Evaluation of graft uptake in underlay myringoplasty using dry and wet temporalis fascia graft

Md Hasanul Haque, A. Huq, Nigar Sultana, Tanvir Ahmed, Abirvab Naha, Md. Abdur Razzak, Mohammad Jahidur Rahman Khan, Md Jaber Al Sayied
{"title":"Evaluation of graft uptake in underlay myringoplasty using dry and wet temporalis fascia graft","authors":"Md Hasanul Haque, A. Huq, Nigar Sultana, Tanvir Ahmed, Abirvab Naha, Md. Abdur Razzak, Mohammad Jahidur Rahman Khan, Md Jaber Al Sayied","doi":"10.3329/bsmmuj.v15i2.60860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic otitis media (COM) is a vital cause of deafness worldwide. Myringoplasty is one of the best treatment options for COM (inactive mucosal variety). Temporalis Fascia is the most favored grafting material among various autografts, which can be used as dry or wet depending upon the Surgeon's choice. The main focus of this study is to compare the graft uptake rate by using dry and wet temporalis fascia by underlay technique. This cross-sectional comparative study was directed from January 2018 to June 2019 at the Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery of BSMMU, Dhaka. All consecutive cases of COM (inactive mucosal) who underwent surgery were randomly assigned either into the dry (Group-A) or wet temporalis fascia group (Group-B). At 12 weeks follow-up, the density of graft failure (4.4% vs. 8.8%) and retraction pocket (0% vs. 2.2%) were higher in the wet procedure. However anterior blunting (2.2% vs. 2.2%) were the same in both procedures, and medialization (2.2% vs. 0%) were more in the dry procedure. Air Bone Gap (ABG) improved significantly in both groups following operation but reduced in Group-A more significantly than Group-B. On the other hand, there was no remarkable difference in successful graft uptake between the groups (Dry group-91.12% vs. wet group-84.44%, p>0.05). No graft material is superior to others in terms of graft uptake.\nBSMMU J 2022; 15(2): 84-89","PeriodicalId":8681,"journal":{"name":"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v15i2.60860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic otitis media (COM) is a vital cause of deafness worldwide. Myringoplasty is one of the best treatment options for COM (inactive mucosal variety). Temporalis Fascia is the most favored grafting material among various autografts, which can be used as dry or wet depending upon the Surgeon's choice. The main focus of this study is to compare the graft uptake rate by using dry and wet temporalis fascia by underlay technique. This cross-sectional comparative study was directed from January 2018 to June 2019 at the Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery of BSMMU, Dhaka. All consecutive cases of COM (inactive mucosal) who underwent surgery were randomly assigned either into the dry (Group-A) or wet temporalis fascia group (Group-B). At 12 weeks follow-up, the density of graft failure (4.4% vs. 8.8%) and retraction pocket (0% vs. 2.2%) were higher in the wet procedure. However anterior blunting (2.2% vs. 2.2%) were the same in both procedures, and medialization (2.2% vs. 0%) were more in the dry procedure. Air Bone Gap (ABG) improved significantly in both groups following operation but reduced in Group-A more significantly than Group-B. On the other hand, there was no remarkable difference in successful graft uptake between the groups (Dry group-91.12% vs. wet group-84.44%, p>0.05). No graft material is superior to others in terms of graft uptake. BSMMU J 2022; 15(2): 84-89
干、湿颞筋膜下膜成形术中移植物摄取的评价
慢性中耳炎(COM)是世界范围内耳聋的一个重要原因。鼓膜成形术是COM(无活性粘膜病变)的最佳治疗选择之一。颞筋膜是各种自体移植物中最受欢迎的移植材料,根据外科医生的选择,它可以干式或湿式使用。本研究的主要重点是比较干法和湿法颞筋膜移植术的移植物吸收率。这项横断面比较研究于2018年1月至2019年6月在达卡BSMMU耳鼻喉头颈外科进行。所有连续接受手术的COM(失活粘膜)病例随机分为干性(a组)或湿性颞筋膜组(b组)。在12周的随访中,湿法移植失败的密度(4.4%对8.8%)和回缩袋(0%对2.2%)更高。然而,前路钝化(2.2% vs. 2.2%)在两种手术中是相同的,中间化(2.2% vs. 0%)在干式手术中更多。两组术后空气骨间隙(ABG)均有明显改善,但a组明显低于b组。另一方面,两组间嫁接成功率无显著差异(干组91.12%,湿组84.44%,p < 0.05)。在移植物吸收方面,没有一种移植物材料优于其他材料。Bsmmu j 2022;15 (2): 84 - 89
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信