Blurring boundaries: work-life balance and unbounded work in academia. The role of flexibility, organisational support and gender

IF 1.2 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
K. Johnston, Jagriti Tanwar, Susana Pasamar, Darren Van Laar, Annali Bamber Jones
{"title":"Blurring boundaries: work-life balance and unbounded work in academia. The role of flexibility, organisational support and gender","authors":"K. Johnston, Jagriti Tanwar, Susana Pasamar, Darren Van Laar, Annali Bamber Jones","doi":"10.1080/10301763.2022.2081902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The paper explores whether work-life balance (WLB) is affected by the unbounded work context and how organisational support, work flexibility and gender affect this relationship. It is a quantitative study, involving a survey of academics based in three UK institutions, using OLS regressions. There is a significant negative relationship between the perception of the unbounded nature of work and WLB among academics, irrespective of their gender. While flexible work and organisational support are positively associated with WLB, they have limited effect in an unbounded work context. This study makes original contributions for practitioners and academics. First, it provides empirical evidence of the relationship between the unboundedness of work and WLB, and finds no significant gender differences in WLB within an unbounded work context. Second, it helps to understand how flexible work and an organisational support culture are insufficient to eliminate the negative effect of unbounded work. Although the research involves a relatively small sample of UK academics provides insights into WLB in an unbounded work context. As became evident during the coronavirus pandemic, the boundaries between work and non-work domains in contemporary work settings are more and more blurred. Work will therefore become increasingly unbounded, potentially undermining WLB and causing tension between growing work demands and the necessities of family and personal lives.","PeriodicalId":45265,"journal":{"name":"Labour & Industry-A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour & Industry-A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2022.2081902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The paper explores whether work-life balance (WLB) is affected by the unbounded work context and how organisational support, work flexibility and gender affect this relationship. It is a quantitative study, involving a survey of academics based in three UK institutions, using OLS regressions. There is a significant negative relationship between the perception of the unbounded nature of work and WLB among academics, irrespective of their gender. While flexible work and organisational support are positively associated with WLB, they have limited effect in an unbounded work context. This study makes original contributions for practitioners and academics. First, it provides empirical evidence of the relationship between the unboundedness of work and WLB, and finds no significant gender differences in WLB within an unbounded work context. Second, it helps to understand how flexible work and an organisational support culture are insufficient to eliminate the negative effect of unbounded work. Although the research involves a relatively small sample of UK academics provides insights into WLB in an unbounded work context. As became evident during the coronavirus pandemic, the boundaries between work and non-work domains in contemporary work settings are more and more blurred. Work will therefore become increasingly unbounded, potentially undermining WLB and causing tension between growing work demands and the necessities of family and personal lives.
模糊界限:工作与生活的平衡与学术界的无界工作。灵活性、组织支持和性别的作用
摘要本文探讨了工作与生活的平衡是否受到无限工作环境的影响,以及组织支持、工作灵活性和性别如何影响这种关系。这是一项定量研究,涉及对英国三所机构的学者进行的调查,使用OLS回归。在学者中,无论性别如何,对工作无限性质的看法与WLB之间都存在显著的负面关系。虽然灵活的工作和组织支持与WLB呈正相关,但在无限制的工作环境中,它们的作用有限。这项研究为从业者和学术界做出了原创性贡献。首先,它为工作的无边界性和WLB之间的关系提供了经验证据,并发现在无边界的工作环境中,WLB没有显著的性别差异。其次,它有助于理解灵活的工作和组织支持文化不足以消除无限制工作的负面影响。尽管这项研究涉及的英国学者样本相对较少,但它在无限制的工作环境中提供了对WLB的见解。正如在冠状病毒大流行期间显而易见的那样,当代工作环境中工作和非工作领域之间的界限越来越模糊。因此,工作将变得越来越无限制,可能会破坏WLB,并导致日益增长的工作需求与家庭和个人生活必需品之间的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信