The Influence of Conventional and Biodynamic Winemaking Processes on the Quality of Sangiovese Wine

M. Picchi, Valentina Canuti, M. Bertuccioli, B. Zanoni
{"title":"The Influence of Conventional and Biodynamic Winemaking Processes on the Quality of Sangiovese Wine","authors":"M. Picchi, Valentina Canuti, M. Bertuccioli, B. Zanoni","doi":"10.2147/ijwr.s245183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This research studied the impact of biodynamic and conventional winemaking processes, using biodynamic grapes, on both the intrinsic and perceived quality of some Sangiovese wines. Materials and Methods: Three wineries producing biodynamic wine and a conventional winery participated in the study during the 2015 and 2016 harvests. Biodynamic and conventional winemaking protocols were applied on the same biodynamic Sangiovese grapes. The eligibility, identity, and style properties (the intrinsic quality) of both the biodynamic and conventional wines were measured after malolactic fermentation. Moreover, a group of experts evaluated the perceived quality by rating the overall quality and typicality of the wines. Results: The experimental data showed that the intrinsic quality of Sangiovese wine samples was affected greatly by the vintage and winemaking protocol factors and slightly by the growing area factor. Signi fi cant differences in phenolic and aroma pro fi le, intensity of taste, odor, and fl avor attributes occurred between the biodynamic and conventional wine samples. The above differences in intrinsic quality levels did not lead to a different evaluation of either the perceived overall quality or perceived typicality by the wine experts. Conclusion: The above result can be considered important because the biodynamic winemaking process affected the intrinsic quality level of the Sangiovese wines while the perceived overall quality and typicality of the biodynamic and conventional wines were not signi fi cantly different. The tested biodynamic wineries were able to produce appreciated biodynamic Sangiovese wine, as was the conventional one, but with the use of fewer resources in the winemaking process.","PeriodicalId":56345,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/ijwr.s245183","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Wine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwr.s245183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Purpose: This research studied the impact of biodynamic and conventional winemaking processes, using biodynamic grapes, on both the intrinsic and perceived quality of some Sangiovese wines. Materials and Methods: Three wineries producing biodynamic wine and a conventional winery participated in the study during the 2015 and 2016 harvests. Biodynamic and conventional winemaking protocols were applied on the same biodynamic Sangiovese grapes. The eligibility, identity, and style properties (the intrinsic quality) of both the biodynamic and conventional wines were measured after malolactic fermentation. Moreover, a group of experts evaluated the perceived quality by rating the overall quality and typicality of the wines. Results: The experimental data showed that the intrinsic quality of Sangiovese wine samples was affected greatly by the vintage and winemaking protocol factors and slightly by the growing area factor. Signi fi cant differences in phenolic and aroma pro fi le, intensity of taste, odor, and fl avor attributes occurred between the biodynamic and conventional wine samples. The above differences in intrinsic quality levels did not lead to a different evaluation of either the perceived overall quality or perceived typicality by the wine experts. Conclusion: The above result can be considered important because the biodynamic winemaking process affected the intrinsic quality level of the Sangiovese wines while the perceived overall quality and typicality of the biodynamic and conventional wines were not signi fi cantly different. The tested biodynamic wineries were able to produce appreciated biodynamic Sangiovese wine, as was the conventional one, but with the use of fewer resources in the winemaking process.
传统和生物动力酿酒工艺对桑娇维塞葡萄酒品质的影响
目的:本研究研究了使用生物动力葡萄的生物动力和传统酿酒工艺对一些Sangiovese葡萄酒的内在和感知质量的影响。材料和方法:三家生产生物动力葡萄酒的酒庄和一家传统酒庄在2015年和2016年的收成期间参与了这项研究。生物动力学和传统酿酒规程被应用于相同的生物动力学Sangiovese葡萄。在苹果酸乳酸发酵后,对生物动力葡萄酒和传统葡萄酒的合格性、特性和风格特性(内在质量)进行了测量。此外,一组专家通过对葡萄酒的整体质量和典型性进行评级来评估感知质量。结果:实验数据表明,桑娇韦葡萄酒样品的内在品质受年份和酿酒工艺因素的影响较大,受生长面积因素的影响较小。生物动力学和传统葡萄酒样品在酚类和香气、味觉、气味和风味方面存在显著差异。上述内在质量水平的差异并没有导致葡萄酒专家对感知的整体质量或感知的典型性进行不同的评估。结论:上述结果可以被认为是重要的,因为生物动力酿酒过程影响了桑娇维塞葡萄酒的内在质量水平,而生物动力葡萄酒和传统葡萄酒的总体质量和典型性没有显著差异。经过测试的生物动力酒庄能够像传统酒庄一样生产出受欢迎的生物动力桑娇维塞葡萄酒,但在酿酒过程中使用的资源较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信