Critical appraisal of the role of applying uterine fundal pressure in labour: First, do no harm

IF 0.4 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
K. Papadakis
{"title":"Critical appraisal of the role of applying uterine fundal pressure in labour: First, do no harm","authors":"K. Papadakis","doi":"10.14390/JSSHP.HRP2019-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Fundal pressure during labour is a frequently used manoeuvre for expediting delivery in cases of fetal distress, dystocia and maternal exhaustion. It is often underreported and therefore challenging to accurately estimate its prevalence. It remains a highly controversial topic, having been abandoned in many countries due to its potentially harmful consequences. Still, some health care professionals consider it safe and effective in life-threatening obstetric emergencies. Our objective was to evaluate the evidence behind the merits and drawbacks of its implementation into clinical practice. Methods: This is a critical review based on utilising high-quality references on whether it is justifiable to insist on using fundal pressure in contemporary obstetrics. Results: Fundal pressure is understudied with significant variations worldwide. Reports documenting of any substantial benefit are sparse in the literature. Nevertheless, there is a clear association with various adverse outcomes. An increasing number of experts suggest that fundal pressure should be relinquished. Conclusions: Unless future randomised controlled trials change our views on traditional methods for shortening labour when needed, practitioners should be extra vigilant in avoiding dubious techniques, as deviation from national guidelines could jeopardise aspirations for optimal intrapartum care. In the time being, fundal pressure should be limited for research purposes only within well-designed studies.","PeriodicalId":42505,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14390/JSSHP.HRP2019-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Fundal pressure during labour is a frequently used manoeuvre for expediting delivery in cases of fetal distress, dystocia and maternal exhaustion. It is often underreported and therefore challenging to accurately estimate its prevalence. It remains a highly controversial topic, having been abandoned in many countries due to its potentially harmful consequences. Still, some health care professionals consider it safe and effective in life-threatening obstetric emergencies. Our objective was to evaluate the evidence behind the merits and drawbacks of its implementation into clinical practice. Methods: This is a critical review based on utilising high-quality references on whether it is justifiable to insist on using fundal pressure in contemporary obstetrics. Results: Fundal pressure is understudied with significant variations worldwide. Reports documenting of any substantial benefit are sparse in the literature. Nevertheless, there is a clear association with various adverse outcomes. An increasing number of experts suggest that fundal pressure should be relinquished. Conclusions: Unless future randomised controlled trials change our views on traditional methods for shortening labour when needed, practitioners should be extra vigilant in avoiding dubious techniques, as deviation from national guidelines could jeopardise aspirations for optimal intrapartum care. In the time being, fundal pressure should be limited for research purposes only within well-designed studies.
对分娩中应用宫底压力作用的批判性评价:首先,不要造成伤害
目的:在胎儿窘迫、难产和产妇疲惫的情况下,分娩期间的眼底压是一种常用的加速分娩的方法。它经常被低估,因此准确估计其流行率具有挑战性。它仍然是一个极具争议的话题,由于其潜在的有害后果,许多国家都放弃了它。尽管如此,一些卫生保健专业人员认为它在危及生命的产科紧急情况下是安全有效的。我们的目的是评估其在临床实践中的优点和缺点背后的证据。方法:这是一篇基于高质量参考文献的批判性综述,这些参考文献表明在当代产科中坚持使用基金压力是否合理。结果:足底压力研究不足,世界范围内存在显著差异。文献中很少有关于任何实质性益处的报告。然而,这与各种不良后果有着明显的联系。越来越多的专家建议应该放弃资金压力。结论:除非未来的随机对照试验在需要时改变我们对缩短分娩时间的传统方法的看法,否则从业者应该格外警惕,避免使用可疑的技术,因为偏离国家指导方针可能会危及对最佳产时护理的渴望。目前,资金压力应仅限于精心设计的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hypertension Research in Pregnancy
Hypertension Research in Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信