Modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block versus epidural analgesia at closure for lumbar discectomy: a randomized prospective study

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
E. Çelik, Mürsel Ekinci, A. Yayik, A. Ahıskalıoğlu, Muhammed Enes Aydi, N. C. Karaavci
{"title":"Modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block versus epidural analgesia at closure for lumbar discectomy: a randomized prospective study","authors":"E. Çelik, Mürsel Ekinci, A. Yayik, A. Ahıskalıoğlu, Muhammed Enes Aydi, N. C. Karaavci","doi":"10.35975/apic.v24i6.1396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & objective: The postoperative period of lumbar discectomy surgery usually involves a period of moderate to severe pain if adequate pain management is not practiced. Various pain controlling methods have been used other than oral and/or parenteral analgesic administration. We aimed to examine the effect of epidural analgesia at closure (EAC) versus modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane (mTLIP) block on postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy. \nMethodology: It was a randomized, prospective study involving sixty adult patients undergoing single-level lumbar discectomy. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. mTLIP group (n=30) received ultrasound-guided bilateral mTLIP block with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. EAC group (n=30) received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine to the epidural space by the surgical team at the closure stage of surgery. Postoperatively, analgesia was performed with intravenous tramadol with a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, opioid consumption, rescue analgesia and side effects were recorded. \nResults: Groups had similar demographic measures. There was statistically no difference in terms of opioid consumption from zero to 4th hr and VAS scores in the 1-2 hrs postoperatively (p > 0.05) between groups. At 4-12 hrs and 12-24 postoperatively hrs intervals, total opioid consumption was significantly lower in Group mTLIP compared to Group EAC (p < 0.05). At the 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th hrs VAS scores were lower in Group mTLIP compared to Group EAC (p < 0.05). Rescue analgesia usage was significantly higher in the Group EAC than in the Group mTLIP, e.g. 11/30 vs. 3/30 respectively (p = 0.015). \nConclusion: Preoperative bilateral, ultrasound-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block offers more effective postoperative analgesia, thus reducing tramadol consumption as compared to epidural analgesia at closure after lumbar discectomy surgery. \nKey words: Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block; Epidural analgesia’; Lumbar discectomy; Postoperative pain; Ultrasound guidance \nCitation: Çelik EC, Ekinci M, Yayik AM, Ahiskalioglu A, Aydi ME, Karaavci NC. Modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block versus epidural analgesia at closure for lumbar discectomy: a randomized prospective study. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2020;24(6):__ \nAbbreviations: EAC – Epidural analgesia at closure; TLIP – thoracolumbar interfascial plane; mTLIP – modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":"125 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v24i6.1396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background & objective: The postoperative period of lumbar discectomy surgery usually involves a period of moderate to severe pain if adequate pain management is not practiced. Various pain controlling methods have been used other than oral and/or parenteral analgesic administration. We aimed to examine the effect of epidural analgesia at closure (EAC) versus modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane (mTLIP) block on postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy. Methodology: It was a randomized, prospective study involving sixty adult patients undergoing single-level lumbar discectomy. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. mTLIP group (n=30) received ultrasound-guided bilateral mTLIP block with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. EAC group (n=30) received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine to the epidural space by the surgical team at the closure stage of surgery. Postoperatively, analgesia was performed with intravenous tramadol with a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, opioid consumption, rescue analgesia and side effects were recorded. Results: Groups had similar demographic measures. There was statistically no difference in terms of opioid consumption from zero to 4th hr and VAS scores in the 1-2 hrs postoperatively (p > 0.05) between groups. At 4-12 hrs and 12-24 postoperatively hrs intervals, total opioid consumption was significantly lower in Group mTLIP compared to Group EAC (p < 0.05). At the 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th hrs VAS scores were lower in Group mTLIP compared to Group EAC (p < 0.05). Rescue analgesia usage was significantly higher in the Group EAC than in the Group mTLIP, e.g. 11/30 vs. 3/30 respectively (p = 0.015). Conclusion: Preoperative bilateral, ultrasound-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block offers more effective postoperative analgesia, thus reducing tramadol consumption as compared to epidural analgesia at closure after lumbar discectomy surgery. Key words: Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block; Epidural analgesia’; Lumbar discectomy; Postoperative pain; Ultrasound guidance Citation: Çelik EC, Ekinci M, Yayik AM, Ahiskalioglu A, Aydi ME, Karaavci NC. Modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block versus epidural analgesia at closure for lumbar discectomy: a randomized prospective study. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2020;24(6):__ Abbreviations: EAC – Epidural analgesia at closure; TLIP – thoracolumbar interfascial plane; mTLIP – modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane
改良胸腰椎筋膜间平面阻滞与硬膜外镇痛在腰椎间盘切除术闭合:一项随机前瞻性研究
背景与目的:如果没有适当的疼痛管理,腰椎间盘切除术术后通常会出现中度至重度疼痛。除了口服和/或肠外给药外,已经使用了各种控制疼痛的方法。我们的目的是研究硬膜外闭合镇痛(EAC)与改良胸腰椎膜间平面(mTLIP)阻滞对腰椎间盘切除术患者术后阿片类药物消耗的影响。方法:这是一项随机的前瞻性研究,涉及60名接受单节段腰椎间盘切除术的成年患者。患者被随机分为两组。mTLIP组(n=30)采用超声引导双侧mTLIP阻滞,0.25%布比卡因20 ml。EAC组(n=30)在手术结束阶段由手术组向硬膜外腔注入0.25%布比卡因20 ml。术后使用患者自控镇痛泵静脉注射曲马多镇痛。记录视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、阿片类药物消耗、抢救镇痛及不良反应。结果:各组人口统计指标相似。两组术后0 ~ 4小时阿片类药物消耗及1 ~ 2小时VAS评分差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。术后4 ~ 12 h和12 ~ 24 h, mTLIP组阿片类药物总消耗量显著低于EAC组(p < 0.05)。第4、8、12、24小时mTLIP组VAS评分低于EAC组(p < 0.05)。EAC组抢救镇痛的使用明显高于mTLIP组,分别为11/30和3/30 (p = 0.015)。结论:术前双侧超声引导下改良胸腰椎筋膜间平面阻滞比腰椎间盘切除术后闭合时硬膜外镇痛更有效,从而减少曲马多的消耗。关键词:胸腰椎筋膜界面阻滞;硬膜外镇痛”;腰椎椎间盘切除术;术后疼痛;超声引导引文:Çelik EC, Ekinci M, Yayik AM, Ahiskalioglu A, Aydi ME, Karaavci NC。改良胸腰椎筋膜间平面阻滞与硬膜外镇痛在腰椎间盘切除术闭合:一项随机前瞻性研究。Anaesth。疼痛重症监护2020;24(6):__缩写:EAC -硬膜外闭合镇痛;lip -胸腰椎筋膜界面;mTLIP改良的胸腰椎界面平面
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信