Moving from risk to resilience in psychosis research

IF 16.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Katharine N. Thakkar, Amanda McCleery, Kyle S. Minor, Junghee Lee, Clara S. Humpston, William J. Chopik, S. Alexandra Burt, Amber L. Pearson, Michael Ungar, Sohee Park
{"title":"Moving from risk to resilience in psychosis research","authors":"Katharine N. Thakkar, Amanda McCleery, Kyle S. Minor, Junghee Lee, Clara S. Humpston, William J. Chopik, S. Alexandra Burt, Amber L. Pearson, Michael Ungar, Sohee Park","doi":"10.1038/s44159-023-00205-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychosis research has traditionally focused on vulnerability and the detrimental outcomes of risk exposure. However, there is substantial variability in psychological and functional outcomes for those at risk for psychosis, even among individuals at high risk. Comparatively little work has highlighted the factors associated with resilience and the processes that might avert serious mental illness and promote positive outcomes. In this Review, we first discuss the prevailing risk-based approach to psychosis. We then outline a resilience-based approach by defining multisystemic mental health resilience and considering what constitutes a positive outcome. We examine evidence of biological, psychological, social and environmental protective and promotive factors that might confer resilience in the context of psychosis risk. A greater understanding of the factors and processes implicated in resilience has the potential to inform psychosis intervention and prevention efforts at multiple levels, including individuals, institutions and policy-making. Psychosis research has traditionally focused on vulnerability and the detrimental outcomes of risk exposure. In this Review, Thakkar et al. consider an alternative resilience-based approach focused on resources and strengths that might help protect against negative illness course among people at risk.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":"2 9","pages":"537-555"},"PeriodicalIF":16.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-023-00205-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychosis research has traditionally focused on vulnerability and the detrimental outcomes of risk exposure. However, there is substantial variability in psychological and functional outcomes for those at risk for psychosis, even among individuals at high risk. Comparatively little work has highlighted the factors associated with resilience and the processes that might avert serious mental illness and promote positive outcomes. In this Review, we first discuss the prevailing risk-based approach to psychosis. We then outline a resilience-based approach by defining multisystemic mental health resilience and considering what constitutes a positive outcome. We examine evidence of biological, psychological, social and environmental protective and promotive factors that might confer resilience in the context of psychosis risk. A greater understanding of the factors and processes implicated in resilience has the potential to inform psychosis intervention and prevention efforts at multiple levels, including individuals, institutions and policy-making. Psychosis research has traditionally focused on vulnerability and the detrimental outcomes of risk exposure. In this Review, Thakkar et al. consider an alternative resilience-based approach focused on resources and strengths that might help protect against negative illness course among people at risk.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

从精神病研究的风险到恢复力
精神病研究历来侧重于易感性和风险暴露的有害结果。然而,即使在高危人群中,精神病高危人群的心理和功能结果也存在很大差异。相对而言,很少有研究强调与恢复力相关的因素,以及可能避免严重精神疾病和促进积极结果的过程。在本综述中,我们首先讨论了目前流行的基于风险的精神病治疗方法。然后,我们通过对多系统心理健康复原力的定义以及对积极结果的构成要素的思考,概述了一种以复原力为基础的方法。我们研究了生物、心理、社会和环境方面的保护性和促进性因素,这些因素可能会在精神病风险的背景下赋予抗逆力。进一步了解与复原力有关的因素和过程,有可能为包括个人、机构和政策制定在内的多个层面的精神病干预和预防工作提供信息。精神病研究历来侧重于脆弱性和风险暴露的有害结果。在这篇综述中,Thakkar 等人考虑了另一种基于恢复力的方法,这种方法侧重于资源和优势,这些资源和优势可能有助于保护高危人群免受负面病程的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信