PAS steps to achieve alignment

M. Arkesteijn
{"title":"PAS steps to achieve alignment","authors":"M. Arkesteijn","doi":"10.7480/ABE.2019.12.4131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus in this chapter is on the component steps of PAS (see Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2). CRE alignment is achieved, as has been shown in chapter 4, if stakeholders can use PAS successfully. PAS is successful if the stakeholders are able to perform each step of PAS. I assume that the stakeholders can perform steps 1 (specifying decision variables), 3 (assigning weights) and 4 (determining design constraints) because these type of steps are part of other multi criteria decision analysis as well. However, it is not known if stakeholders are able to perform the new step 2 (determining preferences) and step 5a (design alternatives) and are willing to select the alternative with the highest overall preference score in step 6. Preferably, this new alternative has a higher overall preference score than the overall preference score in the current situation. However, if the boundary conditions are strict this is not always possible. PAS has been tested in three pilots. \nThis chapter has the following structure: \n–– TU Delft pilot for the food facilities in paragraph 5.1; \n–– TU Delft pilot for lecture halls in paragraph 5.2; \n–– Oracle’s pilot for office locations in paragraph 5.3; \n–– Pilot study comparison and conclusion in paragraph 5.4.","PeriodicalId":30436,"journal":{"name":"ABE Architecture and the Built Environment","volume":"192 ","pages":"181-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABE Architecture and the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7480/ABE.2019.12.4131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus in this chapter is on the component steps of PAS (see Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2). CRE alignment is achieved, as has been shown in chapter 4, if stakeholders can use PAS successfully. PAS is successful if the stakeholders are able to perform each step of PAS. I assume that the stakeholders can perform steps 1 (specifying decision variables), 3 (assigning weights) and 4 (determining design constraints) because these type of steps are part of other multi criteria decision analysis as well. However, it is not known if stakeholders are able to perform the new step 2 (determining preferences) and step 5a (design alternatives) and are willing to select the alternative with the highest overall preference score in step 6. Preferably, this new alternative has a higher overall preference score than the overall preference score in the current situation. However, if the boundary conditions are strict this is not always possible. PAS has been tested in three pilots. This chapter has the following structure: –– TU Delft pilot for the food facilities in paragraph 5.1; –– TU Delft pilot for lecture halls in paragraph 5.2; –– Oracle’s pilot for office locations in paragraph 5.3; –– Pilot study comparison and conclusion in paragraph 5.4.
PAS实现一致性的步骤
本章的重点是PAS的组成步骤(见图5.1和5.2)。如第4章所示,如果利益相关者能够成功使用PAS,则可以实现CRE一致性。如果利益相关者能够执行PAS的每个步骤,则PAS是成功的。我假设利益相关者可以执行步骤1(指定决策变量)、3(分配权重)和4(确定设计约束),因为这些类型的步骤也是其他多标准决策分析的一部分。然而,不知道利益相关者是否能够执行新的步骤2(确定偏好)和步骤5a(设计备选方案),并且是否愿意在步骤6中选择具有最高总体偏好得分的备选方案。优选地,该新的替代方案具有比当前情况下的总体偏好得分更高的总体偏好分数。然而,如果边界条件很严格,这并不总是可能的。PAS已经在三名飞行员身上进行了测试。本章结构如下:–第5.1段中TU Delft食品设施试点项目;–TU Delft第5.2段中的演讲厅试点第5.3段中的Oracle办公地点试点第5.4段中的试点研究比较和结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书