs. <b>Methods</b>: A historical cohort of patients with ≥1 episode of depression was identified in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The DHSI was calculated for each treated episode of depression. Validation was performed by using validated definitions of remission (proxy and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 or PHQ-9) and comparing the L-DHSI between subgroups. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. <b>Results</b>: Between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2012, 309,279 episodes of depression were identified in the CPRD. Remission was observed in 5% of the patients with lowest L-DHSI scores and in 78% of the patients with highest L-DHSI scores. Although less sensitive than the weighted DHSI, the L-DHSI was reliable and relatively easy of use. The L-DHSI was highly correlated to the weighted DHSI (Spearman coefficient 0.790, p < 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b>: The L-DHSI represents a good balance between reliability, usability, and reproducibility. In addition, the linearity of this index allows for an easier interpretation than the original weighted DHSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6792044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2019.1674115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: We previously built a weighted Depressive Health State Index (DHSI) based on 29 parameters routinely collected in an automated healthcare database (AHDB). We now propose a linear DHSI (L-DHSI) which is easier to use and to replicate across AHDBs. Methods: A historical cohort of patients with ≥1 episode of depression was identified in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The DHSI was calculated for each treated episode of depression. Validation was performed by using validated definitions of remission (proxy and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 or PHQ-9) and comparing the L-DHSI between subgroups. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Results: Between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2012, 309,279 episodes of depression were identified in the CPRD. Remission was observed in 5% of the patients with lowest L-DHSI scores and in 78% of the patients with highest L-DHSI scores. Although less sensitive than the weighted DHSI, the L-DHSI was reliable and relatively easy of use. The L-DHSI was highly correlated to the weighted DHSI (Spearman coefficient 0.790, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The L-DHSI represents a good balance between reliability, usability, and reproducibility. In addition, the linearity of this index allows for an easier interpretation than the original weighted DHSI.

在自动化医疗数据库中创建和验证用于测量抑郁症患者健康状态的线性指数
摘要背景和目的:我们之前基于自动医疗数据库(AHDB)中常规收集的29个参数建立了一个加权抑郁健康状态指数(DHSI)。我们现在提出了一种更容易使用和在AHDB中复制的线性DHSI(L-DHSI)。方法:在临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)中确定一个抑郁症发作≥1次的历史队列。对每一次治疗的抑郁症发作计算DHSI。通过使用已验证的缓解定义(代理和患者健康问卷9或PHQ-9)并比较各亚组之间的L-DHSI进行验证。使用Cronbachα评估可靠性。结果:在2006年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间,CPRD中发现309279例抑郁症发作。L-DHSI评分最低的患者中有5%出现缓解,L-DHSI得分最高的患者中78%出现缓解。尽管L-DHSI不如加权DHSI敏感,但它可靠且相对易于使用。L-DHSI与加权DHSI高度相关(Spearman系数0.790,p<0.001)。结论:L-DHSI在可靠性、可用性和再现性之间表现出良好的平衡。此外,该指数的线性比原始加权DHSI更容易解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信