Patient centricity: Alienating patients from their own decisions is subjugation

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
Michael Gill
{"title":"Patient centricity: Alienating patients from their own decisions is subjugation","authors":"Michael Gill","doi":"10.1177/2053434520978328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to scope patient centricity as being more than patient-clinician interactions and to raise a number of challenges. Patient centricity 1 is about listening to and working with patients from the ill-informed to the well informed. The concept does not attempt to isolate or overturn clinical expertise but rather, add a useful dimension which promotes trust and self-care. There are many examples of patients and clinicians working together, making shared decisions and promoting self-care to varying degrees. These examples, however, are isolated like spring desert flowers with many disappearing. Patient centricity requires the sharing of patient data and the right to correct errors. This requires an approach where the clinician gives up some authority in favour of increased equity and trust. Patient centricity, patient centred approaches and patient pathways are all about involving the patient in decisions, collaborating with the patient as a partner and about addressing the inequality of power between clinician and patient. Where there is a lack of patient centricity unfortunate events can occur across the industry. Clinicians, patients and the health industry are working together better and there are a number of notable success. In many ways patient centricity has only just started to emerge as a permanent feature.","PeriodicalId":43751,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Coordination","volume":"23 1","pages":"133 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2053434520978328","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2053434520978328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper aims to scope patient centricity as being more than patient-clinician interactions and to raise a number of challenges. Patient centricity 1 is about listening to and working with patients from the ill-informed to the well informed. The concept does not attempt to isolate or overturn clinical expertise but rather, add a useful dimension which promotes trust and self-care. There are many examples of patients and clinicians working together, making shared decisions and promoting self-care to varying degrees. These examples, however, are isolated like spring desert flowers with many disappearing. Patient centricity requires the sharing of patient data and the right to correct errors. This requires an approach where the clinician gives up some authority in favour of increased equity and trust. Patient centricity, patient centred approaches and patient pathways are all about involving the patient in decisions, collaborating with the patient as a partner and about addressing the inequality of power between clinician and patient. Where there is a lack of patient centricity unfortunate events can occur across the industry. Clinicians, patients and the health industry are working together better and there are a number of notable success. In many ways patient centricity has only just started to emerge as a permanent feature.
以患者为中心:让患者脱离自己的决定就是征服
本文旨在将以患者为中心的范围界定为不仅仅是患者-临床医生的相互作用,并提出了一些挑战。以病人为中心就是倾听病人的心声,并与他们一起工作,从消息不灵通的病人到消息灵通的病人。这个概念并不试图孤立或推翻临床专业知识,而是增加一个有用的维度,促进信任和自我保健。有很多例子表明,患者和临床医生一起工作,共同做出决定,并在不同程度上促进自我保健。然而,这些例子是孤立的,就像春天的沙漠之花,许多都消失了。以患者为中心要求共享患者数据和纠正错误的权利。这需要临床医生放弃一些权威,以增加公平和信任。以患者为中心,以患者为中心的方法和途径都是关于让患者参与决策,作为合作伙伴与患者合作以及解决临床医生和患者之间权力不平等的问题。在缺乏以病人为中心的情况下,整个行业都可能发生不幸事件。临床医生、患者和卫生行业正在更好地合作,并取得了一些显著的成功。在许多方面,以病人为中心才刚刚开始成为一个永久的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Care Coordination (formerly published as the International Journal of Care Pathways) provides an international forum for the latest scientific research in care coordination. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles which describe basic research to a multidisciplinary field as well as other broader approaches and strategies hypothesized to improve care coordination. The Journal offers insightful overviews and reflections on innovation, underlying issues, and thought provoking opinion pieces in related fields. Articles from multidisciplinary fields are welcomed from leading health care academics and policy-makers. Published articles types include original research, reviews, guidelines papers, book reviews, and news items.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信