Comparision of Various Vasodilators Regimen During Radial Corornary Angiogram: A Prospective Randomised Trial

R. Malla, B. Kc, C. Adhikari, B. Rauniyar, Deepak Limbu, B. Baniya, S. Dhungel, Khagendra Jung Shah, S. Khadka, Sabita Aryal, Pratikshya Joshi, A. Bhattarai
{"title":"Comparision of Various Vasodilators Regimen During Radial Corornary Angiogram: A Prospective Randomised Trial","authors":"R. Malla, B. Kc, C. Adhikari, B. Rauniyar, Deepak Limbu, B. Baniya, S. Dhungel, Khagendra Jung Shah, S. Khadka, Sabita Aryal, Pratikshya Joshi, A. Bhattarai","doi":"10.3126/JAIM.V5I1.17065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Coronary intervention through radial artery is a preferred over femoral route. Different vasodilators are used to prevent radial artery spasm. Till date there is no study to compare the effects of various vasodilator regimes during radial coronary angiogram in Nepal. We aim to compare the efficacy of different vasodilator in our patients. Methods and Result: This is a single centre, prospective randomized trial between Verapamil, Nitroglycerine (GTN) and cocktail (Verapamil with GTN). All the patient undergoing coronary angiogram via radial approach, without the contraindication were randomized by a computer generated randomization protocol. Patient undergoing coronary procedures via the radial artery were divided into three groups. Patients in group A received intra-arterial cocktail (2.5 mg of Verapamil plus 100 mcg Nitroglycerine in 10 ml of normal saline), patients in group B received Verapamil (5mg) and patient in group C received Nitroglycerine (200mcg). Heparin of 3000U was given intravenously in all three groips. Altogether 207 patients underwent transradial coronary angiogram, 203 were randomized after exclusion. Over all Radial artery spasm was reported in 28 patients (13.79%). There was no statistically significant difference in spasm between the three regimens however when grading, there was significant higher grade of spasm in Verapamil group (13.23%, P value < 0.05). When comparing Verapamil and GTN separately there was significant higher spasm (21% vs 7%, P value < 0.05) with higher grades of spasm in verapamil group. Journal of Advances in Internal Medicine 2016;05(01):11-14","PeriodicalId":75443,"journal":{"name":"Advances in internal medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"11-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/JAIM.V5I1.17065","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in internal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/JAIM.V5I1.17065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and Aims: Coronary intervention through radial artery is a preferred over femoral route. Different vasodilators are used to prevent radial artery spasm. Till date there is no study to compare the effects of various vasodilator regimes during radial coronary angiogram in Nepal. We aim to compare the efficacy of different vasodilator in our patients. Methods and Result: This is a single centre, prospective randomized trial between Verapamil, Nitroglycerine (GTN) and cocktail (Verapamil with GTN). All the patient undergoing coronary angiogram via radial approach, without the contraindication were randomized by a computer generated randomization protocol. Patient undergoing coronary procedures via the radial artery were divided into three groups. Patients in group A received intra-arterial cocktail (2.5 mg of Verapamil plus 100 mcg Nitroglycerine in 10 ml of normal saline), patients in group B received Verapamil (5mg) and patient in group C received Nitroglycerine (200mcg). Heparin of 3000U was given intravenously in all three groips. Altogether 207 patients underwent transradial coronary angiogram, 203 were randomized after exclusion. Over all Radial artery spasm was reported in 28 patients (13.79%). There was no statistically significant difference in spasm between the three regimens however when grading, there was significant higher grade of spasm in Verapamil group (13.23%, P value < 0.05). When comparing Verapamil and GTN separately there was significant higher spasm (21% vs 7%, P value < 0.05) with higher grades of spasm in verapamil group. Journal of Advances in Internal Medicine 2016;05(01):11-14
桡动脉冠状动脉造影期间不同血管扩张剂治疗方案的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
背景与目的:桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗优于股动脉介入治疗。不同的血管扩张剂用于预防桡动脉痉挛。到目前为止,还没有研究比较在尼泊尔桡动脉冠状动脉造影期间各种血管扩张剂的效果。我们的目的是比较不同的血管扩张剂在我们患者中的疗效。方法和结果:这是一项在维拉帕米、硝化甘油(GTN)和混合物(维拉帕米与GTN)之间进行的单中心、前瞻性随机试验。所有无禁忌症的经桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影的患者通过计算机生成的随机化方案进行随机化。经桡动脉行冠状动脉手术的患者分为三组。A组患者接受动脉内鸡尾酒治疗(维拉帕米2.5 mg +硝酸甘油100 mcg,加入生理盐水10 ml中),B组患者接受维拉帕米5mg, C组患者接受硝酸甘油200mcg。三组均静脉滴注肝素3000U。共有207例患者行经桡动脉冠状动脉造影,203例经排除后随机分组。总的来说,桡动脉痉挛28例(13.79%)。三组患者痉挛程度比较差异无统计学意义,但分级时维拉帕米组痉挛程度明显高于对照组(13.23%,P值< 0.05)。维拉帕米组与GTN组分别比较,痉挛发生率明显高于对照组(21% vs 7%, P值< 0.05),痉挛程度较高。内科学进展;2016;05(01):11-14
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书