Biomarkers to aid the return to play decision following sports-related concussion: a systematic review

N. Senaratne, Alexandra Hunt, Eleanor Sotsman, M. Grey
{"title":"Biomarkers to aid the return to play decision following sports-related concussion: a systematic review","authors":"N. Senaratne, Alexandra Hunt, Eleanor Sotsman, M. Grey","doi":"10.1177/20597002211070735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Premature return to play (RTP) following sports-related concussion (SRC) is associated with significant morbidity including risk of neurological and non-neurological injury, persistent post-concussion symptoms and chronic neurological deficits. Assessing athletes for RTP is critical but these decisions are currently based on clinical assessments that are subject to bias and symptomatic reporting that rely on compliance. An objective and easily obtained biomarker that can indicate recovery following SRC would aid clinicians to make safer RTP decisions. We performed a systematic review to identify potential biomarkers from saliva, urine and blood sources that could inform the clinical RTP decision. The MEDLINE database was searched. Inclusion criteria were studies focusing on adults diagnosed with SRC, fluid biomarkers from blood, saliva or urine and clinical recovery from SRC or at RTP. We assessed each biomarker for their time course post SRC and relationship to clinical recovery. Secondary outcomes included correlation with symptom scores and predictive value for prolonged RTP. We identified 8 studies all investigating blood-based markers of diffuse axonal injury (tau, NFL, SNTF), neuroglial injury (NSE, VLP-1, UCH-L1, S100B, GFAP), inflammation and hormonal disturbances. Tau, SNTF, UCH-1, GFAP, S100B and the inflammatory cytokine MCP-4 are raised post SRC and return to baseline by RTP. Changes in tau, NFL, SNTF, GFAP and MCP-4 post SRC correlate with severity of concussion as measured by symptom severity or RTP duration. There is only preliminary case-reporting for hormonal biomarkers. The evidence is limited by a lack of highly powered studies, variation in use of athletic and Contact sport controls (CSC) and a lack of consistent sampling and assessment protocols. There is promise for biomarkers to aid RTP decisions following SRC, most notably in use alongside clinical assessment in RTP criteria to allow greater precision in identifying mild and severe concussion.","PeriodicalId":92541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of concussion","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597002211070735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Premature return to play (RTP) following sports-related concussion (SRC) is associated with significant morbidity including risk of neurological and non-neurological injury, persistent post-concussion symptoms and chronic neurological deficits. Assessing athletes for RTP is critical but these decisions are currently based on clinical assessments that are subject to bias and symptomatic reporting that rely on compliance. An objective and easily obtained biomarker that can indicate recovery following SRC would aid clinicians to make safer RTP decisions. We performed a systematic review to identify potential biomarkers from saliva, urine and blood sources that could inform the clinical RTP decision. The MEDLINE database was searched. Inclusion criteria were studies focusing on adults diagnosed with SRC, fluid biomarkers from blood, saliva or urine and clinical recovery from SRC or at RTP. We assessed each biomarker for their time course post SRC and relationship to clinical recovery. Secondary outcomes included correlation with symptom scores and predictive value for prolonged RTP. We identified 8 studies all investigating blood-based markers of diffuse axonal injury (tau, NFL, SNTF), neuroglial injury (NSE, VLP-1, UCH-L1, S100B, GFAP), inflammation and hormonal disturbances. Tau, SNTF, UCH-1, GFAP, S100B and the inflammatory cytokine MCP-4 are raised post SRC and return to baseline by RTP. Changes in tau, NFL, SNTF, GFAP and MCP-4 post SRC correlate with severity of concussion as measured by symptom severity or RTP duration. There is only preliminary case-reporting for hormonal biomarkers. The evidence is limited by a lack of highly powered studies, variation in use of athletic and Contact sport controls (CSC) and a lack of consistent sampling and assessment protocols. There is promise for biomarkers to aid RTP decisions following SRC, most notably in use alongside clinical assessment in RTP criteria to allow greater precision in identifying mild and severe concussion.
有助于运动相关脑震荡后重返赛场决策的生物标志物:一项系统综述
运动相关脑震荡(SRC)后过早重返赛场(RTP)与显著的发病率相关,包括神经和非神经损伤的风险、持续的脑震荡后症状和慢性神经功能缺陷。评估运动员的RTP是至关重要的,但这些决定目前是基于临床评估,这些评估存在偏见,症状报告依赖于依从性。一种客观且易于获得的生物标志物可以指示SRC后的恢复,这将有助于临床医生做出更安全的RTP决策。我们进行了一项系统综述,以确定唾液、尿液和血液来源的潜在生物标志物,这些生物标志物可以为临床RTP决策提供信息。搜索MEDLINE数据库。纳入标准是针对诊断为SRC的成年人、血液、唾液或尿液中的液体生物标志物以及SRC或RTP的临床康复的研究。我们评估了每种生物标志物在SRC后的时间过程以及与临床恢复的关系。次要结果包括与症状评分的相关性以及RTP延长的预测价值。我们确定了8项研究,均研究了弥漫性轴索损伤(tau、NFL、SNTF)、神经胶质细胞损伤(NSE、VLP-1、UCH-L1、S100B、GFAP)、炎症和激素紊乱的血液标志物。Tau、SNTF、UCH-1、GFAP、S100B和炎性细胞因子MCP-4在SRC后升高,并通过RTP恢复到基线。SRC后tau、NFL、SNTF、GFAP和MCP-4的变化与脑震荡的严重程度相关,通过症状严重程度或RTP持续时间来衡量。只有激素生物标志物的初步病例报告。由于缺乏强有力的研究、运动和接触运动控制(CSC)的使用变化以及缺乏一致的采样和评估协议,证据受到限制。生物标志物有望帮助SRC后的RTP决策,最显著的是与RTP标准的临床评估一起使用,以提高识别轻度和重度脑震荡的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信