How to be a reflexive researcher

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
C. Sharp
{"title":"How to be a reflexive researcher","authors":"C. Sharp","doi":"10.1080/14767333.2022.2130730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this book is to enable qualitative and interpretive researchers to adopt reflexive practices, to make conscious choices that reflect an understanding of the academic debates that underpin the position they may take, and to consider the issues and implications that follow from those choices. Rooted in academic conversations about reflexivity, it suggests that researchers are often interested in reflexivity for one of twomain reasons; perhaps to compensate for ‘skew’ or bias in our perspectives that ‘causes us to see things in a certain individual way that may be atypical’ (2) or perhaps through a concern to speak authentically from our own experience and generate resonance amongst others. The author emphasises that reflexivity is very much a personal project whilst the literature reviewed is largely concerned with how reflexivity is used in the service of research, as a way of providing an account of how insights have been developed. How researchers will understand and apply reflexivity will depend on their ontological and epistemological commitments, the aims of their study and the claims they wish to make. The book opens with a compelling story that made me enthusiastic about what might be in store. Very quickly I began to see that the value of this book would lie in the questions that it prompted me to ask of myself and the work in which I am engaged.","PeriodicalId":44898,"journal":{"name":"Action Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2022.2130730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main purpose of this book is to enable qualitative and interpretive researchers to adopt reflexive practices, to make conscious choices that reflect an understanding of the academic debates that underpin the position they may take, and to consider the issues and implications that follow from those choices. Rooted in academic conversations about reflexivity, it suggests that researchers are often interested in reflexivity for one of twomain reasons; perhaps to compensate for ‘skew’ or bias in our perspectives that ‘causes us to see things in a certain individual way that may be atypical’ (2) or perhaps through a concern to speak authentically from our own experience and generate resonance amongst others. The author emphasises that reflexivity is very much a personal project whilst the literature reviewed is largely concerned with how reflexivity is used in the service of research, as a way of providing an account of how insights have been developed. How researchers will understand and apply reflexivity will depend on their ontological and epistemological commitments, the aims of their study and the claims they wish to make. The book opens with a compelling story that made me enthusiastic about what might be in store. Very quickly I began to see that the value of this book would lie in the questions that it prompted me to ask of myself and the work in which I am engaged.
如何成为一名反身性研究者
本书的主要目的是使定性和解释性研究人员能够采用反射性实践,做出有意识的选择,反映对支撑他们可能采取的立场的学术辩论的理解,并考虑这些选择所带来的问题和影响。植根于关于自反性的学术对话,这表明研究人员对自反性感兴趣的主要原因有两个;也许是为了弥补我们视角中的“扭曲”或偏见,这种“扭曲”和偏见导致我们以某种可能非典型的个人方式看待事物”(2),或者也许是为了从我们自己的经历中真实地说话,并在他人之间产生共鸣。作者强调,自反性在很大程度上是一个个人项目,而所综述的文献主要关注的是自反性如何用于研究服务,作为一种描述见解如何发展的方式。研究人员如何理解和应用自反性将取决于他们的本体论和认识论承诺、研究目的以及他们希望提出的主张。这本书以一个引人入胜的故事开场,让我对未来充满热情。很快,我开始意识到这本书的价值在于它促使我对自己和我所从事的工作提出的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Action Learning
Action Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
40.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信